• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

$20k for dream 2.0 or 2.1 rig

Most dealers do not do this. Never has one level matched for my listening.
I agree they don’t but they should, in practise even if you start level matched within minutes someone turns something up or down , level really makes a profound difference.
Keith
 
Where I work, we do level matching for speaker comparisons for customers. We also will change the speaker positions and recalibrate as speaker position can affect sound. You can never control every variable. You can debate which type of pink noise you should use, full range or band limited (typically from 500-2khz which is common for setting speaker levels in processors). Full range can definitely skew results if there are differences in speaker capability, like one which goes lower in bass for example. If you are going to be using a sub you can limit your comparisons and cut out the bass frequencies.

I do think most dealers don't level match, but they should. They should have those volume numbers preset if they have a showroom. Some I think is just ignorance and most customers are not as well informed as members here. Many times when customers do comparisons they just grab the remote and vary the volume themselves. Where I work we don't have a showroom and we let customers take the speakers home an offer to set them up for comparison. That is often denied and I know a lot of customers aren't level matching at home.

Members here should realize they are much more informed then most dealers. I would predict that the majority of customers that dealers see have nowhere near the level of knowledge as members here. So they are not used to dealing with this type of customer. If you're going to do comparisons at a dealer bring test tones and an SPL meter (phone ones are fine). I hope most dealers at least let you set levels yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKR
Short list so far:

  • Siberg Manta
  • KH420
  • Dutch & Dutch 8C Studio
  • PMC 8-2
  • Genelec 8361
  • ELX Tower
  • KEF LS60

A member messaged me about Soundfield and I cannot find information on them other than some very. Does anyone have experience with this brand? Many of the models on the website say available in 2019.
 
Short list so far:

  • Siberg Manta
  • KH420
  • Dutch & Dutch 8C Studio
  • PMC 8-2
  • Genelec 8361
  • ELX Tower
  • KEF LS60

A member messaged me about Soundfield and I cannot find information on them other than some very. Does anyone have experience with this brand? Many of the models on the website say available in 2019.
Good. As you are looking into actives. I would choose some with built-in room correction eg Genelec or D&D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKR
Can of worms but here you go . @
Short list so far:

  • Siberg Manta
  • KH420
  • Dutch & Dutch 8C Studio
  • PMC 8-2
  • Genelec 8361
  • ELX Tower
  • KEF LS60

A member messaged me about Soundfield and I cannot find information on them other than some very. Does anyone have experience with this brand? Many of the models on the website say available in 2019.
Can of worms but here you go . @MKR
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKR
Can of worms but here you go . @

Can of worms but here you go . @MKR
What do you mean? @MKR asked me to contact the owner, but I am seeing neither data nor any real-world experience with Soundfirled. Maybe Audio Science Review is a MLM website because I have had several people message me trying to argue or sell me on a direction I should go. @Adi777 is supposed to have pair.
Good. As you are looking into actives. I would choose some with built-in room correction eg Genelec or D&D.
EQ seems to be paramount to in-room treatment which I always thought was at least part of the equation.
 
What do you mean? @MKR asked me to contact the owner, but I am seeing neither data nor any real-world experience with Soundfirled. Maybe Audio Science Review is a MLM website because I have had several people message me trying to argue or sell me on a direction I should go. @Adi777 is supposed to have pair.

EQ seems to be paramount to in-room treatment which I always thought was at least part of the equation.
@kma100 is correct, a can of worms, related to my $30k thread and AJs history here on ASR (shouldn’t be the case, but sadly so) … probably best to move on, I would hate for your thread to go same direction as mine did :(
 
According to @MKR there is no Klippel data available for Soundfield. Klippel is a requirement for any contender as it provides the best data and science to back up manufacturer claims. All serious speaker companies would be wise to have this tool on hand. Science is the future of audio.
 
According to @MKR there is no Klippel data available for Soundfield. Klippel is a requirement for any contender as it provides the best data and science to back up manufacturer claims. All serious speaker companies would be wise to have this tool on hand. Science is the future of audio.
Agreed. A pair of Soundfield monitors supposed to go to Erin at some point, but not sure of timing.
 
To be fair there aren’t too many Klippel NFS’s kicking around but yes the manufacturer can still produce CEA-2034 compliant measurements.
Keith
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKR
Short list so far:

  • Siberg Manta
  • KH420
  • Dutch & Dutch 8C Studio
  • PMC 8-2
  • Genelec 8361
  • ELX Tower
  • KEF LS60

A member messaged me about Soundfield and I cannot find information on them other than some very. Does anyone have experience with this brand? Many of the models on the website say available in 2019.
Okay, I can actually speak on some of these!

I have used the 8-2, 8C, 8361, and just bought KH420s.

None of these need subs to be full-range. They all, save for the 8361, have F3s free field well into the 20s of hz. The 8361 is in the low 30s somewhere.

The 8Cs are the most SPL limited of them (the cardioid loading makes the midrange work harder in the low mids to upper bass), but they still get plenty loud. Very punchy.

The 8-2s are going to be the most room sensitive, by a long shot; they do have pretty sizeable DSP EQ on board however. They're quite big, too. They get absolutely terrifyingly loud without strain. They do the usual PMC "way too bright" thing. Also consider the 6-2, it's much more manageable sizewise.

The 8361s have GLM, but to me are the least good of the bunch. They are harsh in the presence region to me. They're also absolutely massive in a way I can't really describe.

The KH420s have a rather tight bottom end considering the ported design and don't seem to have lost that punchiness that the smaller ones have - Neumann chose a very low port tuning so this helps. For an analog active, they have a lot of onboard controls.

Keep in mind all of these speakers weigh a lot and will need very beefy stands - I bought Sound Anchor ADJ2s as I'm in a studio environment; they aren't particularly pretty.
 
Last edited:
After some time in this hobby I would like to build out a nice stereo system. Surround is nice for movies but I don't notice a big difference.

Ideally this would just be a pair of speakers, being fed by my Benchmark DAC 3 HGC. Actives seem like the way to go for the sake of power and dollar efficiency. I would be open to passives but my total budget includes amplification. At what point does the size of the speaker matter? Can you get away with smaller and more streamlined components or do you need a massive box for full 20-20khz range? My listening space isn't enormous at maybe 3 x 4m. Thank you
Coming back to your original post … In my journey I started out with the mantra of go passive or go home. While I believe you can achieve outstanding results with a superb passive design (Salon 2!), in the end I ended up coming to the conclusion that active is the best way to achieve state of the art performance. I will say I do still have some passive designs on my short list, but in the end I expect the final choice will be active. We shall see.

I am also a big believer in large full range floorstanders with large drivers. From what I have heard past year or so in my quest, it is the only the large floorstanders that give me the dynamics and scale I am looking for. Definitely no monitors in my future. With this said, your listening space is quite small and something like the 8C would be more than capable to fill that space. However, with a cardioid design floorstander and a bit of room EQ, you could get the benefits of a large driver system even in a small space. To say, I do not subscribe to the fairly common thought that you can’t use large speakers in a smaller space, but careful setup is certainly more warranted in that case.

On the topic of full range mains … do you want to use subwoofers, or you rather avoid if possible?

And for what it’s worth, my latest short list below (yes, there are some passives and yes, some that are not supported with measurements, which I hope I will be able to obtain from manufacturer at some point … they are on the list first and foremost because I have spent extensive time listening to them and they offered outstanding SUBJECTIVE performance for my ears).

D&D (not the 8C, rather the upcoming larger design)
Clarysis (passive dipole planar)
Diptyque (passive dipole planar)
Legacy V System and Aeris (mixed passive/active)
Soundfield custom (active)
GT Audioworks (passive dipole planar, though the subwoofer towers are active, haven’t actually heard this one yet, look very intriguing)

I should note that Legacy now has a fully active tower speaker (Focus XD) that was positively reviewed on Soundstage, though this is primarily a subjective review, but there are at least some measurements (better than nothing, but far from what we like to see here in ASR). This tower is too small for me, but I wonder if Legacy will start designing more of their offerings as fully active (many already are mixed … low freq active, remainder passive). They also have a fully active monitor you may consider, the Calibre. But I have not heard it nor do I know if any measurements.

Legacy Focus review … https://hometheaterhifi.com/reviews...ocus-xd-floor-standing-speaker-review-part-i/

By the way, have you considered the JBL 4329p ? I have not heard it, but looks to be a very good design … https://www.erinsaudiocorner.com/loudspeakers/jbl_4329p/
 
Audio Science Review has shown me the value of transparency. Data doesn't lie and the newer measurement methodology cannot be skewed by the room. That said I did message Soundfield @MKR's encouragement. Their response is below. Admittedly I do not know all of what is being said, but it was better to have some data.

That's a rather odd request, since in room measurements are perceptually blind and relevant only to the room its measured in. Here is a large bookshelf monitor I'm making for another ASR member. What's perceptually relevant is smooth on/off axis >500hz. Below 500, the room dominates, but a nearfield measurement will show the "speaker" response, in this case extending down to 20Hz F10. My speakers also have indirect, delayed radiation drivers at the rear. While this a has quite an effect on the spatial rendering, it will not show up in an in room measurement.

The measurement looks decent. What is more surprising is the use of mega power cables and risers in the test space. I like the burl veneer a lot.
CX512x2CardBk0-60FR.png
CX512x2vsDpty.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKR
Audio Science Review has shown me the value of transparency. Data doesn't lie and the newer measurement methodology cannot be skewed by the room. That said I did message Soundfield @MKR's encouragement. Their response is below. Admittedly I do not know all of what is being said, but it was better to have some data.



The measurement looks decent. What is more surprising is the use of mega power cables and risers in the test space. I like the burl veneer a lot. View attachment 334958View attachment 334959
Good deal, glad you were able to get some measurements. And a correction… I just asked AJ about the “risers” and cables as again he doesn’t subscribe to such nonsense. That pic is at a friend of his place that does in fact subscribe to some of the silliness ;)
 
@mad if you don’t level match, at least pick up an SPL meter for your smartphone and when you compare two speakers, set it to your preferred volume and then make note of the volume you are listening at. That will help you keep track of whether the speaker or the volume is what you like.

All things equal, you probably want to pick the speaker that you enjoy the most at lower volumes to protect your hearing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKR
Coming back to your original post … In my journey I started out with the mantra of go passive or go home. While I believe you can achieve outstanding results with a superb passive design (Salon 2!), in the end I ended up coming to the conclusion that active is the best way to achieve state of the art performance. I will say I do still have some passive designs on my short list, but in the end I expect the final choice will be active. We shall see.

I am also a big believer in large full range floorstanders with large drivers. From what I have heard past year or so in my quest, it is the only the large floorstanders that give me the dynamics and scale I am looking for. Definitely no monitors in my future. With this said, your listening space is quite small and something like the 8C would be more than capable to fill that space. However, with a cardioid design floorstander and a bit of room EQ, you could get the benefits of a large driver system even in a small space. To say, I do not subscribe to the fairly common thought that you can’t use large speakers in a smaller space, but careful setup is certainly more warranted in that case.

On the topic of full range mains … do you want to use subwoofers, or you rather avoid if possible?

And for what it’s worth, my latest short list below (yes, there are some passives and yes, some that are not supported with measurements, which I hope I will be able to obtain from manufacturer at some point … they are on the list first and foremost because I have spent extensive time listening to them and they offered outstanding SUBJECTIVE performance for my ears).

D&D (not the 8C, rather the upcoming larger design)
Clarysis (passive dipole planar)
Diptyque (passive dipole planar)
Legacy V System and Aeris (mixed passive/active)
Soundfield custom (active)
GT Audioworks (passive dipole planar, though the subwoofer towers are active, haven’t actually heard this one yet, look very intriguing)

I should note that Legacy now has a fully active tower speaker (Focus XD) that was positively reviewed on Soundstage, though this is primarily a subjective review, but there are at least some measurements (better than nothing, but far from what we like to see here in ASR). This tower is too small for me, but I wonder if Legacy will start designing more of their offerings as fully active (many already are mixed … low freq active, remainder passive). They also have a fully active monitor you may consider, the Calibre. But I have not heard it nor do I know if any measurements.

Legacy Focus review … https://hometheaterhifi.com/reviews...ocus-xd-floor-standing-speaker-review-part-i/

By the way, have you considered the JBL 4329p ? I have not heard it, but looks to be a very good design … https://www.erinsaudiocorner.com/loudspeakers/jbl_4329p/
I have always liked JBL but not their looks. Legacy looks nice but might be a touch on the bigger side of things. Passives are off my list.

Grimm is added to the short list. Subwoofers are okay if they can be integrated into the whole set up physically like the Kii or Hedd.
 
@mad if you don’t level match, at least pick up an SPL meter for your smartphone and when you compare two speakers, set it to your preferred volume and then make note of the volume you are listening at. That will help you keep track of whether the speaker or the volume is what you like.

All things equal, you probably want to pick the speaker that you enjoy the most at lower volumes to protect your hearing.
Any levels above 75 is too much for extended listening.
 
You could just build a pair of M2s as @MAB did :D

 
Back
Top Bottom