Yep.
It sounds like a tautology, but… If there is anything that someone who worked in their previous career of vibration control should know, I would assume it would be vibration control.
Yes, you would think so, but it clearly didn't work out the way he wanted did it? Let's stop calling it some magical vibration reduction system based on science. It's a poorly considered cheap option that fell out and/or was loose when the reviewer tested these speakers. I have absolutely no doubt the reviewer is telling the truth and the other party is desperately trying to save face by (poorly) attempting (standard MO) to discredit someone else to make himself look better. So sad and newsflash! It's a puerile method that always backfires. And backfire it has.
The speaker frame rim is coupled to the baffle in any case and obviously the rubber well-nuts are a poor choice. In 4 decades of working on speakers and audio, I have never seen such unsuitable fixings applied to secure woofers to a baffle. Not once. They do not stand the test of time in any situation and proper speaker manufacturers know this. Mostly you will see them in auto installations where they regularly fall out of blind holes due to the rubber going hard, shrinking etc. We've all been there. Once permanently disfigured they sag. In this vertcial placement they are just totally unsuitable for the long term.
Speakers where esoteric or unsuitable methods of decoupling were applied to mitigate baffle vibration/resonance have invariably had short operational lives. Plenty of manufacturers have tried unsuccssfully to present woofer/baffle decoupling designs (this is nothing new) and they all reverted to tried and true fixing methods. Jamo threw a ton of research money at baffle/woofer decoupling in the 1980s and released a range called CBR with neoprene vibration control blocks. They abandoned the entire idea after the woofer decoupling joints sagged and failed in a few short years. I used to see CBRs with the woofers falling out! Around the same time the foam surrounds rotted out, so most went to landfill. At least they stayed firmly attached long enough to get a proper review, unlike this particular pair of Sointuvas.
Jamo's CBR details for those of you too young in 1985:
And at that time, Jamo was producing over 600,000 loudspeakers
per year ,from a 16,500sqM factory with a daily output capacity of 2,000 finished systems.