Count Dacula
Active Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2023
- Messages
- 133
- Likes
- 71
As long as you have the components grouped together, you can look at it as an average failure rate at X duration or capacity. Binding posts fail less often than power supplies, but if you ran a few gigawats thru them....
Just like each mechanical part is engineered for a lifespan and price point, each electronic part is similarly constructed. There is a congruity between these two systems. I'll stand by my analogy in the narrow way it serves my point. Just like the top fuel methanol dragster requires a rebuild after mere seconds of operation, an old chug-a-lug V8 or diesel can run for very extended times. Why this correlation of power consumption and efficiency to longevity wouldn't apply to electronic systems escapes me.
https://www.lisungroup.com/news/tec...dity-on-electronic-component-reliability.html
On this linear scale, we can clearly see the strong sensitivity to temperature. By increasing the device temperature by just 10°C, we have reduced the lifetime by over 2x. You may have heard a rule of thumb along the lines of a 50% lifetime decrease for each 10°C increase in channel temperature; that seems consistent with this formulation at this point in the Arrhenius curve. Even more significant, by increasing the temperature by 25°C from 225°C to 250°C, the lifetime dropped by almost an order of magnitude. This is equivalent to going from a ≈500 year lifetime to a ≈50 year lifetime on these devices, which will make operators of this device very happy if the lifetime ranges are a few times longer than a standard technology cycle.
Just like each mechanical part is engineered for a lifespan and price point, each electronic part is similarly constructed. There is a congruity between these two systems. I'll stand by my analogy in the narrow way it serves my point. Just like the top fuel methanol dragster requires a rebuild after mere seconds of operation, an old chug-a-lug V8 or diesel can run for very extended times. Why this correlation of power consumption and efficiency to longevity wouldn't apply to electronic systems escapes me.
https://www.lisungroup.com/news/tec...dity-on-electronic-component-reliability.html
Electronic components are sensitive to temperature changes, which may reduce their longevity and efficiency. Let’s take a closer look at how temperature affects the operation of various electrical parts:
Thermal Expansion and Contraction: Temperature fluctuations that occur during operation put electronic components at danger of thermal expansion and contraction. It is possible for cyclic stress to cause mechanical fatigue, which may then lead to taking this joints, broken wire bonds, and delamination. When these processes are accelerated up by heat, there is a greater likelihood that individual components may fail.
On this linear scale, we can clearly see the strong sensitivity to temperature. By increasing the device temperature by just 10°C, we have reduced the lifetime by over 2x. You may have heard a rule of thumb along the lines of a 50% lifetime decrease for each 10°C increase in channel temperature; that seems consistent with this formulation at this point in the Arrhenius curve. Even more significant, by increasing the temperature by 25°C from 225°C to 250°C, the lifetime dropped by almost an order of magnitude. This is equivalent to going from a ≈500 year lifetime to a ≈50 year lifetime on these devices, which will make operators of this device very happy if the lifetime ranges are a few times longer than a standard technology cycle.
Device Reliability - How Temperature Affects Mean Time to Failure
There are a variety of factors that go into device reliability, but often underappreciated is the thermal contribution.
jetcool.com