I can think of many factors, such as:
- physical design in the layout, if you look at the Denon A1H, and many of the relatively expensive McIntosh's and Luxman amps, EI core Tx might have fit better than Toroids.
- shielding scheme design, in some cases, the designers may prefer toroidal because it is better in terms of lesser less leakage vs EI core ones. Denon custom designed their EI core tx to address the more leakage flux/EMI related issues.
- Cost, on all else being equal basis, toroids are more costly, though all else are usually not equal. Two of my cheapest amp, QSC RMX850a I ever purchased, C$338, about US$260 in 2017, now about USD700!, and my also cheap NAD C326, uses toroids, my vintage Marantz amp uses EI core, that's examples that show cost is not always the factor.
- Weight, also on all else being equal basis, toroids would likely weigh less.
- Start up surge current: toroids typically have much higher inrush currents (again, only if all else being equal), so for larger power amps, it may cost more if the designer has to include some sort of soft start circuitry.
Here's a technical article on the benefits of EI core transformers, for audio amps:
"But putting an EI-frame in a tightly packed multi-channel amp or receiver is just about impossible...there just isn’t enough room to stay away from the radiated magnetic field. In those applications, you will almost always find toroidal power transformers."
Are EI-frame transformers more prevalent in home audio now since the '98 article?