I doubt I would buy one or two, but it was the setup for the next question — what can we find that is truly a demonstration of what can be done as opposed to what should be done, in this case, maybe the argument is that it costs $74.5k to go from 121 to 125 dB A weighted SNR.
There’s another way to look at it. Imagine going to Bruno Putzeys and saying, “hey, you know how you can parallel DACs to lower noise? Can you parallel HypeX or PuriFi modules?” and then you’d learn about the Marantz bridged NC500OEMs. “I just won the lottery, can you design me the best amp module you can? I’m not worried about the cost — just make it the best.” And Bruno would say: “I could, but I just don’t have time with my day job.” And that’s when you say: “well, how about I pay you a year’s salary to do it?”
They probably sell a handful of these preamps and what you are really paying are the salaries of the engineers.
Expensive cables? Snake oil that takes advantage of people with money.
Ultra performance gear? The people with money are essential patrons of the arts, in this case, the art of audio engineering.
When something like this preamp comes out, it now challenges the ordinary mass market companies like Topping to try to match that performance for less…
I like the KH420 but if you saw my initial post, assume you already got all the other stuff like cars.
The KH420 wouldn’t qualify as best at any cost.
View attachment 425011
At 106 dB at one meter, it already is clipping the tweeter and bass is rolling off around 50 Hz. Once you get to the >6m listening distance, it drops and drops. I would disqualify based upon inability to go down to 20 Hz.
View attachment 425012
The Genelec is rated to the higher listening distances than the KH420, but even then it’s rolling off before it his 20 Hz. It is phase linear to 300 Hz
View attachment 425013
But something like the Meyer Sound Bluehorn has similar frequency response flatness but is phase linear to at least 25 Hz.
View attachment 425014
It’s very likely that the Magico’s are good based upon other products
View attachment 425015
But don’t forget that a pair of M9 loudspeakers requires two stereo or four monaural amplifiers.
But is the Varase actually the system to go? Presumably you are better off with Accuphase SACD player going into the DG-68 for room tuning, or even a Sony UHD BD player going into Trinnov via HDMI-PCM conversion and then using the Trinnov’s AES digital out into a stack of those 28-bit DACs coming out for each of the two channels.
This came across my Facebook feed. It's a company based in California that's claiming 28-bit true performance. The link just leads to a landing page with a few quotes from professional engineers. The fact they are announcing/showing it at AES instead of launching it at an audiophile show...
www.audiosciencereview.com