jaakkopetteri
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2022
- Messages
- 269
- Likes
- 183
The Flex 8 only accepts stereo in, no?But for this application, the standard flex 8 would also work, connected over usb to HTCP (I suspect this model to be cheaper).
The Flex 8 only accepts stereo in, no?But for this application, the standard flex 8 would also work, connected over usb to HTCP (I suspect this model to be cheaper).
I believe these sort of HDMI splitters can only be configured to tell the source device which formats are supported. So it could tell the TV that it needs PCM for example. Whether the TV is able to deliver that or not is another question.This device may also work as an decoder: https://feintech.eu/products/vsp01202-hdmi-2-0-splitter-1x2-mit-audio-edid-management
You can do equally as good, if not better with MSO as long as you're willing to put in the time and effort to learn how to use it. That's worth saving $350. But you need one output channel per subwoofer for MSO so that eats into the channel count of the Flex HT :/Why not support DLBC? Besides, eight channels are really not enough.
If required, I would see little harm using a separate 2x4HD for subs to spare some channelsYou can do equally as good, if not better with MSO as long as you're willing to put in the time and effort to learn how to use it. That's worth saving $350. But you need one output channel per subwoofer for MSO so that eats into the channel count of the Flex HT :/
Dirac is at least as good as the Anti-Mode. For manual tuning with a UMIK and possibly MSO there's a bit of a learning curve, but shouldn't be a big deal getting results similar to the Anti-ModeThis product really piqued my interest! My living room setup currently consists of LG C9 as a source, DSPeaker Anti-Mode 2.0 Dual Core processor/DAC, Genelec F One (A) and a pair of Genelec 8020B's. Anti-Mode is connected with optical cable. I'm pretty happy with the setup although I have been thinking about possibly upgrading to bigger Genelecs. I love the room correction on the Anti-Mode but the volume control is a hassle. Would this unit be able to do the same (and possibly more) than the Anti-Mode unit in my use case.
Am I fooling myself that any (upstream) device to make use out of miniDSP flexHT needs to have dual (2x simultaneous) HDMI outputs?An automatic hdmi 2.1 switch in front of this one to allow for expansion
Here's one possible setup w/o the need for dual HDMI out:Am I fooling myself that any (upstream) device to make use out of miniDSP flexHT needs to have dual (2x simultaneous) HDMI outputs?
There is no pass-thru HDMI, only an input. Odd...
And, I was not able to find any details (even in company FAQ) whether this flextHT is HDMI2.1, and/or HDCP2.2, and/or 10bit HDR.
Any upstream @4K (that is running >HDMI2.0) may have to adapt. Odd...![]()
I agree. I got a Shield Pro for my LG tv about 2 or 3 years ago because the LG tv did not do DTS. The Shield Pro converts DTS to LPCM. The chain would be the diagram above by staticV3, except the Apple TV is replaced with the Shield Pro, and only gives stereo. I only use stereo when I do this.I do believe the Shield will decode and output LPCM. What a great device. Mine is still going strong from 2015 as our bedroom Kodi box.
I would personally make the comparison with the Cinema 70s due to the form factor, and even then the Flex HT is a lot smaller. Also has way better audio quality (audibility of course questionable), more capable room correction (Dirac + MSO), and WiSa (if they ever come up with separate receiver modules...). I guess nothing prevents making simple upsampling filters with the Flex HT eitherDo we know a price yet?
A marantz cinema 60 is just 1100€ and comes with full decoding and surround upsampling , build in amps with preouts and room correction.
If the Flex HT is nearly 1000€ in price it’s hard to justify getting it over a proper AVR
WiSA is a nice addition and could be the main reason some people will get it.I would personally make the comparison with the Cinema 70s due to the form factor, and even then the Flex HT is a lot smaller. Also has way better audio quality (audibility of course questionable), more capable room correction (Dirac + MSO), and WiSa (if they ever come up with separate receiver modules...). I guess nothing prevents making simple upsampling filters with the Flex HT either![]()
so exactly what movies will output 5.1/7.1 LPCM from Apple TV so that I can use the flex HT for 5.1/7.1 dirac live processing??Here's one possible setup w/o the need for dual HDMI out:
View attachment 285925
And in case your TV doesn't have an eARC port, you could use an HDMI eARC extractor to send the video to your TV and the audio to the Flex.
They're inexpensive little boxes.
All of them. Anything that is not Atmos is already output as LPCM and if you change the settings to 'Atmos off' any Atmos encoded films will be output as 7.1 LPCM.so exactly what movies will output 5.1/7.1 LPCM from Apple TV so that I can use the flex HT for 5.1/7.1 dirac live processing??
Looks like the Flex HT would be winner for my situation then. I can still use my node to stream music over its digital outputs to the Flex HT and use Dirac Live room correction which will definitely be a step up from basic sub crossover that comes with the node.All of them. Anything that is not Atmos is already output as LPCM and if you change the settings to 'Atmos off' any Atmos encoded films will be output as 7.1 LPCM.
The HT lacks a 12v trigger out. No way to wake up the amp when ARC HDMI of the HT turns on the TV and the apple Tv.