I don't know anything about the Bluesound Node.<elided>
@DonH56 , can you add some insights to this? Short summary is that the Bluesound Node Icon is a balanced differential source with a floating earth ground. People are getting ground loops with XLR connections which can be homebrewed reduced but not eliminated by tying RCA shields to earth ground, etc.
How does it work when you have a mix of floating ground source with three prong amplifier/active speaker. We usually think of unbalanced connections as being more susceptible to ground loops, but in this case, it sounds like switching to unbalanced connections reduces the hum.
Resolving Ground Loop Noise Issues with the NODE ICON and XLR Connections
The Bluesound NODE ICON is a two-plug power product with no ground. It has a floating ground as it is the preferred grounding style for audiophiles. The NODE ICON does not have the provision to con...support1.bluesound.com
Looks like they officially said, go figure it out on your own, we aren't changing our "audiophile" design.
Right, but I have been able to take the Panasonic UB9000 and Marantz PM-90 that Amir tested (which I sent in) and got similar SINAD measurements using my E1DA Cosmos.But then again can't compare 2 manufacturers this way since we don't know their test params.
$330 vs $999
Just more generically ground loops, and XLR pin 1 when there is no chassis ground. I have read not to tie to signal ground while others say that tying it to signal ground helps reduce noise.I don't know anything about the Bluesound Node.
If you look at the Node Icon, they say they have a dual mono DAC design. Since they are using stereo DACs, might they be using the two channels of audio to generate the +/- signal? Looking at the pin outs from the IC itself, it looks like it has separate grounds."Balanced" can be implemented with a pair of op-amps that are ground referenced but opposite in polarity, or one active stage with the other side simply a resistor (or resistor + capacitor) to ground that provides equal (balanced) impedance.
it is virtually impossible to test all use cases so difficult to test.
It depends upon the circuit implementation, which is unknown in this case (at least by me). Best RFI rejection will be when the shield is grounded at both ends, but raising it at one end to break a ground loop is pretty common. And often indicates a poor implementation at one end or the other.Just more generically ground loops, and XLR pin 1 when there is no chassis ground. I have read not to tie to signal ground while others say that tying it to signal ground helps reduce noise.
I am not sure the standard, though AES has something on it. Best practice with a properly-implemented design is to use a shield plus ground wire with no connection to the pin 2/3 signal lines, but again what works depends upon what the manufacturer did, and that varies. Additionally, it depends upon the transmitter (source) and receiver so how components interact comes into play. Likely not a single answer for all.Is there an official standard or best practice?
Again, don't know anything about the Node specifically, and just don't care enough to try to find out. I am not surprised the IC has separate signal returns for each DAC, but then it's up to the product designer for final implementation. Whatever they did, if safety/chassis ground is not completely isolated from signal return (ground) paths there is a potential loop that depends upon how the Node and whatever it's attached to implement the circuit. It is not just the Node in play here.If you look at the Node Icon, they say they have a dual mono DAC design. Since they are using stereo DACs, might they be using the two channels of audio to generate the +/- signal? Looking at the pin outs from the IC itself, it looks like it has separate grounds.
No idea, but they certainly cannot test with every product out there. HDMI is so loosely spec'd that interoperability is a nightmare (as many can attest). I do not know if there's a consumer standard for XLR connector ground isolation, but even if there is, ground problems are so common that it's practically irrelevant.That makes sense why it seems so inconsistent. Presumably like HDMI CEC, they just test with a few popular products and in house products.
This is already described in the technical white paper including measurements.So it’ll be interesting to see how QRONO affects things.
The technical white paper, being generous, gives a measurement of one filter. QRONO is at least supposed to be more than one filter. We actually don’t know if that filter is ever actually used by QRONO (a number of MQA filters seemed never to be selected in practice)This is already described in the technical white paper including measurements.
Or what other measurements do you expect?
This is already described in the technical white paper including measurements.
Or what other measurements do you expect?
You wonder why people say Lenbrook agents are posting hon this thread?This is already described in the technical white paper including measurements.
Or what other measurements do you expect?
And hereYou wonder why people say Lenbrook agents are posting hon this thread?
They want a little of leakiness because they say that only affects test tones not real music.This is already described in the technical white paper including measurements.
Or what other measurements do you expect?
Agreed. @pogo, your posts are super helpful including pointing people to updates on Dirac.You wonder why people say Lenbrook agents are posting hon this thread?
Shit design then, everybody should not buy the Node... then they'll fix the design flaw. What lousy engineers do they have working for them?What a stupid answer they gave, they basically got the design wrong.
It's full of double insulated devices that obviously don't have "hum" issues.
I understood this differently, i.e. the icon is more flexible at this point.I guess from Don’s posts, there’s enough inconsistency with balanced outputs that we don’t know if it’s broken or just incompatible
No.I know you don’t work for Lenbrook, but does anyone in your family or extended family have a potential conflict of interest, such as being a retailer or supplier to Lenbrook?
I don't know why you say this. An earlier post said that Bluesound's solution of grounding via RCA did not make the hum with XLR go away completely. If your amp has only XLR inputs it seems the only option is to return the Icon, unless Bluesound comes up with a better remedy.I understood this differently, i.e. the icon is more flexible at this point.
If your amp has only XLR inputs it seems the only option is to return the Icon, unless Bluesound comes up with a better remedy.
I did not since I already packed and returned it. I don't even have an RCA to plug into. Genelec speakers don't have RCA and nor did I have RCA to XLR cables and frankly I was not gonna attach a grounding to all 3 of my genelecs via their AES connection.Btw...have you tried their suggested "resolution" with RCA?