• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Do Audio Speakers Break-in?

tuga

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
3,984
Likes
4,285
Location
Oxford, England
The guys at Matrix Hi-Fi did a piece on this subject years ago:


Speakers Burn In: What manufacturers say...

Having read an article published by Mr. Bruce Coppola, where speaker burn in was the subject, we were surprised to read on one sentence that speaker units are delivered already burned in at the factory, so as a result of it, no burn in period is needed by the end user. Link to the article: http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/BurnInLegend.pdf
This caught our attention, since inspite of being this contrary to what most manufacturers, all magazines and retailers says, and Matrix HiFi might have taken this as truthful (if it were true the alledged anti.manufacturers, anti-retailers and anti-reviewers attitude that is commonly branded to Matrix HiFi) without investigating any further this information, we decided to conduct a small poll going directly to the manufacturers to ask what they thought about this issue.


SCANSPEAK

“I checked with the head R&D engineer for Scan-Speak, and here is how he responded to your question:
The drive units are not "burned in" when they leave our factory. However, the Thiele/Small parameters for Scan-Speak drivers are always given for units that are burned in - for the simple reason that it makes the designer's job easier, as all speakers will end up being burned in. Speaker units will automatically burn in when they are being used. If you buy a brand new speaker system (which normally is not burned in), complete burn-in will take about a month - depending on how often (and how loud) you listen to music. During burn-in the sound quality should improve.
There is a fast way to do it and the speaker designer should burn in the units (especially the woofers) before tuning the cabinet volume, damping material and port length (vented speaker) and trimming the cross-over network.
All you need is a sine wave generator and a power amplifier. Keep the drive unit in free air. Set the frequency to about 75% of the expected free air resonance frequency of the drive unit and turn up the voltage until the cone reaches full excursion without making mechanical noise. Let it run for 5 minutes and the job is done.
Notice that only Scan-Speak parameters are given for burned in drivers. You can expect the free air resonance frequency to drop about 10% (in some cases even up to 15% - the stiffer the spider, the bigger the change) during break-in. Naturally this affects the Q-values (they go down) and the equivalent volume (Vas goes up), as it is the suspension compliance that increases.”

Our Comments:
A very thorough explanation, very technical, and informing what method we should expect from a good designer to use and apply when calculating loudspeakers and chosing units. Would designers do this?

In about 5 minutes, the cones are burnt in with a signal tone. Using music, in about a month (depending of the frequency and volume we listen music at). At a rate of 3 hours daily, 90 hours would be all what we need to have our speakers burnt in




ATC

“We do not consider 'burn in' an issue. When our loudspeakers leave the factory they are in perfect working order and their performance will not change over time unless they are not cared for or get very old.
I think 'burn in' was probably invented by hi-fi dealers so that when they sell a cable for 500 euros and the customer complains he can't hear any difference the dealer can tell them it needs 'burning in'. After the customer has waited for two weeks for the cable to 'burn in' he has forgotten how his system sounded in the first place and can't be bothered to complain again.”


Our Comments:
What a reply!! We insisted on the subject, since this was the first direct answer, and curiously was at the same time dealing with cables and its unexistent virtues (We at Matrix HiFi are 100% coincident with this statement), so our second question received this reply:
“Hearing stories of 2300 Euro cables makes me quite angry. You can't put all the blame with the dealer, he is heavily influenced by the press who push benefits of cable and yes, perhaps manufacturers who do not believe in 'hi-end' cable should do more to let their customers know. I think the trick is to go to Hi-Fi shops wearing a blindfold. If it was only your ears you used to choose equipment then you would probably have a better system.
The facts are, no cable can improve the sound. A poor cable can only degrade the sound. I think that a lot of the 'sound' certain cables produce are down to problems with the design. For example, a cable with high capacitance attenuating the high frequencies.
Alot of it is also down to 'system tuning'. I think this is another silly idea - using a 'dull' component to cancel the effect of a 'bright' component. If manufacturers designed high performance, neutral components in the first place then this would not be needed. But saying that, with Hi-Fi, it is down to personal preferance.
As I think you have guessed, there are no magical solutions. Good audio equipment comes from good engineering. There are some psycho-acoustic phenomenon that we do not understand, but every other characteristic of an audio system can be measured accurately using modern test equipment. If a manufacturer does not have data to back up their claims then they are probably making it up.”

Our Comments:
When reading such a direct and clear answer, we can only say that we’d wish all manufacturers were as open and honest as this one. 

BTW, ATC supports blind tests to evaluate systems…and before you ask: no, we are not affiliated nor have any commercial interests with this particular brand.



VIFA

“Tak for din mail. Tilspilning af højttalerenheder er som regel hørbart. Graden afhænger af enhedstypen, men Vifa's lavtabsophæng gør, at enhederne er lidt mindre følsomme overfor dette.
Der er ingen grund til at tilspille produkterne før de forlader fabrikken. Blot skal man sørge for, at de enheder man benytter til at afstemme højttaleren med, og designe delefiltret, allerede er tilspillede”

Our Comments:
Much the same response received from Scan Speak (no wonder they are part of the same group). 

They are not being over explicit, they do not mention anything about the virtues of burning in a speaker unit, they use vague terminology such as “usually audible” and “the degree of audibility depends on the unit type” are not indicating us much, but at least confirms what we suspected: the speaker units are not burnt in prior to leaving the factory.



JBL PRO

“I would say for very accurate precision tooled devices, the burn in period would be relatively short, if not non existent. Devices like these would be designed in a way to give maximum accuracy right out of the box. Perhaps it might take a few hours for the paper to settle, but minimum time period for this type of device.
Musical instrument speakers are a different story. The reports vary depending upon the desired result. If you are refurbishing a 40 or 50 year old amp, many times a good technician will really work out the fresh cone that is to be loaded with some test signal so that the paper will soften and sound more like what the player has grown accustomed to. Many of the vintage replacement speaker companies "pre break in" their off the shelf product. I have heard of different techniques to do this if this is not the case. In this application it is often desirable to soften the paper before use.
We "burn test" our speakers for power rating purposes but a fresh from the factory cone has only had test signal passed through it at the test booth on the line. We don't "break in" our paper.
For highly accurate JBL products this has been my personal experience:
Short (if not non-existent) break in period, then many years of accurate replication and then many years later eventual cone fatigue and the need for recone. I have been using JBL products since the 70's myself and gone through many recones/refurbs so I have a good deal of experience with fresh paper. I have recently reconed my 20 year old 4412 studio monitors. They had gotten a little "floppy" sounding and even thought the compliance was still in tact, it was time for fresh cones.
Guitar applications are a bit different and it really depends upon what you are trying to achieve. In some cases, I tend to like fairly well fatigued cones for certain guitar sounds. I have a 40 year old D120f with original paper (pretty crusty with patches). I will use this one just as it is until the coil burns or the cone falls completely apart. I love the way this speaker sounds! For clean applications, the fresher the paper, the cleaner the sound.
The bottom line is that from the moment a speaker starts to move air, the vibrations are impacting the cone. In some cases there might be a brief settling in period, but long term impact of sustained vibration is the eventual fatiguing of the cones. The more fatigued a cone becomes, the less accurate a device it is likely to be. So, if you want long term accuracy and maximum useful life of your speakers, do not put them through any rigorous "paper softening" process. The logical conclusion is that you will only shorten the useful life span of the speaker. If accuracy is not your goal and some form of "coloration" of the signal is what you have in mind (like for a guitar application) then go for it, it probably makes sense for what you are doing and you are not negatively impacting the long term end result.”

Our Comments:
Surprisingly, this manufacturer tells us about not forcing the run in period by using a signal tone, we’d only shorten the life span of it and add colorations to the sound.


AUDIOTECHNOLOGY

“Thanks for your mail.
Your question is a good question and I will try to answer it as well as possible.
There is great difference between the different drivers, when it comes to “running in”
A woofer can be run in relatively quickly, but in hours? – I am not sure. Our woofers, with a relatively high compliance, can be run in, in a day or so, where the more stiff drivers, like PA drivers takes a week or more. 
When it comes to midranges, it is another story. The sound of a midrange can change up to month after it has been played for the first time. I personally, have recently become the lucky owner of a pair of Peak Consult “El Diablo” – a true work of art – but that is another story. When they were first connected, the sound was impressive but not great, but after a couple of days, the bass was wonderful. I played them 24/7 to break them in as fast as possible. Now, after 2 month, the midrange is also great. It has been changing every day, since the first. The tweeter is still changing – bringing less “S” sounds to the female voices and adding to the image day by day. Today my listening room tends to be much bigger than it really is, and is still getting bigger (hope the walls wound fall down on me).
As you can understand, it is individual how long time it takes to burn in a speaker, but in general you can say that the bigger the driver, the faster it will be run in or you could express it in another way also: The more the cone moves, the faster the driver is run in.
Hope this answer is adequate for you. Otherwise, please write again.”

So we did:
“Thanks for a very clarifying reply, however, it raises up another question:
If a driver sounds better after burn in, why is it that (apparently) no manufacturer sells its units already burnt in? 
Also, is there a certain music program preferred or to avoid when burning in a driver?”

And the anwer to our second mail was:
“Thanks for your mail.
Yes, you are right – we ought to burn in all the drivers, but – we do not have the time or the facilities to do it.
It is the same with a car………. It also runs better and has better fuel economy after some thousand miles, but can you imagine the Toyota factories driving some thousand miles before delivering each car?
There is no preferred music, when burning in speakers. I personally use pink noise, when I am not at home. Else any music that makes the drivers move as much as possible.”

Our Comments:
Blah, blah, blah,…we can’t say we were impressed considering the manufacturer’s reputattion. He was an inch away from offering for sale the Peak Consult speakers…
However, he’s telling us that it depends of the cone type. Woofers with high compliance can be burnt in on one day, while mids might need up to a month…


NcHbFDn.png



link: http://matrixhifi.com/ENG_contenedor_rodajealtavoces.htm
 
Last edited:

anmpr1

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Messages
3,741
Likes
6,460
...everything only gets better, the wife comes running even faster out of the kitchen and Diana Krall virtually sings even closer on your lap. ;)

Don't know about your situation, but the last thing I need is waifu coming out of the kitchen and finding Diana K. close to my lap. Then I'd be the one getting broken in. And thrown out. And everything in-between.
 

ctrl

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 24, 2020
Messages
1,638
Likes
6,249
Location
.de, DE, DEU
So, I did another break-in comparison - first comparison see post#61. This time with a mid-bass driver from SBAcoustics - SB17NAC35-4.

To avoid any misunderstandings, each driver was played with a low frequency sine for one or two minutes to find obvious manufacturing errors and to "break-in" chassis-spider and suspension before the first measurement.

But this has nothing to do with the break-in discussed here, where chassis are played for 20 hours or more with a low frequency sine, or where the consumer needs 100 hours or more with normal music.

There are almost two years between the impedance and near-field measurements.
- There are slight differences in the impedance measurement (at high frequencies), because I have recalibrated the measuring cable compensation.
- When interpreting the near field measurement, please note that the differences in a far field measurement are much smaller and the frequency response would look different.

yellow = 04-2018, green = 03-2020
1583585151382.png


red = 04-2018, yellow = 03-2020
1583585167420.png


As with the Dayton subwoofer measurement, there is practically no difference to be seen. The resonance frequency did not change even by 1Hz (meant as a figure of speech, minimal differences already exist due to the measurement inaccuracy ;)), just like the Dayton chassis.
The SBAcoustics chassis shows an outstanding uniform quality over the period of use (up to now two years), as one would expect from a good chassis.
 
Last edited:

raif71

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
2,346
Likes
2,563
Didn't read all of the posts here but has anybody suggested to the speaker vendors that asks people to break-in the units why they themselves didn't break-in the speakers before selling to consumers? Shouldn't be hard to do
 

Prana Ferox

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Feb 6, 2020
Messages
936
Likes
1,934
Location
NoVA, USA
The analogy of instrument string breakin isn't great. Strings go from storage at rest to being placed under tension, and noticeably stretch out. Further, they're polished by greasy human fingers, changing tone and feel. Hopefully neither is happening to your speaker drivers.

Headphones have similar physical interactions where the earpiece cushions / springs get worn and flexed, which changes the sound. Hopefully this only happens when the headphones are newish, otherwise it's called 'wearing out'.
 

daftcombo

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
3,688
Likes
4,070
Hi @amirm ,

Could you do the same kind of comparison with a well-behaved speaker with grills on / without grills on?
 

Jinjuku

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Messages
1,279
Likes
1,180
What a silly, pedantic topic this is.

Even assuming speaker break-in is real, what are you going to do about it??
Redesign the box and/or crossover network to accommodate it after the fact?
Return speakers to the manufacturer because they broke in? Or didn't break in?

"Break in", in this context, is simply an excuse given to customers to explain/mitigate disappointments in subjective evaluations.

Good golly.

Dave.

Yep. If anyone listens to their setups long enough it's all 'broken in'. Not much you can do about it.
 

ROOSKIE

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 27, 2020
Messages
1,936
Likes
3,527
Location
Minneapolis
Frequency response is the same but there are other factors.
I have deff had bass go from sounding a bit tight and congested to opening up/warming up during break in.
Anyway so many people on both sides of the fence.
I have tried so many speakers. No doubt in my mind that break in is real. With some speakers not much changes and with some it seems like a reasonably obvious difference, ( never night and day tho)
The spider and surround are likely softening up.
Anyway several speaker driver manufacturers state it is real to them. Generally I've heard 10ish hours of medium loud to loud playback is enough - with some exceptions.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,741
Likes
242,005
Location
Seattle Area

A800

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 22, 2019
Messages
734
Likes
616
Frequency response is the same but there are other factors.
I have deff had bass go from sounding a bit tight and congested to opening up/warming up during break in.
Anyway so many people on both sides of the fence.
I have tried so many speakers. No doubt in my mind that break in is real. With some speakers not much changes and with some it seems like a reasonably obvious difference, ( never night and day tho)
The spider and surround are likely softening up.
Anyway several speaker driver manufacturers state it is real to them. Generally I've heard 10ish hours of medium loud to loud playback is enough - with some exceptions.

This.
The last PA sub driver I used (4 pieces, all identical) needed like around 50 hrs to "loosen up"/break in.
Out of the box there hasn't been much detail and LF extension simply wasn't where it should be.
But a nice "artificial"/dominant kick.
I can't believe how someone seriously is denying facts like speaker break-in.

Now for some more speaker break-in denying/trolling below this post...
 

Dimitri

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
368
Likes
428
Location
Valencia California
Hi @amirm ,

Could you do the same kind of comparison with a well-behaved speaker with grills on / without grills on?

This must be the easiset "blind test" to perform. While listening, have someone else "block the speaker " with the grille. I believe some grilles are more acoustically transparent than others.
But I know whether playing music or not, I prefer looking at speakers with the grilles off.
And if there are kids, pets or flying objects around, listening to music is more relaxing with the grilles on.
Some of the above can be tested :)
 

BDWoody

Chief Cat Herder
Moderator
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
7,096
Likes
23,633
Location
Mid-Atlantic, USA. (Maryland)
I can't believe how someone seriously is denying facts like speaker break-in.
.

Do you consider your experience one of the 'facts' I am not considering?

If there are actual facts to be shared, I haven't seen them... Lots of 'I know what I hear' stuff...but so what else is new?
 
Last edited:

A800

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 22, 2019
Messages
734
Likes
616
Do you consider your experience one of the facts I am not considering?

If there are actual facts to be shared, I haven't seen them... Lots of 'I know what I hear' stuff...but so what else is new?

No idea.
I only know the only thing you can halfway rely on is personal experience.
If you get new PA sub drivers and listen to them (and feel them on high power) out of the box and later, my experience should be easily reproducible on your end.
 

BDWoody

Chief Cat Herder
Moderator
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
7,096
Likes
23,633
Location
Mid-Atlantic, USA. (Maryland)
I only know the only thing you can halfway rely on is personal experience.

I guess I don't know that at all...

Uncontrolled listening impressions are some of the least reliable 'data points' I could think of.

I am not denying it...specifically...but I haven't seen anything like proof or actual meaningful data that would convince me it was true.
 
Last edited:

ta240

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
1,451
Likes
2,909
Apparently not every F1 driver believes that tyres need break-in:

ScornfulDeepAsianpiedstarling-size_restricted.gif

That isn't "break-in" that is warm-up or keep-warm and racing tires do need to be warm to work well. That is why drivers will often do the same pattern under a caution flag and sometimes even have heaters wrapped around tires in the pits. My guess would be that driver is heading to the pits under a yellow flag so he doesn't care if his tires stay hot.
 
Last edited:

ta240

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
1,451
Likes
2,909
Didn't read all of the posts here but has anybody suggested to the speaker vendors that asks people to break-in the units why they themselves didn't break-in the speakers before selling to consumers? Shouldn't be hard to do

Sure it is easy, just time consuming and time is money. Sure, the super high end guys with limited production could do it but could you imagine companies like Polk plugging all their speakers in for 100 hours before packaging and shipping?

Would any of the before and after tests done here show if a driver is moving more easily; isn't that what 'breaks-in' if something does? Does a frequency sweep or impedance test reflect how a driver moves. For the record, I'm not arguing that break-in is a thing I'm just curious if these tests would show if it is a thing or not.

For the science of the test shouldn't we identify what, in theory, is being done during break-in and then model the tests to check for that specific change? If we throw the science in the name out and just accept that it doesn't happen then we are the same as those that just accept that it does happen.
 

MRC01

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
3,502
Likes
4,137
Location
Pacific Northwest
That isn't "break-in" that is warm-up or keep-warm and racing tires do need to be warm to work well. That is why drivers will often do the same pattern under a caution flag and sometimes even have heaters wrapped around tires in the pits. My guess would be that driver is heading to the pits under a yellow flag so he doesn't care if his tires stay hot.
It's actually more than just heating up. New competition tires need a few heat cycles in order to reach optimum grip. This is a break-in period where you need heat them up gently, then let them cool off, repeat a few times. All without stressing the tire - gentle driving, no hard accel, braking or cornering. If you don't do this the tire will not perform as well, nor last as long, as it should. Back when I used to race cars, companies like Tire Rack offered a service to heat cycle new tires before shipping them.

Regarding speaker break-in, the manual for my Magnepan 3.6/R says the bass response will gain a few Hz deeper after several hours of play. Seems reasonable, as it's a mechanical system. I don't recall hearing any difference, but I've had them 20 years so that memory has faded.
 

mansr

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 5, 2018
Messages
4,685
Likes
10,705
Location
Hampshire
Does a frequency sweep or impedance test reflect how a driver moves.
Yes. If the compliance of the suspension changes, resonance peaks will move and/or change shape. The movement of the cone contributes to the impedance, so that measurement will also differ. In fact, it's really just different ways of measuring the same thing.
 

A800

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 22, 2019
Messages
734
Likes
616
I guess I don't know that at all...

Ucontrolled listening impressions are some of the least reliable 'data points' I could think of.

I am not denying it...specifically...but I haven't seen anything like proof or actual meaningful data that would convince me it was true.

The only real proof is personal experience.
 
Top Bottom