• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

HEDD TYPE 05 A-CORE Monitor Review

Rate this studio monitor:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 10 6.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 119 71.3%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 37 22.2%

  • Total voters
    167

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
47,974
Likes
277,784
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review, listening tests, EQ and detailed measurements of the HEDD TYPE-05 A-CORE powered studio speaker (monitor). It was sent to me by the company and costs US $700 each.
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor.jpg

Speaker sports the company trademark AMT tweeter. It eschews the DSP in the more expensive model for a pure, analog audio path, eliminating latency (and lowering cost). Back panel shows consumer friendly input in the form of RCA connection (although I highly recommend balanced):
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor back panel.jpg

Continuous bass and treble controls are better than simple dip switches. The large level control knob is appreciated as well.

Overall build is solid as you expect from a professional brand/product.

EDIT: I ran the CEA-2034 measurements by the company and they said it correlates with their anechoic measurements.

HEDD TYPE 05 A-CORE Monitor Measurements
As usual, we start with our family of frequency response measurements using Klippel Near-field Scanner:
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor anechoic frequency response m...png


Overall on-axis response is flat but with a noticeable bass boost and slight treble lift -- both of which likely can be adjusted to some extend using the controls provided. There are some resonances that you can see the cause of in near-field driver responses (shown later). What is impressive for this little speaker is its bass extension, going as low as 35 Hz despite having just a 5 inch woofer in a small enclosure! Flat response is provided down to 50 Hz.

There is some directivity error which we see in the early window responses:
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor early window frequency respon...png


But when mixed with on-axis, it actually smooths out fair bit:
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor predicted in-room frequency r...png


Here is the near-field response, showing port/cabinet resonances causing minor midrange/low treble disturbances:
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor driver port cabinet frequency...png


Horizontal beam width is good and reasonably wide:
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor horizontal beam width measure...png

Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor horizontal directivity measur...png


Vertical is not but that is typical of 2-way, non-coaxial speakers:
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor vertical directivity measurem...png


Recently I have added 91 dBSPL distortion measurements which came in handy here:

Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor  relative THD percentage dist...png

As noted, all was clean until I reached 96 dBSPL where the woofer started to complain loudly. At the other two SPLs though, it was pleasantly compliant.
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor THD percentage distortion mea...png


Waterfall shows the resonances we have already seen:
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor csd waterfall measurement.png


Step response is uneventful:
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor Step frequency response measu...png


HEDD TYPE 05 A-CORE Listening Tests
I placed the monitor about 4 to 5 feet from me with the tweeter at my ear height. First impression was the bass extension, providing warmth. Alas, it also triggered a room mode, causing some amount of excessive bass notes. I tried to dial in filters to back out the bass boost in the measurements but could not find a good solution. I reached in the back and adjusted the bass knob to what you see in the review picture. I lost a bit of bass but clarity and overall balance remained excellent so I stayed with that. Proper solution would involve measuring the room and identifying the cause but good to have a quick solution like this.

I played my sub-bass heavy tracks and was amazed at the ability of TYPE 05 A-CORE to play those notes at fairly loud levels and with minimum distortion! Hard to imagine a little box doing this. Turn up the volume a bit more though and the ports become cool air blowers, pushing your hair back! :) At that point, distortion is borderline so I backed off.

Partially due to backed off bass level, the highs while delightfully standing out, where a bit above what I like so dialed in a lazy high shelf EQ:
Hedd TYPE 05 A-CORE active analog speaker studio powered monitor equalization eq.png

Again, proper EQ would call for multiple PEQs but this did the job as would probably the knob in the back.

I experimented with correcting a couple of resonances. As you see the amplitude is quite low so to be sure my perception was correct, I tested their efficacy blind. With the 590 Hz I could not reliably detect that (I had reduced its level by ear). The combination of all three was reliably detected mostly due to that high shelf.

I then sat back and enjoyed track after track. All of my reference music sounded wonderful as long as I kept the volume manageable. Note that my testing is with one speaker. With two, I would have gotten more loudness.

Conclusions
From classical evaluation point of view, the TYPE 05 A-CORE goes 90% toward perfection. There are some resonances and directivity errors. However, it brings a very important thing to the party: deep bass extension in "pocket sized" monitor! Research shows that 30% of our preference is in bass (hence the reason "with sub" preference scores are higher). You basically have a full range speaker here. The trade off is lower playback level although you can reduce the bass and get some of that back. So many people reach out to me for a studio monitor in small spaces: the HEDD TYPE 05 will be a good fit for many.

I am going to recommend HEDD TYPE 05 A-CORE.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Reserved for @RickS to kindly post the specs.

  • Main Features
    2-way active nearfield speaker, Pure Analog Signal Path, Plug-and-Play
  • Drivers
    5” custom Honeycomb compound woofer, Air Motion Transformer tweeter
  • Power
    2 x 100 W ICEpower Class D amplifiers
  • Frequency Range
    43 Hz – 50 kHz
  • Crossovers
    2,500 Hz
  • Maximum SPL
    112 dB SPL (per pair, 1m)
  • Inputs
    XLR, TRS (balanced), RCA (unbalanced)
  • Design
    Black satin finish, Front panel LED indicators (active, standby, overload)
  • Dimensions
    308 × 180 × 245 mm
  • Weight
    6.2 kg (net) per unit
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks alright to me. As seems to be the usual case, HEDD is Adam but without their usual pitfalls.
 
I thought the speaker would not benefit from eq but I got surprisingly good results:

score/tonality went from 5.3 to 6.2 which is significant. With a perfect subwoofer the score would be 7.2 and with both EQ and subwoofer 8.1.
It definitively improved ON, LW and PIR at the same time. I was expecting the eq to increase the bass but instead it flatten the listening window.

filters_eq.jpg


Code:
Preamp: -1.8 dB
Filter  1: ON PK Fc    72 Hz Gain -2.40 dB Q 2.33
Filter  2: ON PK Fc   344 Hz Gain +1.28 dB Q 0.52
Filter  3: ON PK Fc   470 Hz Gain -1.99 dB Q 3.00
Filter  4: ON PK Fc   560 Hz Gain +2.05 dB Q 2.99
Filter  5: ON PK Fc  1333 Hz Gain -1.93 dB Q 1.09
Filter  6: ON PK Fc  1954 Hz Gain +3.00 dB Q 1.29
Filter  7: ON PK Fc  3405 Hz Gain -2.22 dB Q 0.57
 
Last edited:
Thanks for testing this.
Not perfect, of course, but still great for the price, IMO.

For my understanding: measurements were done with both Bass and Trebble controls to center, correct ?
 
For my understanding: measurements were done with both Bass and Trebble controls to center, correct ?
For measurements, yes. For listening, it is as you see it in the review picture.
 
Looks alright to me. As seems to be the usual case, HEDD is Adam but without their usual pitfalls.
We had the Hedd here , they had their own pitfalls.
Keith
 
Thanks for the test Amir.
The step response is so close to superb.
Is there any way to optimise it, like lowering the mic position, perhaps?
My guess is "no", but curiosity nags.
 
Whats wrong with ADAM? I thought they were rather like Neumann, just not quite as good. They're another very measurement-centric company.
 
Thanks for the test Amir.
The step response is so close to superb.
Is there any way to optimise it, like lowering the mic position, perhaps?
My guess is "no", but curiosity nags.
My pleasure. The step response is a derived measurement, not its own. It comes from distortion measurement which is at 1/3 meter at acoustic center (tweeter in this case).
 
Too much distortion in the lower treble for me, but in general not bad at all. The brand got a very bad reputation on reliability here altough, so i would not even consider it without those distortions in the lower treble.
 
We cant unread the AsciLab reviews.
Agree but even so, I have to give HEDD credit here, they have crammed a lot of bass into a small box with better distortion than I expected, and the price is not out of line for a powered speaker with this performance IMO.

Speaking from experience you can't just hop out of bed and get 35hz from a driver this size before lunch, it takes real engineering. Two ports of this size on a little box like this don't function properly by accident...

Just looking at the speaker I expected lots of disappointment relative to Ascilab, but I think this speaker justifies itself, there are no trainwrecks here, and some might prefer it for the extra bass output and small size.

Good to see that the bookshelf game isn't totally over yet. If you can't or don't want to run subs, this one might catch your eye. I don't think I would personally get these but I could see them getting recommended for certain setups.
 
Too much distortion in the lower treble for me, but in general not bad at all. The brand got a very bad reputation on reliability here altough, so i would not even consider it without those distortions in the lower treble.
That was precisely my experience.
Keith
 
Whats wrong with ADAM? I thought they were rather like Neumann, just not quite as good. They're another very measurement-centric company.
ADAM, HEDD and Eve Audio have similar origins in Berlin and even creators/engineers that went from one to the other but I also have the feeling that ADAM recently did a step forward showing complete measurement sets and even commenting them with a surprising and applaudable honesty, exemplary https://www.adam-audio.com/content/...dio-monitor-measurement-report-v4-english.pdf
 
We cant unread the AsciLab reviews.
???

This one is smaller but has far better bass extension and low end distortion handling?
Also it's active and cheaper. This high end distortion isn't good but at this point it's plenty masked.

You can use this little guy without a sub, but not the Ascilab.


Edit: Noticed that this time, the price is mentioned per speaker. @amirm please find a convention for that and stick with pair or piece price from there on out.
 
@amirm please find a convention for that and stick with pair or piece price from there on out.
The review index is done that way.
 
Thanks for the test Amir.
The step response is so close to superb.
Is there any way to optimise it, like lowering the mic position, perhaps?
My guess is "no", but curiosity nags.
I personally think it looked a little odd with 3 peaks like that, but if you are running these from a PC I think it would not be super hard to linearize the phase with DSP and fix it.
 
Back
Top Bottom