• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Monitor Audio Gold 100 (2019 revision) measurements by SoundStage/NRC

Or any Monitor Audio for what matters. For exemple, new Silver range looks very promising. Subjectively, I always liked their products and was a big fan of previous Silver and Gold series.
Fresh on-axis and decay measurement of the new Silver range top model, nicely flat and no pronounced resonances and with the small mid driver its horizontal directivity shouldn't be bad either:

1121monitor.lab1.jpg


1121monitor.lab2.jpg


Source: https://www.hifinews.com/content/monitor-audio-silver-500-7g-loudspeaker-lab-report
 
Yeah, even the Bronze wasn’t as bad:
https://www.soundstagenetwork.com/i...dio-bronze-6-loudspeakers&catid=77&Itemid=153

And it has 87dB sensitivity.

The older (before 2014) GX100 was better:
https://www.soundstagenetwork.com/i...&catid=77:loudspeaker-measurements&Itemid=153
And ~87dB.

So the current model has worse FR/directivity (distortion is better) and more difficult to power. I wonder how the 2014 Gold 100 measured.
Hello, I'm sorry to be repetitive but I don't understand what sensitivity these boxes have ... in its manual it says 88db 1w / 1m but they were measured at 86.5db at 2.83v / 1m does it mean that the manual measurement is correct or is it 3db less sensitive?

Is that I am
shuffling if it is worth putting external stage since I use quite a lot of spl and I was shuffling or stage or changing boxes.

But I love how these speakers sound, but I am calculating the power I need to get
100db.

Someone clarify for me?
 
Hello, I'm sorry to be repetitive but I don't understand what sensitivity these boxes have ... in its manual it says 88db 1w / 1m but they were measured at 86.5db at 2.83v / 1m does it mean that the manual measurement is correct or is it 3db less sensitive?

Is that I am
shuffling if it is worth putting external stage since I use quite a lot of spl and I was shuffling or stage or changing boxes.

But I love how these speakers sound, but I am calculating the power I need to get
100db.

Someone clarify for me?
I haven’t updated the calculations in a while, but last time I did, going my the IEC sensitivity spec that I go by (300Hz-3kHz) your average speaker is 1.5dB less sensitive than what is claimed in the manufacturer specifications.

Now, SoundStage/NRC calculates the sensitivity on the listening window and not the on-axis, but they should be similar.
 
I haven’t updated the calculations in a while, but last time I did, going my the IEC sensitivity spec that I go by (300Hz-3kHz) your average speaker is 1.5dB less sensitive than what is claimed in the manufacturer specifications.

Now, SoundStage/NRC calculates the sensitivity on the listening window and not the on-axis, but they should be similar.
Hello thanks for answering so if it is 1.5db less than the manufacturer would it be 86.5db at 1w / 1m?
 
Esa sería la diferencia promedio para cualquier altavoz, puede ver que los modelos de Monitor Audio que vinculé eran 87.3dB y 86.7dB, así que compárelo con sus especificaciones.
thanks
 
Looks like they've gone for an extended bass alignment? If you bring down that ~100Hz stereophile bump.
 
Monitor AUdio Gold 300 6G
Measurements - Stereophile 11.2024
I wonder if the Gold 200 5G (which I have and is the equivalent of this new model) measures in a similar way. I wouldn’t be surprised considering how it sounds in my room. It’s quite different from the Gold 300 5G, which was also measured by Stereophile and I think has a more pleasant and forgiving frequency response.
 
https://www.soundstagenetwork.com/i...dio-gold-100-loudspeakers&catid=77&Itemid=153
M.A.’s speaker measurements are all over the board, some are good and some are not, I don’t even know how they vary so much unless there are different designers.

For the far off-axis (45-75°), you can easily see the issue with crossing a 6.5” at 2.5kHz:
fr_456075.png

You also see that their AMT has pretty narrow dispersion.

At first I thought they maybe crossed that high due to distortion of the AMT (the RAAL ribbons don’t due too well at 2kHz for instance), but nope:
thd_90db.png

Besides the tiny blip at ~3400Hz the tweeter’s distortion doesn’t even show up in the 50dB window.

You can also see some weird happenings (related to the port?) at 500Hz, and looking at the response we do see that from the high frequencies going down, the SPL lowers at 500Hz and then gradually rises till 100Hz (the NRC chamber is only valid to around here).

<84dB sensitivity and 4ohm nominal also isn’t great.

This thing is $2300/pair by the way, at least it looks nice:
monitor-audio-gold-100-bookshelf-speakers-01-1200x1200.jpg


Here is the 2014-2018 version:
MAGX100_1_Zoom.jpg



These measurements are from last year, but I just found them, as another user asked me if I ever contacted Monitor Audio for comments on how they rate sensitivity (you can click my signature and go Manufacturer Comments in the Speaker Sensitivity tab for comments from other companies), but like B&W, you literally cannot contact the company, they simply refer you to your local dealers; so I went looking at measurements from other sites just to see, and the NRC got 83.32dB 300-3000Hz on the listening window, and this speaker is rated at 86dB @ 1W (I think they meant 2.83V, as this is for 4ohm, so 1W would be -3dB; so they are claiming 89dB @ 2.83V, which is +6dB from what the NRC got, but granted they use the listening window so it’s a bit lower than on-axis).
Reading this old post does not make me very excited. I’ve auditioned the MA Silver 100 7g next to the 606s3 in my place:

IMG_1503.jpeg

(Don’t worry I swapped them around while testing).

I preferred the Silvers over the 606 S3 since the treble was less fatiguing. However, my girlfriend wasn’t a fan of their large profile on the small stand, so I ended up choosing the Gold 100 5G after reading reviews and doing a quick audition (without direct comparison).

IMG_2246.jpeg
IMG_2247.jpeg


That said, seeing this post—and the one below about the cheaper MA speakers like the Bronze and Silver measuring better—is a bit disappointing. I like how the Golds sound, but I’m not sure if they’re actually better than the Silvers (and at this point, there’s no way to find out). I still need to experiment more with my ARC Genesis room correction.

at this point I’m curious if people here prefer the silvers 7g / bronze over the Gold 5g?!
 
I personally prefer Silver over Gold series with most last gens, especially the Silver 7G VS Gold 5G.
I was already afraid for this.. stupid of me to assume the Golds would at least be as good without auditioning them.

Well the only MA choice I had was the Silver 50 7g because of its size.. It was hard to imagine I would prefer the 50s over the Gold 100 5g…
 
I was already afraid for this.. stupid of me to assume the Golds would at least be as good without auditioning them.

Well the only MA choice I had was the Silver 50 7g because of its size.. It was hard to imagine I would prefer the 50s over the Gold 100 5g…
Other people may like something, but doesn't always mean you'll like the same.

I haven't heard the silver series or gold 100 though .

It would seem maybe the gold is voiced a little more delicate and slightly less forward in the upper mids?

If you like them, there's not much need to worry unless you're on a free returns and wondering about the other options. They do make a quite compact and nice looking speaker, which isn't always available in other speakers
 
Other people may like something, but doesn't always mean you'll like the same.

I haven't heard the silver series or gold 100 though .

It would seem maybe the gold is voiced a little more delicate and slightly less forward in the upper mids?

If you like them, there's not much need to worry unless you're on a free returns and wondering about the other options. They do make a quite compact and nice looking speaker, which isn't always available in other speakers
You’re absolutely right, and the gold sounds good . The only issue is I can’t compare it to anything else right now. And I still need to tweak the room correction a bit more. Throughout my audio upgrade process, I’ve tested several amps and changed many variables while listening to different speakers. So at this point, it’s hard to know what’s really going on.

And honestly, I don’t fully know how to interpret the graphs on the first page. It indeed appears the Golds are less prominent in the high frequencies compared to the silver and bronze—which is a plus since I felt the B&w were too forward. Overall, the Golds’ graphs look a bit messy, and I’m not sure it’s fair to compare ribbon and dome tweeters this way
 
I personally prefer Silver over Gold series with most last gens, especially the Silver 7G VS Gold 5G.

Haven't listened to Gold 6G yet (these were presented at PAVS 2024, bu no way to audition them...)
Have you ever reviewed any gold speakers from the 4g series? Just bought a pair off of Facebook market place, but seem to be able to find very little information, as MA just went through a mass exodus of removing the product pages for their legacy speakers. I can see the frequency response from Google that still shows up in the description. It does look like they're rated at 8 ohms, versus these being rated at 4 ohms and that makes me wonder if the 4g might have been the better pick between the two
 
Back
Top Bottom