Two they got explicitly nailed for is the cold calling collusion with other Silicon Valley giants, and the well known e-Book price fixing.
You should have said that before making statements as if legality is the end-all be-all discussion with respect to when it's fine, and when it isn't to support a company through investments and such.. And not the thing you said prior.
Then there was no point in making your ownership apparent and then making a claim right after that what one ought do if they don't like a particular policy Apple may have.
The first sentence here is a throwaway. What are you trying to say, that people don't have the right? Even if they didn't have "the right", they will have an impact in dictating that future, in the same way any demand will have an impact on future supply trends of an offering. Second, in the US it's not clear cut, but it's becoming more clear cut when the latest ruling even from a bias judge now forces Apple to allow linking of secondary payment methods. And the earlier legal pressure that made Apple come down on lower earner apps by lowering their share to 15% instead of the usual 30%. Even though people have no "right" to dictate these things, this is what working from a legal and economic perspective allows by force. Which conveniently also addresses the witty post about what "Yogi Berra said". Individuals eventually make their own rights.
Wait, but you say we have no right to tell them what they should do? Seems you sympathize with forcing Apple to do something with their private property now? But it's not 100% certain (which is why I concluded my prior post with a question about what you would desire, and not so much the pointless discussion about current legal states of affairs).
Apple being forced to use USB-C is going to happen even without this incoming deliberation on the matter. They can't stay with Lightening forever, and have already made an idiotic product with this iPhone 13 Pro Max I got sitting here. Able to record ProRes footage (with 4K chewing up around 6GB of data per minute) but still stuck with the retarded USB2 transfer speeds of Lightening.. There's no about of libertarian meme'ing that one can posit that will override the need to get Apple off this idiotic interface.
Has an odd ring to it, since ecosystems are comprised of parts and entities involved that don't control an ecosystem, otherwise it wouldn't really be an ecosystem, if one could own and control all of it's aspects. It would simply be their property. Unless you want to posit all the vendors on an ecosystem belong to Apple as well, if they one day declared on-paper "if you sell in our ecosystem, we own you and your products".
The security arguments are the most hilariously pathetic meme argument in their arsenal. The fact one posits it's even "arguable" is silly enough (and goes without saying the ones that buy into the argument entirely, are a lost case if they still hold to such an idea in the year 2021 and the average technical literacy of this time period).
While sure you may not "like" that everything thinks they now have special rights, those people are making the claim that Apple behaves in a way where they assume THEY have special rights. Case and point being, all those things I mentioned prior (quelling repair industry, saying their hardware is part of the ecosystem, thus making it a proprietary product in it's entirety, dictating what people are allowed to do with devices they've purchased, decision making that forces everyone under their App Store to behave a certain way, etc..). Funnily enough, you believe in freedoms, but Apple behaves like a dictator. The meme argument of "if you don't like it, then leave" is about as silly as telling someone "if you don't like America, leave". So due to a preference, someone should upend their entire flow of life, when instead all consumers would benefit by having a single entity change their mode of operation.
So yeah, people thinking "they have special rights" makes complete sense when the ire of the many is at stake compared to the ire of a single company. No one is proposing changes that would kill them. With the reach they have in society, no one cares about supposed infringement on their "property". Corporations are idiotically treated like living beings in this country. If that isn't "special rights" that need to be abolished as much as possible, idk what is.
It is, isn't it.. In the same way Apple couldn't exist in totality, if we didn't have roads, or a relatively healthy society to sell their products to.
Sure, but most people aren't against this practice. They're against the choice deprivation (like a small example being now on my phone, I can't enable or disable HDR mode when taking pictures that I had in my prior phone). Are you going to buy Apple's argument it's their ecosystem, and due to security their decision to remove such an option is justified? Do you think I'm positing "special rights" for saying I should be given what I've already been provided before? Does my Apple Music have to be also hampered so hard on Windows machines? Etc..
You don't actually have to answer any of this, it's just food for thought. Though what I would hope to get an answer to, is the question I concluded my prior post with.
You should really quit while your are behind. Not to mention this is way off topic not that I’m helping that.