Why do you need a DAC, they have analogue outputs already?But you can't use your DAC via USB, only toslink..
Why do you need a DAC, they have analogue outputs already?But you can't use your DAC via USB, only toslink..
Not there yet, but the FusionControl header gives hope?But where is the DSP in this unit?
Not all. Two of the miniDSP's under discussion are digital out only.Why do you need a DAC, they have analogue outputs already?
The models mentioned above are SHD and Flex; both have analogue outputs.Not all. Two of the miniDSP's under discussion are digital out only.
If it adds a level of distortion down around -140 db and it does not alter the frequency response at all, and it does not add any noise that could possibly be audible, then I fail to see how it could change the sound fed into it. Amir didn't say about the gain level, but apparently it has up to 13 db gain. So gain might raise noise of the input that much, but if you aren't using gain from the RME that is not a problem and even raising the RME noise 13 db it will still be quite low.Amir, i don't understand your listening test and conclusion for this preamp
You test the output section for headphone, fine
But why don't you test and tell us how this preamp performs in between your RME and an amp? I mean sonically
lets think the chain:
- RME to amp to speakers
- RME to Hypex preamp to amp to speakers
What is then the benefit of the preamp sonically?
Does this preamp brings more gain, better soundstage, a different listening experience?
Thanks
There is no benefits or drawbacks sonically since it's proven audibly transparentAmir, i don't understand your listening test and conclusion for this preamp
You test the output section for headphone, fine
But why don't you test and tell us how this preamp performs in between your RME and an amp? I mean sonically
lets think the chain:
- RME to amp to speakers
- RME to Hypex preamp to amp to speakers
What is then the benefit of the preamp sonically?
Does this preamp brings more gain, better soundstage, a different listening experience?
Thanks
that red line (threshold) on the graphs should be less in-yo-face; may be a faint (gray-ish) dashed-line. imoaudibly transparent
Negative, two of the miniDSP SHD and Flex models that can handle a 2.x system are indeed digital out only (no analogue out whatsoever). SHD Studio and Flex Digital.The models mentioned above are SHD and Flex; both have analogue outputs.
Standard SHD has an analogue output version, almost a third of the price, and has a DSP.Negative, two of the miniDSP SHD and Flex models that can handle a 2.x system are indeed digital out only (no analogue out whatsoever). SHD Studio and Flex Digital.
Let's not have another discussion where it is said I need new glasses lol.
What’s the “fusion” thing supposed to do ?This pre amp will also suitable as a head unit for the Fusion plate amps, had something to do with the preconception of this nice little piece of gear. This idea was mine (Fusion). Those insert connectors are for the EQ board.
The Freya S is Indeed the right preamp to get, not sure why the "even" tough. That's to be expected, Hypex never had been affordable, It's only the number of builders around that compete so hard at each other that they sell direct at almost no margin that make it look that way. Even the Topping Pre90 when you need the extra inputs is considerably more expensive than the Freya S.The more I read the more I get confused because I see no practical use for this pre amp. Even the Schitt Freya S is a much better choice than this and it cost half.
Maybe Amir could do a parody of those Youtube hallucinator-"Reviewers" and say its a giant killer, but doesn't quite have the soundstage depth of a 10x the price preamp.Amir, i don't understand your listening test and conclusion for this preamp
What is then the benefit of the preamp sonically?
Does this preamp brings more gain, better soundstage, a different listening experience?
Me too, but I count 3 stereo inputs. yes it's not many, I think this may start to make more sense when the add on modules get released but Indeed as it it's a lukewarm offer.The reason why I need a preamp is that in my main system I have 5 different sound sources with analog outputs. But - the preamp with 1 input? To me, there is no use.
Thank you, @Rick Sykora,...If I have to build it, expect I get some credit for my assembly effort!...
It's a valid question, they do not state that directly and DIYClassD is the brand. It could also be just that, but let's assume it is since it has a switching power supply, among other cues. Now we may still ask. Why? I got nothing against class D, I have Hypex amps myself, but without need for current delivery and by extension power, doesn't it just become a "because I can" type of audio development? Does it really add something to the table? Sure it measures very good, but others do too, and it's not because it comes cheaper, it does not. So yes, why?Out of curiosity. Is Hypex DIY balanced Pre amplifiera a class D based pre amp? I thought most pre amps were class A based?
If it is class D topology, why that for a pre amp?
Edit:
But okay, it says DIY/CLASS D on it, so then it's probably a class D based pre amp.
Talking about my configuration, source PC to RME ADI 2 DAC FS to NC400 monoblocks, to add an active sub im forced to use high level input or split XLR out of the RME, because it's RCA output is lower and to match you should turn way up the sub amp.. tried with a passive sub driven by a Crown XLS 1502.Well the device in question is analog out only, with your wish that one output be for mains monoblocks, and output two be for active sub. So no way (or need) to use an external DAC there either.