xirtam2005
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2022
- Messages
- 144
- Likes
- 42
It's an honest question. I'm not criticizing the Buckeye in any way.
It's an honest question. I'm not criticizing the Buckeye in any way.
Ok, here's an honest answer. Nobody on this planet would be able to hear any difference between the Buckeye amp and any other competantly-designed solid state amplifer.It's an honest question. I'm not criticizing the Buckeye in any way.
This is a new amp with great measurements - my question - > how does this amplifier sound? How will it sound compared to something like a Parasound Halo A31 in real world music and movie applications? I know it'll beat the pants off of it in SINAD and running more efficient and cooler, but what about actual sound?
I would add that any differences heard would be completely subjective in nature, notwithstanding that different combinations of equipment would produce different results. There is no way to make a universal "it sounds like this" statement. If, however, you are wondering how it tastes... slightly metallic, though largely dependent on condiments used, if any.Ok, here's an honest answer. Nobody on this planet would be able to hear any difference between the Buckeye amp and any other competantly-designed solid state amplifer.
Well that's where we disagree. I think it tastes like chicken.I would add that any differences heard would be completely subjective in nature, notwithstanding that different combinations of equipment would produce different results. There is no way to make a universal "it sounds like this" statement. If, however, you are wondering how it tastes... slightly metallic, though largely dependent on condiments used, if any.
Depends on how hard you hit it, and with what.This is a new amp with great measurements - my question - > how does this amplifier sound?
I think the concept is called MVP, minimum viable product. No joke.These days Audio is tested by sending out products to guinea pigs. When it is found to be defective, the company is praised for correcting it. Lets hope so. Use to be consumers demanded quality products off the hop.... Now they celebrate receiving defective product, and having it repaired.
No downside. The Auto mode trips in about 1-2 seconds.@Buckeye Amps Is there any downside to using the 'auto' mode over 'on' in e.g. time to power on/first start outputting audio? What's the idle power draw in 'on' mode?
Thank you!! I got the Purifi in the mail today and it's working great.No downside. The Auto mode trips in about 1-2 seconds.
In On mode, the SMPS is still idle and will draw a few watts
I need to learn how this works. I have D90 and A90 so I think I can make the 12V trigger somehow…I use the 12v trigger to turn mine on. Works great and sounds great!
I use the 12v trigger to turn mine on. Works great and sounds great!
Do you know if the 12V trigger turns the amp completely off, or at least down to 0.5W or less? I'd prefer to use the trigger vs. manually flipping a switch, if it works similarly.The Buckeye Stereo Purifi uses 14W when idle with the Power "On" mode selected. It only uses 14.5W while driving the Revel F328BE to 75dB. Personally, I prefer turning the amp off when not in use and use the "On" power mode. The Buckeye "auto" mode can sometimes allow audio dropouts with low volume classical music and may require a few seconds of music signal before it starts to play.
Thanks, so I guess that means we're looking at 14 Watts using 12V trigger, like @amper42 measured in Auto mode.It won’t be the 0.5W as the Hypex SMPS will be on standby mode and not off it using Auto or 12v.
One change we hope to make late this year is better control of the SMPS to further bring down idle/standby wattage
Agree re: power usage, I posted a similar request on another thread, a few "likes" ensued. Power consumption should be added to all electronics under test - whether an amp, an AVR, or just a simple DAC. Two good things would come out of this: (1) consumers would get smarter about how creative (or lazy) various companies are, which drives (2) OEM's would pay more attention to power consumption (including Standby modes) and step up their game.I don't think Dylan has a Kill-o-watt to measure watts used by the Buckeye Purifi in different configurations. I asked him for that data previously and it was answered with "a few watts" instead of exact measurements. I use the Purifi with the ADI-2 DAC FS and did not have a trigger. There will always be some power used by any amp in trigger mode as it needs to be waiting for a signal to become active. How much would require a measuring device and a DAC or AVR setup in trigger mode with the Purifi connected.
I would like to see power usage added to ASR reviews. In the case of the Buckeye Purifi the review could report idle power use in "On" mode, "trigger" mode and "Auto". My guess is the power use in trigger mode may be close to leaving the Purifi in "On" mode while idle. The 14W idle power use of the Purifi is significantly lower than the 23W idle power use of the Buckeye NC502MP.