• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Onkyo/Takamine D-TK10 vs JBL 708P

GXAlan

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
4,544
Likes
7,077
Onkyo D-TK10 “Vintage” Speaker Review
(vs. JBL 708P)

8C5BB83A-A67B-49AA-9628-3AD61DBE0738.jpeg


TLDR? They’re great. No they’re not really vintage but they are the last flagship speaker from the pre-bankrupt Onkyo.

Eighteen years ago, Onkyo launched a statement pair of speakers, the D-TK10. Using an enclosure made by Takamine (the preferred guitar manufacturer of artists like Garth Brooks, Bruce Springsteen, Don Henley and Jon Bon Jovi) and all-custom Onkyo-manufactured drivers, the D-TK10 was sold at $2000/pair! Rather than towering behemoths that you’d associate with a flagship, these speakers only have 4” woofers and are a svelte 6.4 pounds!

1673226854666.jpeg


There was some great technical marketing at the Japanese Onkyo website describing the work that went into the enclosure and speaker drivers.

Drivers

Enclosure

But no such detail was available in English.

The advertised specifications are uninspiring and read like marketing hyperbole.

FEATURES
10 cm A-OMF Monocoque Diaphragm Woofer
3 cm Ring-Drive Tweeter
Supported by a Large Voice Coil
Takamine Acoustic Voicing Technology Construction
Aero Acoustic Drive for Powerful and Natural Sound
Network Circuit with High-Quality Parts
Gold-plated, Banana Plug-Compatible Speaker Posts

GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Max. input power: 200 W
Frequency response: 50 Hz–100 kHz
WHD: 133 x 276 x 220 mm
Weight: 2.9 kg

These speakers were also harshly criticized by Stereophile in a series of lengthy blog posts. The writer considered his DeVore Gibbon as a “gold standard” and the Onkyo’s were never reviewed formally by Stereophile. I am not aware of any measurements that have been published.

The DeVore line of speakers sound wonderful and look beautiful, but they are not accurate speakers. Still, the Stereophile writer had some strong opinions about this speaker.


The DeVores imparted the movement of the dance, gave the dance sway, and used the strong hand of love to neaten the overall presentation, adding life and intensity to the music. The Onkyos, it seemed, left things just the slightest bit loose and ragged. Just as I expected!

And the Onkyo D-TK10 loudspeakers, to me, are kind of like that. They're like little effects boxes. At the right time, with the right song, they can be absolutely wonderful. They are special speakers — specialty speakers, in fact — that are very good-looking and often lots of fun, that, while showing utter respect for the acoustic guitar and acoustic guitar music, in general, ultimately seem to lack respect for so many other types of instruments and music.

With those types of subjective comments, who in their right mind would want to try these speakers?

Me. That’s who. Statement products during an economic bubble? That’s the best time to find diamonds in the rough.

I found a nice deal on a used pair of speaker from a retailer in Japan. These are notoriously fragile and cannot be shipped in the absence of the original packaging unless you really trust the expertise of the seller. I reached out to @amirm to see if he had any time last year (October) to test these but unfortunately, Amir was pretty busy so I just had them shipped to me.

1673226962736.jpeg

I spent the last several months listening to them subjectively and I found these speakers to sound great. They are sensitive to listening position, specifically speaker height, presumably due to the angled tweeter, but even without EQ or room correction, they do things well.

Since there were no good measurements out there, I decided to do some simple measurements and compare them in-room against the JBL 708P which has undergone extensive measurements here along with the recent 708i measurements that rekindled my interest in the comparison.

Test Configuration
Measured in my actual office. The listening/measuring position is about 8 feet away. Speakers are about 6-7 feet apart. Both left and right speakers were used for the REW sweep at listening position

As you see from the first photo, the speakers are in an Elfa wall-mounted shelving system which creates some extra bass from boundary gain.

The UMIK-1 microphone was directed toward speakers at ear height. The listening position is also against a wall.
1673227623110.jpeg


Equipment
1) YellowTec PUC2 Lite AES/EBU to JBL 708P
vs.
2) Korg DS-DAC-10R unbalanced to Marantz PM-10 to Onkyo D-TK10

Volume matched in REW to 80 dB at listening position.

GREEN = JBL 708P
PURPLE = Onkyo D-TK10


First, 1/1 Octave Smoothing to show overall sound signature at the listening position between the two speakers
1673227671760.png

1/12 Octave Smoothing
1673227885396.png


C50 and C80 measurements for the Onkyo vs JBL.
1673231674989.png

1673231694790.png


Distortion at listening position for the Onkyo.
1673245000347.png


I then took some “nearfield” measurements about 1 foot away (single speaker) for the D-TK10 to reduce the room effects while still giving a reasonable integration of the two drivers. I did not move the speakers out of the Elfa shelf.
1673227974448.png

And the same 1 foot nearfield measurement with 1/1 smoothing
1673227984668.png


Finally, I tried an ultra near field with the microphone about 1 cm away from the driver.

This is at 1/48 octave smoothing.
1673243989554.png

Versus ZERO smoothing
1673245493163.png


And here is the distortion data
1673244020595.png

1673244034343.png


Subjective Impressions:
Bass shy, but an excellent speaker with a 4” woofer. There are certainly better options out there if you can fit bigger speakers, but in the super small speaker class, it’s excellent. I preferred the Onkyo’s to the SB Acoustics Micro-C and the XPL90’s (which are huge in comparison).
1673233655098.jpeg


There is a hefty price premium incurred for “made in Japan, cabinet manufactured by Takamine” and a physics penalty for having something so small. These Onkyo’s are essentially audio jewelry, but it’s pretty clear that there is real engineering behind these speakers. Remember, these speakers are 18 years old!
Guitars sounded great on the Onkyo’s. I am sure a lot of this is sighted bias but acoustic guitars sounded more truthful on the Onkyo D-TK10 than the JBL 708P. If I had to provide an objective rationale for the guitar sound, it may be that the 240-500Hz range had relatively low distortion on the nearfield REW sweep which is suggested as an important range for guitars in this infographic:

1673234002986.png


The subjective testing used in the development of these speakers famously involved real Takamine guitars and the reproduction.

Conclusion:
These measurements are not high quality, quasi-anechoic spinoramas. There are clear limitations to vertical speaker placement which likely would easily be seen on a Klippel NFS.

The point to be made is that sighted bias works in both positive and negative directions. It can make you think budget brands sound worse than they really do. These Onkyo speakers are lightweight and have none of the physical heft you’d associate with a premium speaker. In 2005, Onkyo 7.1 AVRs started at just $300 so Onkyo was hardly considered a luxury audio jewelry brand in the US at that time (despite having a more favorable premium position in Japan with historic products like the Grand Integra line)

By any measure, the JBL 708P is a great speaker. One may prefer a Revel, KEF, Genelec, or Newman flagship over the JBL 708P but it would be a comparison between a great speaker and an “even better” speaker. That the Onkyo D-TK10 so closely matched the JBL 708P even at 1/12 octave smoothing in actual in-room measurements was a surprise to me.

Certainly these results should be sufficient to show that they are far from Stereophile’s description that they are a “little effects box.” These probably would have been truly state of the art 18 years ago.

What I am curious about is how today’s modern statement speakers designed in Japan perform.

Will someone send Amir a Diatone DS-4NB70 or Yamaha NS-5000?
 
Last edited:
Love such rare Japanese loudspeakers, it should be said though they were expensive (1500€ pair price in Europe), which relativizes their value for money.

It’s also unclear if they’d actually beat the Genelec 8320D (though again, these Onkyo’s are from 2005 so it’s a bit of an unfair comparison).

The same Takamine enclosure is used by Kiso Acoustics, but the speaker price has skyrocketed! There are a few different models but the flagships with a Fostex tweeter and Peerless woofer go for €18700 !


 
Onkyo D-TK10 “Vintage” Speaker Review
(vs. JBL 708P)

View attachment 255983


TLDR? They’re great. No they’re not really vintage but they are the last flagship speaker from the pre-bankrupt Onkyo.

Eighteen years ago, Onkyo launched a statement pair of speakers, the D-TK10. Using an enclosure made by Takamine (the preferred guitar manufacturer of artists like Garth Brooks, Bruce Springsteen, Don Henley and Jon Bon Jovi) and all-custom Onkyo-manufactured drivers, the D-TK10 was sold at $2000/pair! Rather than towering behemoths that you’d associate with a flagship, these speakers only have 4” woofers and are a svelte 6.4 pounds!

View attachment 255984

There was some great technical marketing at the Japanese Onkyo website describing the work that went into the enclosure and speaker drivers.

Drivers

Enclosure

But no such detail was available in English.

The advertised specifications are uninspiring and read like marketing hyperbole.

FEATURES
10 cm A-OMF Monocoque Diaphragm Woofer
3 cm Ring-Drive Tweeter
Supported by a Large Voice Coil
Takamine Acoustic Voicing Technology Construction
Aero Acoustic Drive for Powerful and Natural Sound
Network Circuit with High-Quality Parts
Gold-plated, Banana Plug-Compatible Speaker Posts

GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Max. input power: 200 W
Frequency response: 50 Hz–100 kHz
WHD: 133 x 276 x 220 mm
Weight: 2.9 kg

These speakers were also harshly criticized by Stereophile in a series of lengthy blog posts. The writer considered his DeVore Gibbon as a “gold standard” and the Onkyo’s were never reviewed formally by Stereophile. I am not aware of any measurements that have been published.

The DeVore line of speakers sound wonderful and look beautiful, but they are not accurate speakers. Still, the Stereophile writer had some strong opinions about this speaker.


The DeVores imparted the movement of the dance, gave the dance sway, and used the strong hand of love to neaten the overall presentation, adding life and intensity to the music. The Onkyos, it seemed, left things just the slightest bit loose and ragged. Just as I expected!

And the Onkyo D-TK10 loudspeakers, to me, are kind of like that. They're like little effects boxes. At the right time, with the right song, they can be absolutely wonderful. They are special speakers — specialty speakers, in fact — that are very good-looking and often lots of fun, that, while showing utter respect for the acoustic guitar and acoustic guitar music, in general, ultimately seem to lack respect for so many other types of instruments and music.

With those types of subjective comments, who in their right mind would want to try these speakers?

Me. That’s who. Statement products during an economic bubble? That’s the best time to find diamonds in the rough.

I found a nice deal on a used pair of speaker from a retailer in Japan. These are notoriously fragile and cannot be shipped in the absence of the original packaging unless you really trust the expertise of the seller. I reached out to @amirm to see if he had any time last year (October) to test these but unfortunately, Amir was pretty busy so I just had them shipped to me.

View attachment 255985

I spent the last several months listening to them subjectively and I found these speakers to sound great. They are sensitive to listening position, specifically speaker height, presumably due to the angled tweeter, but even without EQ or room correction, they do things well.

Since there were no good measurements out there, I decided to do some simple measurements and compare them in-room against the JBL 708P which has undergone extensive measurements here along with the recent 708i measurements that rekindled my interest in the comparison.

Test Configuration
Measured in my actual office. The listening/measuring position is about 8 feet away. Speakers are about 6-7 feet apart. Both left and right speakers were used for the REW sweep at listening position

As you see from the first photo, the speakers are in an Elfa wall-mounted shelving system which creates some extra bass from boundary gain.

The UMIK-1 microphone was directed toward speakers at ear height. The listening position is also against a wall.
View attachment 255987

Equipment
1) YellowTec PUC2 Lite AES/EBU to JBL 708P
vs.
2) Korg DS-DAC-10R unbalanced to Marantz PM-10 to Onkyo D-TK10

Volume matched in REW to 80 dB at listening position.

GREEN = JBL 708P
PURPLE = Onkyo D-TK10


First, 1/1 Octave Smoothing to show overall sound signature at the listening position between the two speakers
View attachment 255988
1/12 Octave Smoothing
View attachment 255989

C50 and C80 measurements for the Onkyo vs JBL.
View attachment 255997
View attachment 255998

Distortion at listening position for the Onkyo.
View attachment 256014

I then took some “nearfield” measurements about 1 foot away (single speaker) for the D-TK10 to reduce the room effects while still giving a reasonable integration of the two drivers. I did not move the speakers out of the Elfa shelf.
View attachment 255990
And the same 1 foot nearfield measurement with 1/1 smoothing
View attachment 255992

Finally, I tried an ultra near field with the microphone about 1 cm away from the driver.

This is at 1/48 octave smoothing.
View attachment 256010
Versus ZERO smoothing
View attachment 256015

And here is the distortion data
View attachment 256011
View attachment 256012

Subjective Impressions:
Bass shy, but an excellent speaker with a 4” woofer. There are certainly better options out there if you can fit bigger speakers, but in the super small speaker class, it’s excellent. I preferred the Onkyo’s to the SB Acoustics Micro-C and the XPL90’s (which are huge in comparison).
View attachment 256002

There is a hefty price premium incurred for “made in Japan, cabinet manufactured by Takamine” and a physics penalty for having something so small. These Onkyo’s are essentially audio jewelry, but it’s pretty clear that there is real engineering behind these speakers. Remember, these speakers are 18 years old!
Guitars sounded great on the Onkyo’s. I am sure a lot of this is sighted bias but acoustic guitars sounded more truthful on the Onkyo D-TK10 than the JBL 708P. If I had to provide an objective rationale for the guitar sound, it may be that the 240-500Hz range had relatively low distortion on the nearfield REW sweep which is suggested as an important range for guitars in this infographic:

View attachment 256003

The subjective testing used in the development of these speakers famously involved real Takamine guitars and the reproduction.

Conclusion:
These measurements are not high quality, quasi-anechoic spinoramas. There are clear limitations to vertical speaker placement which likely would easily be seen on a Klippel NFS.

The point to be made is that sighted bias works in both positive and negative directions. It can make you think budget brands sound worse than they really do. These Onkyo speakers are lightweight and have none of the physical heft you’d associate with a premium speaker. In 2005, Onkyo 7.1 AVRs started at just $300 so Onkyo was hardly considered a luxury audio jewelry brand in the US at that time (despite having a more favorable premium position in Japan with historic products like the Grand Integra line)

By any measure, the JBL 708P is a great speaker. One may prefer a Revel, KEF, Genelec, or Newman flagship over the JBL 708P but it would be a comparison between a great speaker and an “even better” speaker. That the Onkyo D-TK10 so closely matched the JBL 708P even at 1/12 octave smoothing in actual in-room measurements was a surprise to me.

Certainly these results should be sufficient to show that they are far from Stereophile’s description that they are a “little effects box.” These probably would have been truly state of the art 18 years ago.

What I am curious about is how today’s modern statement speakers designed in Japan perform.

Will someone send Amir a Diatone DS-4NB70 or Yamaha NS-5000?
Wow, they really do measure almost identically, apart from the JBL having more bass. Not that surprising then that they sound pretty good!
 
Wow, they really do measure almost identically, apart from the JBL having more bass. Not that surprising then that they sound pretty good!
Yeah, it’s crazy that I ended up gravitating toward the 708p and Onkyo as my top two speakers in that room. More surprising since there is no EQ or room treatment. It’s easy to tell the difference because of the bass, so they don’t sound the same in-room, but I felt as if I couldn’t pick between the two so easily in terms of favorites, even though I still think that guitars have a bit more realism or snap to them on the Onkyo.

The Korg DS-DAC-10R is not a fancy DAC. The similar model measured here only had a 96 dB SINAD. But it’s possible that the PM-10 is a better amplifier than the internal amplifiers of the 708P.
 
Yeah, it’s crazy that I ended up gravitating toward the 708p and Onkyo as my top two speakers in that room. More surprising since there is no EQ or room treatment. It’s easy to tell the difference because of the bass, so they don’t sound the same in-room, but I felt as if I couldn’t pick between the two so easily in terms of favorites, even though I still think that guitars have a bit more realism or snap to them on the Onkyo.

The Korg DS-DAC-10R is not a fancy DAC. The similar model measured here only had a 96 dB SINAD. But it’s possible that the PM-10 is a better amplifier than the internal amplifiers of the 708P.
I think the differences you're experiencing are pretty much all due to the different speakers, I don't think the DAC and amp you use as standalone with the Onkyo vs the internal amps of the 708p are going to be influential in the experience.
 
I think the differences you're experiencing are pretty much all due to the different speakers, I don't think the DAC and amp you use as standalone with the Onkyo vs the internal amps of the 708p are going to be influential in the experience.
Agreed. It’s a real testament to the idea that if you design gear to be accurate, you can use any combination of electronics or speaker components.
 
Agreed. It’s a real testament to the idea that if you design gear to be accurate, you can use any combination of electronics or speaker components.
I mean I have bought a DAC & headphone amp that have been tested by Amir (& would do so in the future), so I know they're not a broken product and do everything I want them to and with enough power, but yeah it's the speakers that make the difference.
 
1686013386749.png


I tried a 50 kHz test tone to see if the Onkyo actually could reproduce anything. It really does!
 
Onkyo D-TK10 “Vintage” Speaker Review

Thank you for the thoughtful and well-reasoned review. I thoroughly enjoy these kinds of memory-lane-as-lesson-plan sort of posts. Super interesting and highly educational.
 
It’s also unclear if they’d actually beat the Genelec 8320D (though again, these Onkyo’s are from 2005 so it’s a bit of an unfair comparison).
I bought my Genelec 8020a in 2006, for € 275 each.
 
Back
Top Bottom