More bass, and with an upgraded woofer, tweeter, and crossover, I assume the LX should also have better clarity and detail.
Same tweeter is used in the LX and the Sierra 1 v2.
More bass, and with an upgraded woofer, tweeter, and crossover, I assume the LX should also have better clarity and detail.
I'm not sure where I saw the review now. But there were air leaks around the binding posts and maybe the drivers, which was changing the frequency response. I believe there were some screws not tightened, can't remember everything now, but several issues.
And I wasn't interested in paying over $6,000 CDN and still have to rebuild them properly.
Probably someone who hasn't understood the value of Klippel NFS optimization yet and sees it as a negative. Just read the thread a bitWho the hell voted "poor"??
It's never Zero lolWho the hell voted "poor"??
Graphs look well optimized. Really curious to hear how they perform IRL. Too bad they're impossible to audition here in Europe, so the chance of me ever hearing a pair is zero.
Hahaha, fair enough. I was being a bit dramatic, I suppose. Still... Would love to hear what these sound like in the real world.It's never Zero lol
At least while you're alive
The LX uses a bigger magnet for the woofer, apparently for higher power handling and less distortion.I find the LX interesting due to its high power handling for a stand mount.
I've known some people who just hate speakers that are not efficient, the sensitivity is not exactly high..Who the hell voted "poor"??
Graphs look well optimized. Really curious to hear how they perform IRL. Too bad they're impossible to audition here in Europe, so the chance of me ever hearing a pair is zero.
I've known some people who just hate speakers that are not efficient, the sensitivity is not exactly high..
I find it quite a surprise that Steve Hoffman is so big. I just went and took a look after being absent for 4 or 5 years. It's real heavy on vinyl but otherwise seems to lack a focus.No apology needed since that is not true.Here are the latest stats:
![]()
We dwarf traditional press and compete for top spot for the most popular audio site in the world.
I find it quite a surprise that Steve Hoffman is so big. I just went and took a look after being absent for 4 or 5 years. It's real heavy on vinyl but otherwise seems to lack a focus.
It's a cray-cray place. Absolute ban on anything even remotely related to DBT, and they're tube-crazy, cable believers, and ultra-ultra subjectivists who almost totally despise ASR.I find it quite a surprise that Steve Hoffman is so big. I just went and took a look after being absent for 4 or 5 years. It's real heavy on vinyl but otherwise seems to lack a focus.
Many (most?) audiophiles are anti science without even knowing it.It's a cray-cray place. Absolute ban on anything even remotely related to DBT, and they're tube-crazy, cable believers, and ultra-ultra subjectivists who almost totally despise ASR.
Not so much around here.Many (most?) audiophiles are anti science without even knowing it.
Obviously, hence the title and the focus and why I come here.Not so much around here.
Give me such speaker and take my money or shut upI suspect based on experience that, in A/B comparison with a speaker with similar midband dispersion and headroom that does not make the same tradeoffs - i.e. a more tailored waveguide geometry allows on-axis is flattish and smooth, with the horizontal directivity is well matched at the crossover - the latter would be preferred by most. That few such speakers exist, let alone at a similar price point with like quality components and build quality, is a fair retort.