@pierre is doing the Lord’s work with his site. It might just be the single most valuable resource for rational audiophiles, seeing as speakers are comfortably the most important part of the chain.
Something bothered me about the KEF data, there is an on-axis drop above 5kHz that I didn’t perceive at all when listening.
So I took a look at the estimated in-room response to get a sense for what might be happening there.
Non-Klippel measurement caveats aside, that is one of the smoothest predicted in-room responses I’ve come across. Whatever the issue is anechoically and on-axis it doesn’t show up in-room. Now the steepness of the slope was bothering me, as it looked a lot steeper than the Genelec 8351b that I am weighing the LS60 against.
The KEF seems to drop about 10dB from 20-20k whereas the Genelec is more like 5dB. The Blade One has almost the same response as the LS60. The Kii Three and Dutch and Dutch 8c are even flatter than the Genelec and seem to prioritise flat on axis at the expense of a smooth predicted in-room response. So I thought I’d try a midfield monitor instead. Turns out the Genelec S360 is much closer to the two KEFs, when it comes to slope steepness.
In conclusion:
- With the caveat of the data being vendor provided and potential bass limiting at high volumes, is there an objectively better performing speaker out there for anywhere near the same money?
-Are some studio monitors with an almost flat in-room response (as opposed to sloping down) less well suited to midfield listening as a result?
-I (and, judging by the length of this thread, many others) really want to see the LS60 on
@amirm’s Klippel.
PS you should all check out
@pierre‘s
site.