• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Most beautiful speakers in the world ?

So Basically Slate is hardened mud? ;)
I guess aluminum is still the the best material :cool: View attachment 425691
Yeah, speakers that are only made of very old mud from the neighbourhood! ;)
But after such a long time, their sound is no longer muddy at all, but bone-dry!:p

"For almost a half a billion years, Mother Nature has compressed and shaped soil from a dim and distant past into solid rock. Soil from an era not even showing any traces of dinosaurs, who themselves, have been extinct for aeons. The rock in question is still around today: SLATE"

According to Thomas Fischer, slate has extraordinary acoustic properties, so it's a very good enclosure material for loudspeakers. And I can confirm that if I knock on the cabinet, all I hear is a dry toc, and no matter how loud the music is playing, the slate cabinets are completely quiet, with no resonance whatsoever.

And yeah, they are heavy!

This is the advert on the F&F homepage, which is the source of the above. (see MENU -> MATERIAL & TECHNOLOGY).
 
One of the nicest looking speakers I owned were Hales Transcendence 5s. Back in the 90s/early 2000s I felt they were ahead of their time somewhat in terms of contemporary looks, build quality and fit and finish.

(photos from the web)

View attachment 424621

Though my pair had much nicer Pau Ferro wood finish like these larger Transcendence 8s:

View attachment 424622

The transcendence eights would’ve been my “ endgame” speakers, I think, if only they would’ve fit in my room.

I do have my endgame centre channel though, the Hales Transcendence Cinema Center - my favourite Central channel I’ve ever heard (and a big mother!)

View attachment 424625

Which mate seamlessly with my Hales Transcendence T1s which do L/R duty in my surround set up:

View attachment 424624

Not a fan of the finish in that photo as my T-1 are finished in the much nicer Pau Ferro finish that matches the centre channel.

Hales Design (Paul hales first company) weren't just nice looking speakers, but pretty good ones too, nicely engineered with good components. Pity this little californian firm disapppeard quickly. Paul Hales has done a hazardous and unfortunate deal in selling both the company and the brand name to Wadia's owners. Soon after, Wadia went off the market, driving Hales Design speakers in its collapsing. Too bad for Paul Hales and for muisc lovers who, like me, appreciate serious speaker design, far away from audiophile hype.
 
Hales Design (Paul hales first company) weren't just nice looking speakers, but pretty good ones too, nicely engineered with good components. Pity this little californian firm disapppeard quickly. Paul Hales has done a hazardous and unfortunate deal in selling both the company and the brand name to Wadia's owners. Soon after, Wadia went off the market, driving Hales Design speakers in its collapsing. Too bad for Paul Hales and for muisc lovers who, like me, appreciate serious speaker design, far away from audiophile hype.
Paul Hales went on to start two other audio companies:


 
Hales Design (Paul hales first company) weren't just nice looking speakers, but pretty good ones too, nicely engineered with good components. Pity this little californian firm disapppeard quickly. Paul Hales has done a hazardous and unfortunate deal in selling both the company and the brand name to Wadia's owners. Soon after, Wadia went off the market, driving Hales Design speakers in its collapsing. Too bad for Paul Hales and for muisc lovers who, like me, appreciate serious speaker design, far away from audiophile hype.

Yep, I definitely remember, I was in the middle of reviewing the Hales T5s when the company went under!

I spent something like a year trying to contact them saying “ How do I get these back to you?” until I was finally told basically “keep them, the company no longer exists.”

Which is how I ended up with a pair of T5s, inadvertently. But I thought they were awesome.

Much later on when I was putting together my Home Theatre system I knew the Hales sound is what I was looking for, and that they had made some stand mounted versions of the transcendence line - T1s. They were as rare as hen’s teeth on the used market because so few were made before the company shut down.

I ended up getting in touch with Paul Hales about them and it turned out he had a pair that he occasionally used in his office, and was willing to sell them to me. So that’s how I ended up with my first pair of T1s.

I had talked to Paul about how I was attracted to his loudspeakers because they seem to be particularly good at reproducing the timber of voices and instruments in a way that struck me as right and realistic. He said that was essentially his own obsession when he had been designing loudspeakers, so no surprise. But I also mentioned that if I could fault them for anything it was In the realm of dynamics. Just a bit on the polite side.
He agreed, said he felt the same way about those designs, which is why he was moving on to investigating designs based on re-creating more realistic dynamics. so he was starting to do stuff looked more like professional monitors, with horns, etc. And I seemed to remember his next business tended to cater more to that type of market - dynamic capability was desired or required.

I’ve never heard any of his speakers since Hales originally folded. But I would never get rid of my Hale’s centre channel. That’s for sure. It manages to sound at once tonally realistic, relaxed and not biting or artificial at all, especially with voices, and yet maintains discrimination even at low volumes, so dialogue is easy to hear without having to crank things up.
 
Absolutely awful looking speakers and weird and unaccurate acoustic design (these double tweeters and medium horns should produce comb filtering, hence a very narrow directivity and uneven FR). How to waste excellent and pricey TAD drivers in building those monsters !
Read the PDF, perhaps? Doesn't look that bad to me...
1738653461108.png
 
Read the PDF, perhaps? Doesn't look that bad to me...
View attachment 425957
this graph is misleading, it's not a measurement but a very optimistic simulation of predicted corrected response, they specifically turned off the spectrum "before". Basically any speaker will look like that in Dirac prediction. I'm not saying they're bad, how would I know, but if this is the only graph they've put in the PDF, then that should tell something.

edit: they showed the response before the correction, not pretty but this is more of a room response than speaker
Screenshot 2025-02-04 at 10.35.14.png
 
Last edited:
Not sure if sound beautiful, but IMO at least very interesting designs. Small company Audio Conception. From Czech with love :D.


stranka-exclusive-v1-ES-NOVINKA.jpg
STRANKA-LEGEND-EXTREME-.jpg
STRANKA-AMADEUS-INTERIER-KRYTY.jpg
 
Anybody here ever enjoyed a lowther speaker?

I don’t have a ton of experience, but I’ve heard several over the years. I always kind of enjoy the experience, it’s an interesting sound. But typically with sonic deficits that I could never live with.
 

If I'm not mistaken, the first two are multidirectional designs. I heard a multidirectional Lowther at T.H.E. Show in Las Vegas roughly two decades ago and enjoyed it.

The first one makes the most sense to me, as there will be a longer time-delay before the arrival of the output from the up-and-rear-firing driver, and ime that time delay is beneficial.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom