• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Epos ES 14 N - best passive Speaker in SpiNorama.org so far? (7.4/10 with equalisation without subwoofer)

Also, this is a small company, so if ASR or Erin says they are bad, it’s obvious that the company will run out of business soon as the influence both has on new Age audio consumers is massive.
Oh, big smile….. Epos is part of the Demant Group (Switzerland) the world leader in hearing technology in healthcare.
Other parts of the Demant Group are Neumann and Sennheiser Communication Systems
Do you even know who you are talking about here?
It is not very likely that Erin or @amirm don‘t like the Epos.
Look at the Wharfedale Linton 85 Anniversary Test by Erin (his favorite sub 2.000 Dollar Speaker!)
https://www.erinsaudiocorner.com/loudspeakers/wharfedale_linton_85/
Look at Amir’s Review of the Wharfedale Diamond 12.1
All these Speaker are Constructed by Karl-Heinz Fink!
By the way: He has also worked for Vifa and Scanspeak - helping them to devolop the Speakers! The Speaker Chassis
all the other manufacturers used - so KHF is no pillow pooper - more the level of Andrew Jones!
 
I suspect that was more effective marketing than effective engineering.
Some Companies can effort the extra Cost of the Klippel Laserinterferometer, helping to get the Cabinet clean from Vibrations, others not.
The Companies who invest, know exactly what they do and why they do the extra research!

I don‘t know if Wilson did any research in this direction. They just kill every cabinet resonance by their sheer massiveness and the Material they use:
Corian, by Du Pont, invented in 1969. There was no marketing after the exebition. Just some guys who listen a few Songs after the show and me, who asked his self: Why is this so damn good?
And I remembered a Podcast with KHF who outed himself as a fan of the Wilson Kabinetts, and how he tried to get the same results with Klippel and Laserinterferrometrie and some nice design skills for much less money than Wilson.
Corian, an artificial stone is expensive (1.000 mm x 1.000 mm x 12 mm about USD 500,—)
 
Mass just pushes up the resonant frequencies.
Wilson speakers really measure quite poorly, their ‘success’ ( in this country at least) is purely down to massive marketing.
Keith
 
Mass just pushes up the resonant frequencies.
Wilson speakers really measure quite poorly, their ‘success’ ( in this country at least) is purely down to massive marketing.
Keith
Do you think, it is just a subjektive feeling, if I think my LS3/5a (Bitumen inside) or a massive Wilson speaker has less Cabinet based sound colouration than, let’s say a typical 1.1 m high mediocre floorstanding speaker?
Perhaps the addition of mass puts the frequency’s up, but they are also much less loud.
Knock with your ankle on the stone guitar of the Beatles monument in Liverpool (Autsch )
After that: Knock with your ankle on a real guitar. Which is louder?
 
if ASR or Erin says they are bad, it’s obvious that the company will run out of business soon as the influence both has on new Age audio consumers is massive.
Some people are paying attention no doubt, but in the world of high end audiophilia I think ASR is pointedly ignored.
 
This could be taken to mean that a smaller manufacturer should fear the verdict of Erin or Amir. But perhaps that is what the "new age audio consumer" really relies on. They no longer trust their own judgement, or are too lazy to form their own judgement in the first place. (I don't know if this is true, it's just a thought that comes to mind).
Amir did some funny remarks in this direction: „Can you trust your Ears?“ Answer: „no, of course not“!
Or when he is Testing voodoo stuff. Then he is sometimes joking: „I was shocked! It sounded so much better….“
Then eyes closed, switching the button 20 times. Not knowing which source is operating. Not able to reproduce the differences he first heared…..
 
Some people are paying attention no doubt, but in the world of high end audiophilia I think ASR is pointedly ignored.

As in the comments on this Stereophile review, starting with post #20 ......


Jim
 
I don‘t know if Wilson did any research in this direction. They just kill every cabinet resonance by their sheer massiveness and the Material they use:
Excluding their marketing department, who's effectiveness you are demonstrating, it doesn't look like it. See this for an example.
 
Do you think, it is just a subjektive feeling, if I think my LS3/5a (Bitumen inside) or a massive Wilson speaker has less Cabinet based sound colouration than, let’s say a typical 1.1 m high mediocre floorstanding speaker?
Perhaps the addition of mass puts the frequency’s up, but they are also much less loud.
Knock with your ankle on the stone guitar of the Beatles monument in Liverpool (Autsch )
After that: Knock with your ankle on a real guitar. Which is louder?
It only counts if you can hear it in the speaker. Knocking on sculptures and musical instruments is useless. Everyone know what knocking on a stone and an intentionally resonant cavity will do. That’s a good example of dumb marketing talk.

Solid cabinets have higher resonances, but when they are triggered they ring persistently. There is another school of thought (espoused by those following in your own speaker’s designer’s footsteps) that speaker resonance should be damped at lower frequency to inaudible levels.

Either way, it shows up in measurements and does or doesn’t reach an audible level ( and even then may be masked). I’ve found three sets of Wilsons fatiguing. Probably just due to uneven HF response or dispersion.


 
Last edited:
Mass just pushes up the resonant frequencies.
I think actually more stiffness increases the frequency of resonance, but mass per se (with the same bracing pattern or whatever) tends to absorb more energy overall? With sheer mass I think more is more, although what you really want is damping or more internal reflections via well-thought-out layering, not just a big dumb block of stiff material, which doesn't necessarily help a lot.
 
As in the comments on this Stereophile review, starting with post #20 ......


Jim
One of the comments:
I don't know what Ohm's Law and I don't effing care. I know some basics.
Bahahha which is it? I'd love to know what's more basic to electronics than that...
 
Because, he doesn’t want to get bashed by either of them. Neutral - best at ASR and Erin’s. His speaker will loose marks at both places as they are not neutral. Also, this is a small company, so if ASR or Erin says they are bad, it’s obvious that the company will run out of business soon as the influence both has on new Age audio consumers is massive.

I don’t think non neutral speakers are bad.
The speakers don't have to come from Dave Fabricant. There must be an owner who could spare one for the couple of months Amir or Erin would need to test and review it. Most gear comes to ASR and Erin from customers, not the manufacturers.
 
As in the comments on this Stereophile review, starting with post #20 ......


Jim
1697238406116.png


LOL
 
Keith
I think actually more stiffness increases the frequency of resonance, but mass per se (with the same bracing pattern or whatever) tends to absorb more energy overall? With sheer mass I think more is more, although what you really want is damping or more internal reflections via well-thought-out layering, not just a big dumb block of stiff material, which doesn't necessarily help a lot.
I think you are right, adding mass actually lowers the natural frequency, however the enclosure is constructed it shouldn’t store energy which could lead to audible resonance.
Keith
 
Amir did some funny remarks in this direction: „Can you trust your Ears?“ Answer: „no, of course not“!
Or when he is Testing voodoo stuff. Then he is sometimes joking: „I was shocked! It sounded so much better….“
Then eyes closed, switching the button 20 times. Not knowing which source is operating. Not able to reproduce the differences he first heared…..
I am having a hard time understanding your comment!
 
Do you think, it is just a subjektive feeling, if I think my LS3/5a (Bitumen inside) or a massive Wilson speaker has less Cabinet based sound colouration than, let’s say a typical 1.1 m high mediocre floorstanding speaker?
Perhaps the addition of mass puts the frequency’s up, but they are also much less loud.
Knock with your ankle on the stone guitar of the Beatles monument in Liverpool (Autsch )
After that: Knock with your ankle on a real guitar. Which is louder?
Is this the Wilson you are talking about? Interesting.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8816.jpeg
    IMG_8816.jpeg
    875.5 KB · Views: 74
Oh, big smile….. Epos is part of the Demant Group (Switzerland) the world leader in hearing technology in healthcare.
Other parts of the Demant Group are Neumann and Sennheiser Communication Systems
Do you even know who you are talking about here?
It is not very likely that Erin or @amirm don‘t like the Epos.
Look at the Wharfedale Linton 85 Anniversary Test by Erin (his favorite sub 2.000 Dollar Speaker!)
https://www.erinsaudiocorner.com/loudspeakers/wharfedale_linton_85/
Look at Amir’s Review of the Wharfedale Diamond 12.1
All these Speaker are Constructed by Karl-Heinz Fink!
By the way: He has also worked for Vifa and Scanspeak - helping them to devolop the Speakers! The Speaker Chassis
all the other manufacturers used - so KHF is no pillow pooper - more the level of Andrew Jones!
Epos is a brand by Fink consulting, who also has another more expensive brand called “Fink Team”. There is another Epos which I believe is the speaker phone or gaming audio brand by sennheiser which has nothing to do with Epos the speaker company.

Mr. KHZ is a talented designer. I had several speakers which he had designed for his older brands like IQ, ALR, and so on. All of them had a typical sound which is enjoyable but not neutral.

Wharfedale Lintons were not designed by KHz but diamonds were.
 
My objection to the use of polypropylene in the woofer cones was because of its durability and not because of the sound. I suppose that, as with steel or cement, by alloying/mixing it with other materials its properties will improve.

My real objection to the new EPOS ES14N is regarding the low quality of the filter components considering the price of the speakers, €4,000. To understand each other, it is like buying a high-end car whose seats are not covered in leather.

index.php
It’s stupid to look at the compnents and to judge how it’s gonna sound. If that’s the case, the KEF LS50 and R Series would be the worst value for money you can get. But they are amazing speakers.
 
Back
Top Bottom