• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Myryad Z210 Review (CD Player)

NTTY

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
657
Likes
2,693
Location
Switzerland
Hello Everyone,

This is a review and detailed measurements of the Myryad Z210 CD Player.

Myryad-Z210_001.jpg


For once, I go to more modern gear than I usually review, and that was an opportunity (budget wise) to get to know this brand.


Myryad Z210 - Presentation

As you can tell from the front face, this British CD player offers the minimum (no phones out), to focus on performances, and was presented as an "audiophile" device. It was released in 2013 as part of the "Z200" series also including an integrated amplifier and a tuner. The retail price was relatively high, roughly $1'000+.

The front face is made of thick aluminium as well as the buttons. No plastic can be seen from the outside, that gives it a touch of luxury.

The back panel exhibits the essential too:

Myryad-Z210_002.jpg


We find a pair of RCA outs and only one digital output (Coax - I personally prefer optical).

Let's have a look at the inside which is simple and neat:

Myryad-Z210_003.jpg


On the left side the linear power supply, an ASATech drive in the middle (I suppose DVD type drive, with servo control below it), and the conversion board on the right.

Let's have a look at the proprietary muti-layers main board:

Myryad-Z210_004.jpg


We can't see the DAC which is a Cirrus Logic CS4392.
(With upgraded glasses): We can see the DAC, which is a Cirrus Logic CS4392, bottom right just above the Xtal.

Compared to the Sony CDP-557ESD which I previously reviewed, the drawer is extremely slow to open and close. But the drive is quick to skip tracks, which I always appreciate with my test CD, having often to skip 10 or 20 tracks at once. The buttons on the front are not plaisant to use as they have a metallic sound which is not really luxurious.

Funny note: the person who sold it asked me what was my current CD player. When I replied I had a 37 years old Sony player (thinking of the CDP-557ESD, which was the first to come to my mind), he mentioned that I should "...see a huge improvement, such as much wider soundstage...". So let's see in the measurements if I can find that wide open soundstage :)


Myryad Z210 - Measurements (Analog Out)

All measurements performed with a Cosmos E1AD (grade G).

I am now consistent with my specific measurements for CD Players, as I described them in the post “More than we hear”, and as I reported them for the Onkyo C-733 review. Over time, this will help comparing the devices I reviewed.

The Myryad outputs 2Vrsm from its RCA outputs. The two channels were very well balanced (less than 0.02dB), which is very good. The single-ended outputs are non-inverting.

As usual, let's start with my standard 999.91Hz sine @0dBFS (without dither) from the Test CD (RCA out):

MyryadZ210_999.91Hz_0dBFS_LR.jpg


Left and right channels are shown but only one gets evaluated in the dashboard. Both channels have similar performances, though. Plot is on H2 (-103dBr and -107dBr).
Right channel has a little more harmonic distortion, but nothing of concern.

Note that, around the fundamental, we get interaction with power supply with the lateral spikes you see on both sides. This is a very low level (below -110dBr) and so will be easily masked by music. Other than that, these are very good performances for a CD player (very close to the theoretical maximum of the format), just not best in class.

Next is the same view but at -6dBFS, as I usually show:

MyryadZ210_999.91Hz_-6dBFS_LR.jpg


The distortion has decreased in the left channel (-113dBr), not in the right one (where it remained at -102dBr). But in both cases, this is a very good result. The distortion is made of nearly only the second harmonic (H2) and so it will be easily masked. It is good to see random and correlated noise decreasing (by 1dB).

As per the datasheet of the Cirrus Logic DAC, the THD+N is -100dB at full scale (0dBFS), and -91dB @-20dBFS. This means the performance of this DAC improves with lower levels, and its THD+N is likely noise driven. Actually, the below view shows it. It is the same 999.91Hz sine, but at -1dBFS:

MyryadZ210_999.91Hz_-1dBFS_L.jpg


As you can see, if the signal has decreased by 1dB, but the THD+N remained nearly the same (decrease by 0.2dB). This means that a Full Scale signal generates noise in the converter. This is not a concern with CD Audio, with that type of noise.

I've seen this player is very silent at lower levels with minimum distortion. And again, the noise is the limiting factor. So, I wanted to analyze how deep we can go, with CD Audio and modern mastering techniques, that are using noise shaping. So I used a -40dBFS sine with rectangle dither (1/2LSB) and shape dither, and I overlaid the two results in the below view:

MyryadZ210_999.91Hz_-40dBFS.jpg


You can see that with shape dither, the noise floor is lowered by roughly 10dB (up to 6kHz), which means the resolution of this CD Player can reach 17.5bits, with the support of shape dither. That also means the dynamic range is roughly 105dB (unweighted but to 6kHz only) which is in line with the specs of the Cirrus Logic CS4392. So, after all, this is a very good implementation of that DAC in this player. Well done to Myryad.

You probably noticed a decently silent player, and we can zoom in from 20Hz to 1kHz:

MyryadZ210_PS_LR.jpg


We see very small spikes from mains (50Hz in Europe, and harmonics), but you can find two higher ones at 700Hz and especially 900Hz probably meaning a little interaction between the PS and the signal (seen mainly at or near full scale, as I mentioned above). Again, we are below -110dBr and close to the fundamental, so all of that will remain hidden to our ears. We shall be happy with this result, especially because I use a 512k FFT size and average 32 times which lowers very much the random noise in the view.

Next is the bandwidth:

MyryadZ210_BW.jpg


This is very flat (-0.2dB) and, like I said previously, the two channel are nearly matched in level which I like to see.

The Cirrus DAC includes the filtering which can theoretically be selected, and if the user can't select one via a button, Myryad has obviously chosen the sharp one:

MyryadZ210_Filtering.jpg


The blue line is from periodic white noise, up to 80kHz. The purple trace is the standard AES IDM test (18kHz+20kHz played at the same time).
I compared the result to what's published in the datasheet to find the same behaviour. The attenuation is -90dB, as documented by Cirrus Logic. I measured a stop band at 24.11kHz, again very precisely what Cirrus documented in its datasheet (0.454xFs).

What's not documented is the noise shaping technique in use here, and that we see kicking off at roughly 30kHz. This is standard for delta-sigma digital-to-analog conversion.

Next should be the multitone test which you and I like to see, but unfortunately I realised I forgot to save that measurement. I'll update this message the day I get back the Myryad on the bench.

Let's move on to the jitter test:

MyryadZ210_JTest.jpg


The red trace is from the digital output of the Myryad (Coax) while the blue one is from its analog output. Without the obvious interaction between the PS and the fundamental (again), this trace would have been perfect. That said, this is still very good and an interesting demonstration that jitter can find one of its source into noise spreading from the Power Supply. The lateral spikes are very low and very close to the fundamental, that means they will remain hidden to our ears.

Started with the Teac VRDS-20 review, and on your request + support to get it done (more here), I'm adding now an "intersample-overs" test which intends to identify the behavior of the digital filtering and DAC when it come to process near clipping signals. Because of the oversampling, there might be interpolated data that go above 0dBFS and would saturate (clip) the DAC and therefore the output. And this effect shows through distorsion (THD+N measurement up to 96kHz):


Intersample-overs tests
Bandwidth of the THD+N measurements is 20Hz - 96kHz
5512.5 Hz sine,
Peak = +0.69dBFS
7350 Hz sine,
Peak = +1.25dBFS
11025 Hz sine,
Peak = +3.0dBFS
Teac VRDS-20-30.7dB-26.6dB-17.6dB
Yamaha CD-1-84.6dB-84.9dB-78.1dB
Denon DCD-900NE-34.2dB-27.1dB-19.1dB
Denon DCD-SA1-33.6dB-27.6dB-18.3dB
Onkyo C-733-88.3dB-40.4dB-21.2dB
Denon DCD-3560-30.2dB-24.7dB-17.4dB
Myryad Z210-70.6dB (noise dominated)-71.1dB (noise dominated)-29.4dB (H3 dominated)

I kept some references and will keep the same for other reviews, so you can quickly compare. The results of the Myryad Z210 are a very good surprise. In fact, I have a dedicated test file where I can subsequently test resistance to inter-sample at +1.01dB, +2.01dB and +3.01dB, and the Maryad still achieved a THD+N of -68.3dB at +2.01dB. So that means the oversampling filter will not saturate before +2dB IS over, which is too rare. All of this is very good news if you listen to "hot masters", as the oversampling filter of the Myryad is unlikely to add distortion to the signal (no saturation up to +2dB overs).

Let's continue with the good old 3DC measurement that Stereophile was often using as a proof of low noise DAC. It is from an undithered 997Hz sine at -90.31dBFS. With 16bits, the signal should appear (on a scope) as the 3DC levels of the smallest symmetrical sign magnitude digital signal:

MyryadZ210_3DC_RCA.jpg


This is a good result even if I've seen a better. We get a little noise but we clearly recognize our 3DC levels as they should be represented, and the symmetry is equally good.

Other measurements (not shown):
  • IMD AES-17 DFD "Analog" (18kHz & 20kHz 1:1) : -98.1dB
  • IMD AES-17 DFD "Digital" (17'987Hz & 19'997Hz 1:1) : -108.4dB
  • IMD AES-17 MD (41Hz & 7993Hz 4:1): -78.1dB
  • IMD CCIF (19kHz & 20kHz 1:1) : -108.1dB
  • IMD DIN (250Hz & 8kHz 4:1) : -88.5dB
  • IMD SMPTE (60Hz & 7kHz 1:4) : -77.8dB
  • IMD TDFD Bass (41Hz & 89Hz 1:1) : -88.4dB
  • IMD TDFD (13'58Hz & 19841Hz 1:1) : -114.5dB
  • Dynamic Range : 97.5dB (without dither)
  • Crosstalk: -132dBr (100Hz), -120dBr (1khz), -104dBr (10kHz)
  • Pitch Error : 19'997.27Hz (19'997Hz requested) ie 13.5ppm
The above measurements are very good to the exception of those involving low frequencies. Indeed, for instance the IMD SMPTE (60Hz & 7kHz 1:4) shows an unusual "high" distortion result. Usually, CD players and their DACs suffer more with dual tones at high frequencies, not lower ones.

Let's have a look if this is confirmed by the sweep of THD vs Frequencies (@-12dBFS):

MyryadZ210_THDvsFreq_LR.jpg


Yes it is, the trace goes down instead of doing up as I usually see. The result at 1kHz (see the plot) is extremely good (actually the best by far that I measured), and at higher frequencies too. Note that for this review, I used the beta version of REW, and after many tests, it seems that this beta version performs better measurements with sweeps. Indeed, all the above results concur with my previous measurements (of unique sine as well as dual and triple tones).
All that said, these results show an unusual high level of distortion at low frequencies. So, let’s have a look at an FFT of a 100Hz test tone @0dBFS:

1745414702820.png


This is 14dB more in THD than at 1kHz, and so THD+N becomes harmonic distorsion dominated (by H2 actually) instead of being Noise dominated like it is usually the case with CD Audio players.

Why is that? I am not sure but, with the good intersample-overs resistance we saw before, I suspect special processing within the oversampling filter (maybe including upsampling to DSD?) which could explain this type of side effect.
I you have other ideas/suggestions, feel free to share.


Myryad Z210 - Measurements (Optical Out)

I've seen several of you reviewing CD players using their digital outputs, in case the results could be improved from an external DAC.

Because of the limited clock instability (only 14ppm), we get a stable digital output. It means I had no issue getting a constant reading without windowing errors in the FFT calculation , due to the absence of PLL to filter the clock deviations in this test, for up to 8 averages. With that, I can say that the digital output is as what we expect it to be, perfect (999.91Hz @0dBFS without dither):

MyryadZ210_999.91Hz_0dBFS_Coax.jpg


This is precisely what I obtained with the Sony CDP-557ESD previously reviewed and which is nearly 30 years older. Who said drives can sound different? :)


Myryad Z210 - Testing the drive

What would be good measurements if the drive would not properly read a slightly scratched CD, or one that was created at the limits of the norm? The below tests reply to these questions.

Test typeTechnical testResults
Variation of linear cutting velocityFrom 1.20m/s to 1.40m/sPass
Variation of track pitchFrom 1.5µm to 1.7µmPass
Combined variations of track pitch and velocityFrom 1.20m/s & 1.5µm to 1.40m/s & 1.7µmPass
HF detection (asymmetry pitch/flat ratio)Variation from 2% to 18%Pass
Dropouts resistanceFrom 0.05mm (0.038ms) to 4mm (3.080ms)Up to 1.25mm.
Combined dropouts and smallest pitchFrom 1.5µm & 1mm to 1.5µm & 2.4mmUp to 1mm.
Successive dropoutsFrom 2x0.1mm to 2x3mmUp to 1mm.

The drive was able to consistently continue playing, without generating typical digital clicks, with dropouts of up to 1.25mm. The interpolation effect remained hidden to my ears when it kicked-off but failed to maintain a constant flow beyond 1.5mm as I could hear couple of clicks, even if it did not stop playing. The Myryad had no issue with variable linear velocity and/or track pitch, as well as with HF detection. These results are similar to ancient Sony drives with KSS heads, so I consider them good.


Conclusion

I was not expecting anything special with this player. And so, the non-typical results of the Myryad are good news, on my perspective. The low distortion at high frequencies as well as the very good resistance to intersample-overs are both to be appreciated.

In addition, the total absence of visible distorsion at very low levels (ie -60dBFS) and low noise in that case are remarquable, even if not a first with good delta-sigma conversion. The player can resolve more than the CD Audio, but with shape dither, the limit of the DAC is reached at around 17.5bits, limited by low level noise.

If I initially laughed at the soundstage which would open, I must admit that the guaranteed low distortion of this player, from 300Hz on and with low level signals, were good surprises. Is it specific to that Cirrus Logic converter? Some further investigations (see below interactions with @Scytales) show it’s the case.

The higher than usual distortion at low frequencies, and the little random + correlated noise when playing high level tones, are the limiting factors. I think there's some sort of processing happening before conversion, and explaining the good resistance to IS overs).

And of course I listened to it, through a good old Accuphase C200X preamplifier (with OPPO PM3 headphones), and I could not spot anything unusual/abnormal. And no, sorry mister seller, the soundstage wasn't wider ;)

From all the above, I can recommend this CD player, if you get lucky enough to cross one.

Cheers
 
Last edited:
Thank you for this thorough review of the Myriad Z210 CD player, NTTY!

The measurement results are very interesting, indeed.

The peculiarities of the Cirrus Logic CS4392 DAC chip are obvious and probably explain the very long career of this old chip (still in production as of today after 25 years since the year of release of its original datasheet, even if it is with the "Not Recommended for New Designs" status).

Although the documentation published by Cirrus Logic does not explicitly states it, I believe the CS4392 is a 1 bit DAC, with a 128x interpolation filter from PCM input followed by a 5th order delta-sigma modulator and a switched capacitor output filter. I cannot understand otherwise the CS4392 datasheet, compared with earlier or more recent DAC datasheets of the same maker, as well as some third parties measurement results (including Amirm's about a device using a CODEC employing the same DAC architecture as the CS4392). Moreover, I once located on another forum a statement from Mr Dylan Hester, one of the Cirrus Logic engineers who designed the CS4392 DAC along the more elaborate CS4397, who claims that conversion into analogue from DSD input is pretty much a direct path, which to my mind confirms the implementation of a 1 bit switch-capacitor output stage of the same kind as that of the Philips TDA1547 "Bitstream" DAC.

It seems to me the interpolation filter and delta-sigma modulator in the CS4392 have been designed on a budget, with consideration to psycho-acoustic in mind in order to get the best possible result in the frequency band in where the human ear is the most sensitive at the expanse of the level of performance at the frequency extremes, where the ear is much less sensitive. That state of mind is in line with the reasoning of other ADC and DAC makers, taking into account the state of technology and manufacturing process (and cost!) some 25 to 30 years ago. I especially think about dCS (this reasoning is explained in the dCS904 professional ADC user manual from 2000).

The member of the technical staff at the Italian magazine Audioreview, who already made extensive measurements with an Audio Precision analyzer, highly praised the linearity of the CS4392 in the first implementations of this DAC they had tested. Your own measurement results seem to confirm that quality.

As far as noise or dynamic range is concerned, I would be very interested to see a modern implementation of this DAC chip that uses the trick proposed by Cirrus Logic in the evaluation board of this DAC and that, to my knowledge, has never been used as is by third parties : an instrumentation amplifier with some gain ahead of the post-DAC analogue low-pass filter to overcome the input noise of the latter in order to increase the dynamic range of the system.

I am looking forward to see your follow-up measurements !
 
Last edited:
Although the documentation published by Cirrus Logic does not explicitly states it, I believe the CS4392 is a 1 bit DAC, with a 128x interpolation filter from PCM input followed by a 5th order delta-sigma modulator and a switched capacitor output filter.
Sounds about right. And I think the datasheet suffers from copypasta disease - the recommended external circuitry remained unchanged from the CS4391, which I suspect is actually quite similar but with a lower-order modulator (probably 4th). As such, not one implementation manages to flatten out its ultrasonic noise floor. The Myriad is actually among the better ones. Budget CS4272-based audio interfaces can be quite gnarly... I'm thinking of the Behringers or the Arturia Minifuse whose headphone output managed to upset Amir's AP.

Another snag inherited from the CS4391 is the lack of a dedicated digital ground pin. That can really screw up the grounding and supply bypassing when the manufacturer decided to adapt an existing design with nicely separated analog and digital ground planes.

As to the funny business with low-frequency even-order distortion, I would want to take the multimeter or better the scope to the analog supply rails (TP1 and TP2, followed by the opamp power pins) and watch out for anything unusual happening when playing low-frequency content. It's almost like one of the regulators is sagging badly under load, bad solder joint or something. Shouldn't be hard to find a problem there, the power supply section for the analog supplies seems to be about as textbook as it gets - bridge rectifier, smoothing caps, LM317 and LM337 regulator pair to generate +/-14.9 V (with resistor values straight out of the datasheet). The 10µ/50s should be in parallel to the 2k4s with the bigger caps right next to them being output filters, but I might be mistaken.

The only other things that could potentially cause this would be a severe lack of bypassing on the DAC's +5V analog supply.

We can't see the DAC which is a Cirrus Logic CS4392.
You may want to get your glasses. ;) What about U14 (bottom right, above crystal oscillator can)?
 
Last edited:
Sounds about right. And I think the datasheet suffers from copypasta disease - the recommended external circuitry remained unchanged from the CS4391, which I suspect is actually quite similar but with a lower-order modulator (probably 4th). As such, not one implementation manages to flatten out its ultrasonic noise floor. The Myriad is actually among the better ones. Budget CS4272-based audio interfaces can be quite gnarly... I'm thinking of the Behringers or the Arturia Minifuse whose headphone output managed to upset Amir's AP.

[...]

As to the funny business with low-frequency even-order distortion, [...]

The only other things that could potentially cause this would be a severe lack of bypassing on the DAC's +5V analog supply.

The identical external low-pass filter circuit for the CS4392 than for the CS4391 in the datasheet of the former was perhaps considered as a feature, to point out that it was possible to replaced the CS4391 by the CS4392 in existing designs? The post-DAC filter on the evaluation board for the CS4392, to the contrary, is different from that found in the datasheet of said chip. The newer output filter design is similar in concept to the one proposed for the CS4398 DAC that have been released latter on. The newer filters have been designed, said Cirrus Logic, to have equal in-band impedance on each of the differential DAC outputs. On simulations, the two suggested filter designs for the CS4392 have about the same -3dB bandwidth of 50 kHz, save for a hint of a slight resonance prior the corner frequency that flattens the frequency response with the newer design, which, incidentally, provides about 3 dB greater attenuation at any frequency in the stop band.

The Miller Audio Research website gives an open access to detailed measurements of a disc player that uses the same CS4392 DAC chip, the Marantz DV-12S2 : www.milleraudioresearch.com/download/reports/feb04/marantzdv12s2.html

We can see THD analysis up to the fourth harmonics at 1 kHz and 20 Hz, and at 0 dBFS as well as -10 dBFS for 1 kHz.

The behavior of the Marantz player in the bass and the mid-band appears to be similar to that of the Myryad player : about -108 dB (0.0004 %) THD @ 1 kHz/0dBFS and -107 dB (0.00045 %) THD @ 1 kHz/-10 dBFS, but about -88 dB (0.004 %) THD @ 20 Hz/0 dBFS.

In the Marantz player, each CS4392 +5V analogue power supply pin is decoupled by a 100 µF through-hole capacitor whose + pin is about 10 mm away from the DAC supply pin and a surface-mounted 1 µF ceramic capacitor right at the DAC supply and ground pins, the +5V supply trace being taken from a vias at the component side of the + pin hole of the 100 µF capacitor on a double-sided printed circuit board. It's much more than the 1 µF + 0.1 µF recommanded in the CS4392 datasheet, but the use of through hole components is not recommanded by Cirrus Logic in its AN18 (rev.6) application note and the small value capacitor is lacking. Nevertheless, the decoupling seems hefty, yet the same effect as the one noted by NTTY is observable on the Miller Audio Research measurements.

It seems that the Myryad Z210 is very similar to the previous Myryad Z112, of which two different versions have apparently been released, as can be seen on the pictures of the inside in the following webpages :
It happens that Miller Audio Research has also measured the Z112 for the December 2007 issue of Hi-fi News (registration required to see the measurements) : http://www.milleraudioresearch.com/avtech/index.html

The Z112 test results correlate well with the measurements of the Z210 taken by NTTY. For instance : about -103 dB (0.0007 %) THD @ 1 kHz/0dBFS and -110 dB (0.0003 %) THD @ 1 kHz/-10 dBFS and -12 dBFS, and about -91 dB (0.0028 %) THD @ 20 Hz/0 dBFS.

The better filtering of the out of band noise by the Z112 compared to the earlier Marantz DV-12S2 is also visible: an improvement of about 20 dB.
 
Last edited:
The behavior of the Marantz player in the bass and the mid-band appears to be similar to that of the Myryad player : about -108 dB (0.0004 %) THD @ 1 kHz/0dBFS and -107 dB (0.00045 %) THD @ 1 kHz/-10 dBFS, but about -88 dB (0.004 %) THD @ 20 Hz/0 dBFS.
Very interesting. They indeed appear to be extremely close from each other. A lot of the measurements show the same results, and FFTs are alike. Thanks for the links!
 
Last edited:
NTTY,

You should consistently add the word 'review' to the title of your opening posts: that helps to find your reviews with the search engine. ;)

I just remembered you have tested the Marantz CD5400 that uses the very same CS4392 DAC.

Curiously, the -12 dBFS sweep THD test shows that the behavior of the Marantz player is the same as that of the Myryad up to 300 Hz, but deviates above that frequency.

Another curiosity is a lesser resistance of the Marantz to the inter-sample overs test. It seems there is more at work than the design of the onboard oversampling filter of the CS4392 to explains the results of the Myryad on the ISP test.
 
Last edited:
NTTY,

You should consistently add the word 'review' to the title of your opening posts: that helps to find your reviews with the search engine. ;)
I did not realize I stopped adding the word, thanks I updated the titles of my recent reviews ;)
I just remembered you have tested the Marantz CD5400 that uses the very same CS4392 DAC.

Curiously, the -12 dBFS sweep THD test shows that the behavior of the Marantz player is the same as that of the Myryad up to 300 Hz, but deviates above that frequency.

Another curiosity is a lesser resistance of the Marantz to the inter-sample overs test. It seems there is more at work than the design of the onboard oversampling filter of the CS4392 to explains the results of the Myryad on the ISP test.
Interesting indeed. I could overlay the results but it’d be best I measure again the Myryad with the same interface I used for the Marantz and the same version of REW (for the avoidance of doubts). I’m still surprised by the THD vs freq of the Myryad above 1kHz. It might be an effect of the beta version of REW. I’ll test again as there could be an incompatibility between my test file and this beta version of REW (the user guide warns about it).

But the Marantz was noisy, the Cirrus had little chances to shine. The behavior with low frequency is indeed the same, I just did not remember seeing it before. Well spotted!

When I’m back from abroad, I’ll get the Myryad back on the bench.
 
Last edited:
@Scytales, Update: I ran many tests and it simply looks like the beta version of REW is better at processing results from sweeps, which is good news. I updated the initial post with that.

Anyways, I installed the official latest release of REW to test and compare with the Marantz, as you mentioned. And have a look at the below overlay of the Myryad (Left and Right Channels) together with one channel from the Marantz:

MyryadZ210_THDvsFreq_LR_Marantz.jpg


The traces are identical. So that's indeed a behavior of the CS4392.
 
Thanks!

I am correct that you have compared some points of the sweep frequencies THD test curve with FFTs of the corresponding same frequencies and digital levels to draw the conclusion that the Beta version is more accurate with sweep frequencies THD ?

If I understand you correctly, you seem to believe that the above graph obtained with the latest official REW release might be a less accurate representation of the THD performance from the sweep test than the graph posted in the opening post that you get with the Beta release of the same software ?
 
Thanks!

I am correct that you have compared some points of the sweep frequencies THD test curve with FFTs of the corresponding same frequencies and digital levels to draw the conclusion that the Beta version is more accurate with sweep frequencies THD ?

Exactly!
You obviously think like I do :)

If I understand you correctly, you seem to believe that the above graph obtained with the latest official REW release might be a less accurate representation of the THD performance from the sweep test than the graph posted in the opening post that you get with the Beta release of the same software ?
Correct again.
I realized that the beta version of REW provides very accurate THD results with a simple sweep. So I compared with my single sine tests at 1kHz (@-12dBFS), including using the Sony CDP-557ESD, to find extremely close results.
This is good news because it will simplify the reviews, but also means I would have to update quite a number of some I previously did (when I still have the CD players).
 
Back
Top Bottom