very nice Info here , thanks all
Quick question is do you agree the
Arvus – H2-4D is better than Meridian 271 ? Or what is your opinion?
Is one thing that transports bit perfect audio better than another thing that transports bit perfect audio?
You'd have to be more specific.
The Arvus supports Dante, Which is the most flexible and future-proof connectivity option in the history of the universe, so that might be something to consider, that being said, nobody really uses it, And companies like JBL have portable implementations of it that could be considered broken if you are using that equipment with the Arvus.
Interface wise, The Meridian may have more consumer-friendly options since the Arvus is a professional tool.
If I recall correctly, the meridian 271 is pretty old though right? So it wouldn't support Dolby Atmos, so if by better you mean supporting modern standards, Then the one supporting modern standards is better.
However, unless you can hear a defect with the Meridian 271, chances are You're not going to notice a sound quality difference moving from one digital thing to another, especially for stereo.