Longest wait ever for some lousy numbers.
Edit: I even refresh the page behind the red light!!
Yea man. Where’s the review
Longest wait ever for some lousy numbers.
Edit: I even refresh the page behind the red light!!
Award for most entitled sounding post goes to!!How could be so difficult to publish a review already written, at least the most part of it?
It’s lunchtime on a Friday in Amir’s time zone. I just squeezed a report through a deadline today with 5 minutes to go cob and that’s my real jobYea man. Where’s the review
I would think he is being upfront with RF AIR given he lent him his brand new unopened factory fresh 4800 for the purpose of the review. Sounds like it’s a pretty sure thing at some point today.
Bedroom setup is done. Audyssey in the X4800H is also done. All good so far. Now back to the living room to run Audyssey in the X4700H.
View attachment 270746
View attachment 270748
OK, his and her’s screens maybe. But how do you separate the sound
Did you’ve 4700 AKM?BTW, for those hopping for better SINAD on the X4800H, don't get your hopes too high. I'm getting less noise floor on my miniDSP connected to the X4700H than on the one connected to the X4800H.
Did you’ve 4700 AKM?
I only use Mogami on XLR balanced connectionsNo, I have a X4700H with PCM DACs and a X4800H just purchased today. BTW, I changed the input cable in my miniDSP 2x4 HD from Emotiva RCA cable to Mogami Gold RCA cable and input noise floor went from -84dBFS to -98dBFS
That is very strange, the Emotica cable has a good reputation, and the shielding is not all that different between them.... what is going on to result in a 14dbfs difference...??No, I have a X4700H with PCM DACs and a X4800H just purchased today. BTW, I changed the input cable in my miniDSP 2x4 HD from Emotiva RCA cable to Mogami Gold RCA cable and input noise floor went from -84dBFS to -98dBFS
I think I’ve been beaten up by the review thread. I tried to put Amir’s review within the context of who actually own an X4800H.
The fact being that the poll stands front and foremost on the review page. Long after the review and most of the initial respondents have had their say.
The X3800H and RZ50 look awful because ASR members have voted just on the basis of Amir’s measurements. When in fact they are good products for most people.
In essence, I think Amir should not put a polling option alongside his reviews. Because it’s just a blind affirmation of his review/test results. Means nothing. His test results should stand. He doesn’t need a poll to confirm them.
The X4800 amp goes from 134W@8ohm to only around 170W@4ohm... roughly a 30% rise... where theoretically, in the absence of other constraints it should double!yea the polls seem to be almost always decided by sinad numbers and whether Amir recommends or not. That said, having had both RZ50 and 4800h, rz50 amp is terrible in comparison
The X4800 amp goes from 134W@8ohm to only around 170W@4ohm... roughly a 30% rise... where theoretically, in the absence of other constraints it should double!
Neither the RZ50 nor the X4800 are impressive in terms of amps... both are good for basic 8ohm speakers with uncomplicated crossovers and no dramatic drops in impedance as a result... the X4800 has a bit more power than the RZ50, but not enough the substantively make a difference - if you have difficult speakers, either of these AVR's will probably work better with external amps added (for LCR).