• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

NAD C 316BEE V2 Integrated Amplifier Review

Rate this stereo amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 41 15.3%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 181 67.5%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 42 15.7%

  • Total voters
    268
Not nearly as powerful as the Nad. The AXA35 is a nice sounding amp regardless. The Rotel A8 is also in the same ball park as the Nad but again only 30wpc so it will be like the AXA35 where a quiet room is needed unlike the Nad which they are noted for historically speaking and long may they continue as far as I am concerned.
Tiny heatsinks on the A8. That translates to low bias current in the output transistors or high temperatures, not a good sign.
 
@amirm , will this review be published in the index? It’s nice for glancing at multiple reviews side by side.
 
I had a NAD 316Bee v2 a few years ago. Replaced with a vintage Yamaha CA-1010 integrated (90w/ch). Had both units side by side for ~2 weeks comparing both. Yamaha just added more enjoyment to music with turntable and streaming. Power difference very apparent. Plus, VU meters make everything sound better.
 
Back
Top Bottom