- Thread Starter
- #21
Peter is one of the pioneers in the field of room correction. He has literally decades of experience to bring to the table.
When Topping went for something just a tad more complex than a DAC (EX series) they gave us a 100dB SINAD.Why even at this high price point AV processors cannot get linearity, output level and SINAD in the SOTA range?!? Does it depend on having in the same box the video and the audio signal? Or is it just too much to ask to see one day a Topping level audio performance? Before investing this kind of money I wonder if the video signal processing suffers from the same glitches as the audio. Great review Amir!
Software can't increase distortion that way.Also as pointed out it can be software, who knows.
Peter stated previously that he initially was doing what Dirac is doing now: trying to achieve a "perfect" FR. But, after a while he noticed that it made all speakers sound alike. So, he changed his approach, and thus the algorithm, to adjust the FR to correct for the room and anomalies in the speaker's output. That way RoomPerfect preserves the characteristic sound of each speaker.Peter is one of the pioneers in the field of room correction. He has literally decades of experience to bring to the table.
I agree: this is the all-too-common filter where full attenuation is at 24 kHz, not 22!This is only 15dB attenuation before Nyquist?
This is good?
I’m sure if that was audible they would do it. They spent the money on quality eq something that anyone can setup and hear. Agree it’s pricey but they are classed as premium products.Well, with distortion being essentially the same with HDMI, S/PDIF and USB input, this serves to show that it is possible to get decent audio out of HDMI.
Decent is the most one can call 106 dB SINAD. At this price point, I'd still expect them to strive for 115 dB in design which is lots of much much cheaper DACs achieve these days, and most importantly to test every single unit.
It would be interesting to compare this to the McIntosh MX180, which is basically the same hardware.
Is there a reason why we haven't we seen a single McIntosh (home) component tested? Has no one ever offered to send you one? Or is there some conflict of interest?
That's an absolute NoGo! We need stable performance of all channels, this could indicate a technical problem or just sloppy design. (e.g. some multichannel amps/controllers have more hum on some channels - sloppy grounding and wiring)Sadly distortion is higher in Channel 1 (Left) bringing their average a couple of notches lower:
No.This is only 15dB attenuation before Nyquist?
This is good?
More than unknown, used in a very small and expensive set of electronics.Peter stated previously that he initially was doing what Dirac is doing now: trying to achieve a "perfect" FR. But, after a while he noticed that it made all speakers sound alike. So, he changed his approach, and thus the algorithm, to adjust the FR to correct for the room and anomalies in the speaker's output. That way RoomPerfect preserves the characteristic sound of each speaker.
I guess RoomPerfect is a bit underrated. Must be that unknown is unloved.
You're more than welcome to purchase an overpriced piece of McIntosh gear and submit it for testing. I think that most people here realize that Mac is overpriced and then don't buy their gear.It would be interesting to compare this to the McIntosh MX180, which is basically the same hardware.
Is there a reason why we haven't we seen a single McIntosh (home) component tested? Has no one ever offered to send you one? Or is there some conflict of interest?