lordhumungous
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2020
- Messages
- 254
- Likes
- 310
I'd rather spend the extra money and buy a hypex or purifi amp.
Interesting, plus your thread you refer to. This with a Zobel network was a smart solution.The impedance measurement of the JBL 590 bears a strong resemblance to the complex load used by Erin in his WiiM Amp review (more details can be found here). Therefore, it is likely that the impedance curve of the JBL 590 in the presence range of 2-4kHz will create a frequency response bump of approximately 0.6dB with the WiiM Amp.
This should be audible, but not in the sense of "every piece of music sounds wrong", rather more like "some music pieces exhibit somewhat aggressive-sounding parts".
This impression could be further amplified, depending on the Quality factor (Q) and the exact location of the frequency response peak performed by the WiiM Amp (due to the speaker load), by the sound power, early reflections, and PIR (Power Impulse Response) curve of the JBL 590, as it already exhibits a slight bump in the presence range (see purple rectangle):
View attachment 350989
For those without a calibrated measurement microphone and knowledge of how to perform quasi-anechoic frequency response measurements, one can try to eliminate possible tonal inconsistencies purely by EQ by ear or implementing an impedance linearization for a few dollars to minimize the effects of amplifier load dependency.
Since Amir has measured the impedance frequency response of the JBL 590 it's easy to do so. After importing the JBL 590 impedance measurement into VCAD, impedance linearization can easily be performed.
In case of the JBL 590, a Zobel network consisting of a 22µF electrolytic capacitor and a 12-ohm ceramic resistor for around $4 should suffice (green impedance curve is with Zobel network):
View attachment 350994
With the Zobel network connected in parallel to the speaker terminal of the JBL 590 (more details here), the frequency response of the WiiM Amp should then approximately match what Amir measured with the constant impedance load of 4 and 8 ohms (somewhere between).
Some cables at home ..pfff compared to:At least he doesn't believes in cables.
I appreciate WiiM is deploying Parametric EQ to such relatively cheap hardware devices and look forward to the possibility that 'room correction' wiil be added later, perhaps when 'refurbished' WiiM Amps start appearing in Linkplay's outlet store on Ebay at a discount to the list price.Their latest roadmap update (10 Feb 24) says they’re working on 8 band PEQ and room correction for the Amp (and Pro/ Plus) as well as other stuff.
WiiM Amp Roadmap
Updated on Feb. 10th., 2024 What we're working on … We want to give you visibility into some of the features we are working on. Our official release notes have the complete list of released features. If you want to make a feature or pr...faq.wiimhome.com
That’s exactly what I want to do with my dbr62 and b&w610 in my bedroom. I’m just hoping that the high impedance of dbr62 in the 4khz to 20khz area doesn’t boost too much the treble. Has anyone already tried this combo, or has any predictions?Couldn't agree more. This ticks a lot of boxes for music lovers on a low budget.
Big plus here is the App, stability of the streamer, and the high pass on the mains and low pass on the sub out, which we asked Fosi to implement in the previous thread.
Perfect for a second system or for those starting out in hifi - just add a pair of Elac or Wharfdale bookshelves and a second hand sub .... $700-$800 total for great sound and convenience.
The Audio World is a wonderful place at the moment with more and more inexpensive high performance gear being produced.
Apples and onionsI'd rather spend the extra money and buy a hypex or purifi amp.
I am happy to answer rhetorical questionsDo you hear these FR deviations? Maybe, or maybe not. In any case, in my world I think HiFi electronics should have straight FR. It should be a fundamental aspect of the construction.
And can use a turntable, as is also a bit of a fad among some (I never quite using my Technics SL-M3 or my DUAL 1229).It's crazy to be in the HiFi hobby today. This guy at $300 + a pair of Ascend Acoustics CBM-170SE at $368, total $668 and you have a very high fidelity system. That's a streamer, DAC, looks to be a very basic DSP in there as there is EQ, integrated amp, and a pair of excellent speakers.
This is a system a college student can afford.
Most of these Chinese products, aren't so expensive to begin with. A SOTA Chinese DAC is $900USD, even if you sell it for $$450USD, it's not a big deal, assuming you kept it for at least two years. Ever since I started to buy standalone DACs, 4 years ago, it only have been Chinese DACs, I have no major issues and any minor issues I had, the retailer did the right thing.I'll always advice to buy used HiFi. You can have a TOTL system for peanuts. You may be able to get a cheap chinese amp new. But it is not worth anything in a couple of years.
Not that I disagree with you though.
Sometimes sinad can be dominated be noise and noise stays at the same level on all power levelsI’ve noticed these wonder class D’s seem to have better SINAD the higher their power output. This one in fact dips lowest at the test specifications.
While testing the limits is what I like about this site, doesn’t most listening happen around 100mW, where this and many other class D amps show a SINAD of ~70? Unlike the Hypex and Purifi amps that have equally low distortion across the board for an appropriately exorbitant price.
Not really. They are amplifiers and should do that properly within their respective design envelope. It is easily possible for very cheap chip amps to perform nicely with proper design. I earlier linked to an amp costing about a third of the Wiim amp that doesn't have load variance.Apples and onions
Another controversial point - would the patent survive scrutiny? Between undergrad level control theory and prior patents showing feedback from after a 2nd order output filter I'm not sure what there is in that patent that shouldn't be obvious. Then again I'm not a patent lawyer (or any other sort for that matter) and it would cost a lot to find out in court.It can’t be the component cost involved: it’s a handful of cheap parts. It’s also not rocket science to implement. I think there are some patents preventing the implementation of this feature. Like this one from Texas Instruments:
US10110181B2 - Class-D amplifier with post filter feedback loop - Google Patents
A fixed frequency class-D audio amplifier includes the L-C output filter in a high order feedback loop. An audio amplifier integrated circuit includes an output driver, an output terminal, a first input terminal, a second order filter, and a summing amplifier. The output driver is configured to...patents.google.com
If so, we’ll have to wait until 2037 or until someone finds another way. It’s interesting that TI would hog the patent, since it’s mostly their chips used in these kind of amps. They could easily make the patent free to use around their own products and create more demand by doing so.
So if covered by patents, it brings up another controversial point about the recently tested 3E audio amps: are they legal?
It's crazy to be in the HiFi hobby today. This guy at $300 + a pair of Ascend Acoustics CBM-170SE at $368, total $668 and you have a very high fidelity system. That's a streamer, DAC, looks to be a very basic DSP in there as there is EQ, integrated amp, and a pair of excellent speakers.
This is a system a college student can afford.
You seem to have been a particularly murderous student back in the dayThe college student spending $668 on a stereo is someone I would have liked to be friends with in school.
You seem to have been a particularly murderous student back in the day
Not really. They are amplifiers and should do that properly within their respective design envelope. It is easily possible for very cheap chip amps to perform nicely with proper design. I earlier linked to an amp costing about a third of the Wiim amp that doesn't have load variance.