tomasai911
Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2023
- Messages
- 25
- Likes
- 8
What dac is in the minidsp Flex HT?? ESS 9028?? I am assuming it is not the same as the one in the 2-channel minidsp Flex version since it has 8 analog outputs.
-
Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Coming soon: MiniDSP Flex with HDMI input
- Thread starter al2002
- Start date
staticV3
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
- Messages
- 12,302
- Likes
- 20,419
The Flex Eight uses an ES9080Q, so chances are the HT does, too.
I have yet to see a teardown of one online though.
tomasai911
Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2023
- Messages
- 25
- Likes
- 8
Flex: SNR@120dB(A)
Flex HT: SNR @128dB(A), THD+N @ -111dB (0.0003%)
This is on their web spec pages and seems to indicate another dac similar to ES9028Q for the Flex HT, which they already use for SHD series
Flex HT: SNR @128dB(A), THD+N @ -111dB (0.0003%)
This is on their web spec pages and seems to indicate another dac similar to ES9028Q for the Flex HT, which they already use for SHD series
staticV3
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
- Messages
- 12,302
- Likes
- 20,419
Flex Eight and Flex HT have identical specs for their DACs (111dB SINAD, 125dB(A) DR).
We know from teardowns that the Flex Eight uses an ES9080Q.
It is therefore highly likely that the HT, too, uses an ES9080Q.
tomasai911
Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2023
- Messages
- 25
- Likes
- 8
Ok then minidsp Flex HT has a typo on their online spec page then regarding SNR if they are exactly the same dacs.
For a near 2024 product release, would make more sense they would to go with 9028 series dac chip.
Will soon find out when it is released for public end user review.
Using the 8 channel DAC in 2 channel mode will likely increase SNR. Curious, though is that the chip is speced with a 108 SINAD.
Edit:
This explains it… sort of.
The flex eight runs two chips, so 2x4 channels.
For the normal flex I actually found PCM1795: https://www.diy-hifi-forum.eu/forum...m-miniDSP-FLEX&p=326005&viewfull=1#post326005 though this would not match the specs either.
Edit:
This explains it… sort of.
The flex eight runs two chips, so 2x4 channels.
For the normal flex I actually found PCM1795: https://www.diy-hifi-forum.eu/forum...m-miniDSP-FLEX&p=326005&viewfull=1#post326005 though this would not match the specs either.
Last edited:
jaakkopetteri
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2022
- Messages
- 270
- Likes
- 183
STOCK UPDATE(19/07/2023): This product is currently in final stages of firmware development to finalize HDMI test. We expect shipments to start in the coming Q3 2023. Thanks for your patience!
Any chance they will also offer a 3, or 4 channel version so people who only need 2.1 (a true 2.1 using the 3rd channel for the subout) don't have to pay for 5 extra channels that will idle from day 1 to day infinity...? As far as I know, no one is doing a 3 channel dac with HDMI input that can be used with Dirac Live DLBC PC standalone version. I have been searching for one before I pay for the DLBC license. There are the likes of the MOTU M4 but those are really for the pro applications.
Source please?
jaakkopetteri
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2022
- Messages
- 270
- Likes
- 183
Sorry, I thought it obvious enough
miniDSP Flex HT
miniDSP Flex HT, 400MHz Sharc DSP audio processor, 8ch DAC, toolbox for subwoofer or multiway speaker tuning, USB/HDMI ARC/EARC, WISA, Optional Multichannel Dirac Live license for room correction,
Yeah I looked it up and came back to say never mind. I thought you had some sort of inside information.Sorry, I thought it obvious enough
miniDSP Flex HT
miniDSP Flex HT, 400MHz Sharc DSP audio processor, 8ch DAC, toolbox for subwoofer or multiway speaker tuning, USB/HDMI ARC/EARC, WISA, Optional Multichannel Dirac Live license for room correction,www.minidsp.com
I‘m really worried about the price.
For 1100€ you can already get a 11.4 channel Denon X3800 which has all the decoding, 9 channels of amplification, 4 individual sub outs and music streaming build in.
Yes, the flex has a nice small case but what’s really the benefit of the flex HT? (Don’t just tell me it’s higher SINAD)
For 1100€ you can already get a 11.4 channel Denon X3800 which has all the decoding, 9 channels of amplification, 4 individual sub outs and music streaming build in.
Yes, the flex has a nice small case but what’s really the benefit of the flex HT? (Don’t just tell me it’s higher SINAD)
cong314159
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2021
- Messages
- 4
- Likes
- 3
For me personally, it's going to be the matrix mixer, PEQ, and crossover.
For advanced PEQ, matrix mixing and speaker correction above Schröder (with given spin data) it’s a good device.
It has its applications but it‘s not a replacement for a decent AVR in a normal home theatre setup imho.
Peter Chuang
Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2022
- Messages
- 16
- Likes
- 2
is it possible to combine 2 unbalanced channels as one balanced output?
- Thread Starter
- #178
Hi Peng. Not sure I understand. 2.1 requires 3 channels, this has 8. Would you mind explaining?
i can’t speak for MiniDSP, but I doubt they can add HDMI out. There is not much space on the rear panel for additional connectors. if you need an HDMI out, just add a splitter in front of the flex.
i can’t speak for MiniDSP, but I doubt they can add HDMI out. There is not much space on the rear panel for additional connectors. if you need an HDMI out, just add a splitter in front of the flex.
There is no problem with 8 channels, that is > 3 channels, but I am not willing to pay for 8 channels when I will never use more than 3 (okay may be 4 if I want to add a second sub) channels. About the space issue, there should be room to add HDMI out if the DAC has 3 to 4 channels only. The micro HDMI connectors may also be an option.
- Thread Starter
- #180
Ah, so you are looking for an HDMI in/out version of the 4 channel Flex. Send MiniDSP a request. You never know……
it seems one could easily do this with existing hardware, but it would not be a one box solution.
it seems one could easily do this with existing hardware, but it would not be a one box solution.
Similar threads
