Pure speculation. But I do spend time reading various interviews in US and translated foreign languages.
There are at least two teams at Denon. One is the 3700H and below team. The other is the 6700H and above team. I don't know where the 4700H lies.
The X3700H is likely fully subcontracted out for its design and relies on the most single-chip integration. Since it does not need the extra processing power for Auro3D and has some limitations with DTS Virtual X/Audyssey, it represents the "best" implementation of what the B-team can do.
The X6500 is talked about as a near flagship, and at the time they built the X6500H, they were planning the X8500H. This is built around a different team in Japan. In fact, the x6 and x8 series are made in Japan. All I ever hear is the analog performance and amplifier performance of these units. The more amps/channels you add to a box, the higher likelihood you run into problems. The DDSC-HD and AL32 processing which is forced on may add noise to the system even though the benefits of AL32 may not be heard. (The original ALPHA processing was beneficial in the early era of16-bit DACs, but it gets hard to drop the brand/technology despite improvements in DAC chips).
The X4 series is odd. They are not made in the Japanese factory, but utilizes the CPU board from the X8500h (reportedly).
From a science standpoint, we need to test the X3700H, which would show the impact of the HDMI receiver and the X8500H to show what Denon's flagship engineers in Japan are targeting (as opposed to fortuitously reaching with the x3600H).
I also remember from JBL's history that one of the best speakers was the HLS-610, developed by Allan Devantier. So even though it was a budget speaker, it sounded really good because of the team. There may very well be an engineer on the X3600H team who is the secret behind Denon.