AVB is theoretically technically superior to AES67/Dante/Ravenna however in practice most of the implementations are not interoperable and a tiny number of switch vendors support it and those that do generally charge extra to enable it.There are 2 ways to make Dante/AES67 equipment coexists with AVB. Bi Amp makes an AVB/Dante switch (TC-5D) that acts as a Dante endpoint. So, one can connect an Arvus to TC-5D. TC-5D then converts Dante to AVB. AVB protocol uses Level 2 switching, so it is a superior solution to Level 3 switching. One may argue that it is BetaMax and Dante is VHS. Maybe. But, unlike VHS, one can use both in the same network, by having a right switch. Use a RME Digiface AVB interface to connect all the AVB equipment by RME and other manufactures.
The second way needs testing. But it should work. Use software Dante Via and Dante Controller on a PC. It can find and connect all Dante equipped devices on the network. So, the 16 channels of Avrus can be selected by the DSP software as inputs. Then, the same software can select RME TotalMix Fx as outputs.
No comment on lip sync correction, as testing is required. But, there is also delay on the video side, as Madvr tone mapping adds latency as well. So, correction is required, even without a pc doing dsp and crossover. RME's TotalMix Fx is very powerful. It can even be remotely controlled on an Ipad. My very strong guess is that it will work.
In practice you see AVB being used point to point or in an isolated network with a single small switch. Large AOIP deployments and basically all Pro Audio live sound uses Dante because Audinate made it just work and all Dante equipment interoperates with all other Dante equipment.
That Dante to AVB converter is ~£1600 on to the cost you have to really want to use RME rather than the alternatives that speak AES67 to stomach that cost.