They were more than adequate for my 5x7m room ...
I recently designed a system for a local warehouse party with these. Crossed to 6x TH115 and 2x BC215 subwoofers arranged in an arc-beamsteered array. Sounded stunning. 98-104db(a) across the dancefloor, ridiculously crystal clear. Sh96HO is totally overkill for any domestic setting, IMO.Anyone mention any offerings from Danely, here a little vid of the the Danley SH96SO in action.
Danley seems to have scrubbed their site of mentions. Phase and FR are posted here in Keith's thread.There are no published specs?
Extremely interested in these :Prototypes of some of the other speakers in the ‘signature’ range,
Assuming you meant to reply to me with the ARA speakers. And yes they have quite a sizeable folded horn (speaker in back is the larger brother of the ones I originally sent, the same concept though).
View attachment 283526
The HRE’s were an exceptionally clean clear sound, I thought at first there might be an excess of H/F but the in room measurements were superb, ( after I added a couple of filters) I suggested an rrp that would have competed with other fine measuring contemporary loudspeakers 60k is boutique pricing.I recently designed a system for a local warehouse party with these. Crossed to 6x TH115 and 2x BC215 subwoofers arranged in an arc-beamsteered array. Sounded stunning. 98-104db(a) across the dancefloor, ridiculously crystal clear. Sh96HO is totally overkill for any domestic setting, IMO.
View attachment 283533
Danley seems to have scrubbed their site of mentions. Phase and FR are posted here in Keith's thread.
Tom Danley’s new Hyperion
First photographs posted on the Hyperion site, https://tomdanley.com/hyperion/ Keithwww.audiosciencereview.com
Why would a manufacturer password protect the marketing material of a product but allows a dealer to talk about it?Danley seems to have scrubbed their site of mentions. Phase and FR are posted here in Keith's thread.
Tom Danley’s new Hyperion
First photographs posted on the Hyperion site, https://tomdanley.com/hyperion/ Keithwww.audiosciencereview.com
Why would a manufacturer does that?
Extremely odd and unprofessional behaviour, if you ask me.HRE1 | Danley Sound Labs
www.danleysoundlabs.com
My bad, apparently they rebranded it from "Hyperion" to "HRE1" Specs are listed in the link above. Half the page is loren-ipsum filler text, and they are using a picture of the Jericho J8 in place for the "ILE3" so seems like a very much work-in-progress webpage.
I think Keith is probably the best person to ask, I only interface with them for live sound work, and Keith seems to have a relationship with their home audio endeavors.
I Agree. They've been teasing this product for over a year, with 3 cosmetic redesigns, no pricing or release date announced and the website page is still filler text. Bizzare behavior for a pretty well-established company. Kind of makes my recommendation to OP irrelevant if you can't even buy them or get a date when you will be able to.Extremely odd and unprofessional behaviour, if you ask me.
In other words we are talking about product(s) that doesn’t yet exists on the market. Everything is just speculation.I believe the whole project is very much a work in progress, I did suggest that the domestic and live sound markets are very different…
the HRE1 would be a tough sale, although it is truly formidable.
Keith
I recently designed a system for a local warehouse party with these. Crossed to 6x TH115 and 2x BC215 subwoofers arranged in an arc-beamsteered array. Sounded stunning. 98-104db(a) across the dancefloor, ridiculously crystal clear. Sh96HO is totally overkill for any domestic setting, IMO.
View attachment 283533
Danley seems to have scrubbed their site of mentions. Phase and FR are posted here in Keith's thread.
Tom Danley’s new Hyperion
First photographs posted on the Hyperion site, https://tomdanley.com/hyperion/ Keithwww.audiosciencereview.com
Extremely interested in these :
View attachment 283535
I recently designed a system for a local warehouse party with these. Crossed to 6x TH115 and 2x BC215 subwoofers arranged in an arc-beamsteered array. Sounded stunning. 98-104db(a) across the dancefloor, ridiculously crystal clear. Sh96HO is totally overkill for any domestic setting, IMO.
View attachment 283533
I would have liked to have heard your room set up with the Danley's, sounds impressive. The OP did mention that his room dimensions are 25' x 60' with 30 foot ceilings. That almost seems too big for home audio gear, yes?
Thank you for this very kind and very thorough analysis and calculation. Safe to assume that with the provided specs for the salons we are not going to be able to hit the desired spl's. Plus compression data it's not really available anyways. Putting them safely out of the running.There's few discrepancies in your 100dBSPL calculation that all together add up significantly, imo.
First is @aliqaz has said he listens at 20ft or 6.1m, not 5m. Second is the Salon2's nominal impedance is 6 ohm, not 8 ohm.
Third is I see you attributed two speakers to provide a full +6dB summation....which is very unrealistic ime. +3dB is commonly used for this.
So all those together add to needing about 58V and 570 W per speaker, not 34V and 144W.
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
But I think the far bigger issue, is that this type of calculation is for AVERAGE SPL, and AVERAGE POWER.
In #209, Duke linked an in-room SPL calculator http://myhometheater.homestead.com/splcalculator.html#anchor_13193
It makes the same type calculation.
Here's a screen shot of that calculator using the Salon2 with the numbers i posted above.
(Note stated 86.4 sensitivity has to be adjusted down by -1.2dB, because Revel used 2.83V which is 1.33W, not 1W, into it's nominal 6 ohms.)
View attachment 283467
It is a calculator for finding maximum average SPL at the listening position, using the speaker's sensitivity , amplifier wattage, and distance.
It has no consideration of headroom needed for producing uncompressed peak signal.
If the amplifier wattage includes it's entire headroom available (which is a spec that's very hard to find on almost any amp because it varies by time duration).
the calculator would give peak maximum SPL...the headroom needed for transients above average SPL.
Generally, I've found it's not safe to assume there is more that +3dB amp headroom above rated wattage. Very good amps may have +6dB. Extraordinarily excellent ones perhaps higher.
How much headroom is needed?
I saw Duke in same post say he likes +8-10dB (Personally, I'm a clean-headroom junkie, and like +18dB..we will ignore me )
Let's just go with a +9 dB needed.....which equates to 8x the 570W power already in the average calculator. (2^3rd ...a doubling for each 3dB)
Yikes ! 4560W for clean headroom.
Ok, so we're clearly in fantasy land....
Let's go the other way, lets try to input the max unclipped amp wattage we can reason out for a 570W amp (not for from the 600W @aliqaz mentioned used for the current Revels)
We could just divide the 570W by 8 to give room for peaks, which would give about 71W; but lets be generous to the amp and say it has +3dB honest headroom.
So, only need to dived by 4 for 142 W,
View attachment 283483
Now we have 94dB at listening position....but this is transient peak SPL,
and we need to subtract the +9dB it has over average SPL.
To get to a max average 85dB at LP, unclippled by amp.
Ok, take all this with a grain of salt...it doesn't account for room contributions, it's a spitball guess about amp headroom, and what sensitivity is across the spectrum.
And who knows if all the driver sections are able to maintain linearity, at the now implied 1m 98 dB average, and 107 dB peak.
My guess is they all can, other than the three 8" subs petering out at very low freq,
Not bad at all.
Not what I'd call good though. Especially given only +9 dB was used for transients.
If you want to allow for more clean headroom, just subtract that number from whatever the in-room SPL calculater gives (using rated amp wattage) to get maximum average SPL at LP.
Hope this was of some help to any trying to wrap their head around,what does it really take to turn up the volume without hearing strain.
Exactly. I have no desire to listen to 115 DB for any length of time, much less 100 DB for any more than short periods of time. I casually listen at 80 to 85 db, and critically listen maybe between 90 and 95 DB where I get the sensation of live volume. This is only on occasion. As Bjorn said, there is the need to hit transient peaks, plus the need for further headroom and the desire to avoid compression as much as possible at any volume.I believe he's talking about maximum short peaks. If he is listening an average level of 95 dB sometimes (still very loud), certain passages can reach 115 dB. I've vistied people who cranked up the average level to about 100-105 dB and they claimed they listened that loud occasionally (but not for long).
Thank you for this very kind and very thorough analysis and calculation. Safe to assume that with the provided specs for the salons we are not going to be able to hit the desired spl's. Plus compression data it's not really available anyways. Putting them safely out of the running.
I guess that puts horn speakers to the forefrontLet’s look at this 115dB peak problem from an excursion limit angle. Here is the calc.
A 1" dome tweeter will require 3mm peak to peak excursion at 2000Hz the usual crossover frequency. That is around 3x the average driver. Unless you cut off the tweeter at 6000Hz, there’s no hope for it to produce 115dBSPL peaks.
In other words 115dBSPL is not within the capacity of non-horn speakers.
The look is very important, also I have their smaller siblings just next door. And I would like to try something a bit different.Given that you know that you like the sound of your JBL’s, and high power/compression is an issue, why not simplify and go for the 4367? It seems to hit all of the criteria except for a potentially polarizing visual look?
It really does, but I'm able to find much detail including pricing much less data on their websiteTheir image of the box on the left, suspended, looks fabulous.