• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

NAD C 3050 Integrated Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 17 6.4%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 134 50.2%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 110 41.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 6 2.2%

  • Total voters
    267
Is there a receiver with DIRAC available for less than $1300? Availability of DIRAC in anything under $1K is rare. NC252MP modules or something in this NAD would have been nice of course, but Amir's rec considering the whole package is fair.
 
Is there a receiver with DIRAC available for less than $1300? Availability of DIRAC in anything under $1K is rare. NC252MP modules or something in this NAD would have been nice of course, but Amir's rec considering the whole package is fair.

The Denon X3800H was just a few days back on sale for less than $1K. It comes with Audyssey but you can purchase the Dirac Live license for Denon for $250.
 
Is there a receiver with DIRAC available for less than $1300? Availability of DIRAC in anything under $1K is rare. NC252MP modules or something in this NAD would have been nice of course, but Amir's rec considering the whole package is fair.
$799 Onkyo TX-RZ30
 
+ $300 for the DIRAC license. Great price, but I'd gladly pay the extra for the NAD looks if I were in the market.
No comes with Dirac
 
You can purchase any AVR and achieve the same terrible performance for a fraction of the price...
AVR will take up ton more space, doesn't have direct input buttons, and runs much hotter. They are also uglier to boot. I hate using AVRs for anything other than home theater.
 
AVR will take up ton more space, doesn't have direct input buttons, and runs much hotter. They are also uglier to boot. I hate using AVRs for anything other than home theater.
I suppose that is fair, but this is also quite a bit more expensive. So you could buy a larger cabinet with the difference in price :)
 
AVR will take up ton more space, doesn't have direct input buttons, and runs much hotter. They are also uglier to boot. I hate using AVRs for anything other than home theater.
Of course AVRs should be used for HT but Dirac or similar alternatives are worth a lot for realistic sound and AVRs have that. Personally for audio something like this hits a sweet spot for accuracy, size and power with good measurements. There are others good ones as well.
 
Of course AVRs should be used for HT but Dirac or similar alternatives are worth a lot for realistic sound and AVRs have that.
I do EQ in the source so don't need AVR for stereo. Multichannel becomes a pain as the permutations sharply increase but for stereo, it is manageable.

I wish the market produces nice, slim multi-channel products. Right now the few that exist don't have good performance.
 
I do EQ in the source so don't need AVR for stereo. Multichannel becomes a pain as the permutations sharply increase but for stereo, it is manageable.

I wish the market produces nice, slim multi-channel products. Right now the few that exist don't have good performance.
So true and that is why companies like WiiM are doing so well.
 
Optional MDC2 BluOS-D module adds BluOS high-resolution multi-room music streaming and Dirac Live* room correction

*500Hz limited version of Dirac Live included. Full bandwidth license can be purchased from Dirac.com


JSmith
 
Isn't this weird? Aren't you able to choose sampling frequency and bit depth?
I am not sure. The only UI is over the web and I didn't see it in my quick look. Very few companies allow this selection.
 
This is a review and detailed measurements of the NAD C 3050 integrated amplifier with included DAC and optional streaming module. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $1,599.
Thanks for the review Amir. Love seeing products from mainstream manufacturers like NAD featured here. I bought the NAD 3050LE (with the real wood) when it came out. I love the way it looks and it sounds fine to my ears (and now verified with your objective measurements).

At the time, I wrote a review of the amplifier based on real-life usage, which can be found at https://fcracer.com/nad-c3050-le-review/

I too feel the volume knob is subpar and should have been made of metal to go along with the vintage vibes. I also found the VU meter on my unit to be incorrectly calibrated. I provided NAD with information from my testing, but they haven’t made any improvements in the firmware over the past two years, so I’m not hopeful it will ever get fixed.

Results of my testing on the VU meters with my retail purchased 3050 LE:

Input SignalVU Meter Actual Reading
0 db+3 db
-3 db+1.5 db
-6 db0 db
-9 db-1.5 db

Regarding the lights, I also felt the same. I would suggest setting the LED brightness to “Off” so that you’re not blinded by the rather intense Volume setting LEDs. I should note another potential bug here. For the LED setting, I found some behaviour that didn’t seem intentional when adjusted via the BluOS app:

Normal: All LED are bright = Correct function
Dim: Only the power LED dims, all other LED remains bright = Incorrect function
Off: All LED are off = Correct function

Another strange bug is the balance control. When moved to either side, there’s still significant volume that comes from the lowered speaker. The balance control is more like an adjustment to centre the speakers than a real traditional balance control.

Overall, I’ve been very happy with the 3050 LE over the two years I’ve owned it. Since it’s a bedroom setup, I don’t get close to maxing out the 100w/ch and the Dirac Live room correction works extremely well to sort out the room modes. I would buy the LE version again.

Since I bought it primarily for how it looks in my bedroom, I’ll share some images I took of the setup. I think it looks rather cool with the Wharfedale Denton speakers and IKEA MALM dresser.

1744167760682.jpeg


1744167799354.jpeg


1744167692252.jpeg
 
Agreed. I would have considered an NAD C 3050 if the retro aesthetic was accomplished with a veneer of wood instead of plastic.
The original LE version comes with real wood. However, when launched, they were sold out worldwide. I preordered mine the day of announcement. I’m not sure how durable the wood will be, but in my super dry air city, it’s held up well over the two years I’ve had it.
 
I also did some analog input and metering examination on my 3050LE on ASR here. Earlier firmware so the gain structure has changed since then, with a ~12dB increase in output for a given volume level.
 
Lab tests by Soundstage and Stereophile, suggested to the authors that line input sample rate was the much more common 48KHz. Maybe the C3050LE differs or something changed with FW updates?
The frequency it's not selectable by settings menus.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250409_083456_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20250409_083456_Chrome.jpg
    350.7 KB · Views: 22
  • Screenshot_20250409_083244_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20250409_083244_Chrome.jpg
    142 KB · Views: 21
Lab tests by Sounds rage and Stereophile, suggested to the authors that line input sample rate was the much more common 48KHz. Maybe the C3050LE differs or something changed with FW updates?
I saw that too. Freq response plots though looked like 44.1, but said aliasing products suggested 48. The adc filter could be for 44, but sample rate 48 perhaps??
 
Back
Top Bottom