Penelinfi
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2021
- Messages
- 920
- Likes
- 740
Silver 50 g7 ErinWould be quite curious to see some Klippel measurements of ANY of this brand.
Silver 50 g7 ErinWould be quite curious to see some Klippel measurements of ANY of this brand.
That is the url they have for the general page, but they use to have a page per speaker 100/200/300 etc
Would be quite curious to see some Klippel measurements of ANY of this brand.
www.audiosciencereview.com
Are there any measurements you can share about this particular aspect?They've been using AMT style tweeters for a little while now. Apparently difficult to keep the distortion down on the ribbons. Some might say, good decision; Bravo ...
Are there any measurements you can share about this particular aspect?
Amazing. Thank you.Monitor Gold 100 (5G) - AMT tweeter
![]()
Monitor Platinum PL100 - Ribbon tweeter
![]()
Soundstage network . com , same as in the first post. Admittedly the pl100 is a decade older but still shows what was going on. Btw the ribbon, it got worse at 96dBAmazing. Thank you.
What’s the source?
Thank you very much for sharing!! Earlier in this thread I mentioned that I compared the Silver 100 (7G) with the B&W 606 (S3) and preferred the Silvers because they were less fatiguing and had a great bass response. Unfortunately my girlfriend did not like the large size of the Silvers, so I ended up buying a second hand pair of MA Gold (5G). I like them, although they can be a little bright at times!? Since I never did a proper AB test, which was not the smartest choice I knowSoundstage network
Monitor Gold 100 (5G) - AMT tweeter
![]()
Monitor Platinum PL100 - Ribbon tweeter
![]()
I would not be surprised if the Bronze and Silver range measure better than the current Gold and higher with AMT tweeters.I have the current Bronze 3007g floorstanders and they’re sounding very good on the end of my modest Cambridge Audio CXA61.
Maybe the Golds are a bit more analytical and that can be perceived as brightness with some tracks(?)I like them, although they can be a little bright at times!?
Thanks! I Did some changes, I have a large deep pile rug/carpet in front of the speakers. Also, I have a bit less toe-in, only 10 degrees in a perfect 3 meter triangle (FR-FL-MLP all 3 meters). The the speakers are aimed towards the back of my listening position.Maybe the Golds are a bit more analytical and that can be perceived as brightness with some tracks(?)
Have you tried taming the highs? Try a rug, treat first-reflection points, try different toe-in.
And of course, you can always use some EQ.
If the bass is good, the highs are usually fixable.

Thanks! I Did some changes, I have a large deep pile rug/carpet in front of the speakers. Also, I have a bit less toe-in, only 10 degrees in a perfect 3 meter triangle (FR-FL-MLP all 3 meters). The the speakers are aimed towards the back of my listening position.
Lastly I did some EQ:
View attachment 495552
Using the multi EQ app I changer the curve. At 3kh until 20kh it went slowly down to 3db.
(in green you can see the original line).
Any suggestions to make these Golds less fatiguing / hot?
Straight or Toe-out solves it I guess. But does not sound nice with voices (weird large soundstage).Toe them out 10 degrees?