Sure, he can. Already done.“hey, you know how you can parallel DACs to lower noise? Can you parallel HypeX or PuriFi modules?”
Sure, he can. Already done.“hey, you know how you can parallel DACs to lower noise? Can you parallel HypeX or PuriFi modules?”
What I meant to say is doing stuff like Octo-balancing them like DACs.Sure, he can. Already done.
OT: Unnecessary.What I meant to say is doing stuff like Octo-balancing them like DACs.
Only as unnecessary as that Soulution 727? A regular McIntosh amp is great but that doesn’t stop people from wanting the quad balanced models.OT: Unnecessary.
View attachment 425176
Since they haven’t been measured, I’m just going to conveniently assume they measure great![]()
Only as unnecessary as that Soulution 727? A regular McIntosh amp is great but that doesn’t stop people from wanting the quad balanced models.
My understanding is that every time you average two signals, you reduce noise by the square root of 2. So using something like imaging sensors as an example you can see how there are diminishing returns.
View attachment 425142
Maybe I can present it a different way. The Soulution can deliver 125 dB SNR. What would it take for an amp to deliver that at 1W to 1000W, understanding that at 1W, you would be delivering less than 125 dB of audio.
The MBL amps have been measured at Stereophile and are pretty impressive!
![]()
MBL Reference 9011 monoblock amplifier
As large as a small file cabinet and weighing 223 lbs, MBL's most powerful amplifier, the Reference 9011, is a tour de force of electronics design and implementation that will set you back $60,000 if you're a stereo enthusiast, or $120,000 if you like pure balanced mono.www.stereophile.com
“This amplifier has true 20-bit dynamic range.”
I have a ManAttic![]()
Just 7x4 meters because of sadle roof just around 55 cubic meters. Also reflection are odd needed badly DSP an some room treatment. Even de Vandies model 1 sounded better than the model 2.Same. 140" front projection is not out of proportion in this 22x24' barn.
If I won the lottery, I'd go see a lot more live music and sit in the primo seats for a change.
I would spend a lot more on going to concerts, supporting talented young musicians and good teachers, and campaign for the return of musical education in more schools. It seems to me that if I am doing music as a thing, that's much more important than sitting in front of a pair of million dollar speakers for a few hours a day.
Draw your own conclusions.Only as unnecessary as that Soulution 727? A regular McIntosh amp is great but that doesn’t stop people from wanting the quad balanced models.
View attachment 425176
Since they haven’t been measured, I’m just going to conveniently assume they measure great
I would likely hide away the amplifiers.
And even with lottery money, I would not be inclined to support the cable industry racket, so I’d either try basic competent cables and hide cables as I do now, or perhaps pay just enough so that the cables themselves aren’t ugly.
And I would do lots of entertaining! It would be really fun to have a system like this to blow the minds of guests.
Oh, I don’t think Soulution even thinks their performance is necessary. It’s just bragging rights.Draw your own conclusions.![]()
Just 7x4 meters because of sadle roof just around 55 cubic meters. Also reflection are odd needed badly DSP an some room treatment. Even de Vandies model 1 sounded better than the model 2.![]()
The average investment in a professional studio controll room is around 30:70 30% gear 70% room treatment. Don't forget that all vibrations outside like a variety of trafic has to be elimated don't know if that too is in the 70%. Than reflections/reverb time are dealt with. Guess what our average room sounds like in comparison.We all have struggles. I just calculated 118m^3 for my room, not including the volume above the suspended ceiling, but I've had issues getting the bass to sound right.
After running the room mode calculations, it turns out there is no reasonable combination of speaker placement and listening position that will fix this.This is actually a blessing in disguise because I am much less inclined to chase "upgrades": whatever incremental gains I might hope for over an already nice system are likely to be lost in the room, so why fight it?
As for the OP: if I won the lottery and was required to spend a hundred grand of it on home hi-fi (which I consider obscene), I'd probably spend $80k+ of it on the room and the remainder on, say, a pair of Dynaudio Focus 50 powered speakers and a selection of phono cartridges to play with.