• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

3e Audio TPA3255 Amplifier Kit 480-1-29A Review

Rate this amplifier (kit):

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 3 1.3%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 7 3.1%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 42 18.7%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 173 76.9%

  • Total voters
    225

3eaudio

Active Member
Audio Company
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
137
Likes
294
Hi Amigos
want to share some info on Rev B released recently:
  1. Input Opamp Change to OPA1556,this is due to part unified that we found it perform the same as OPA1612 in another project.
  2. add a optional 12V connector (not populated) for some people that need for power LEDs,etc.
  3. Buck cap change to 1500uF/80V/Nichicon due to 1800uF/63V/Rubycon not able to purchase.
1712838093053.png

share a test between OPA1612 and OPA1656
THD+N Ratio vs Measured Level.jpg
 

daniboun

Major Contributor
Joined
May 2, 2020
Messages
1,884
Likes
2,212
Location
France (Lyon)
Hi Amigos
want to share some info on Rev B released recently:
  1. Input Opamp Change to OPA1556,this is due to part unified that we found it perform the same as OPA1612 in another project.
  2. add a optional 12V connector (not populated) for some people that need for power LEDs,etc.
  3. Buck cap change to 1500uF/80V/Nichicon due to 1800uF/63V/Rubycon not able to purchase.
View attachment 362979
share a test between OPA1612 and OPA1656

Thanks for sharing. In my next project it is a question of measuring this V2 module via APx555.
On the other hand, I got the Rev B but with 1800uF/63V/Rubycon caps, same as Rev A.....

index.php
 

olieb

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
356
Likes
583
  1. Input Opamp Change to OPA1556,this is due to part unified that we found it perform the same as OPA1612 in another project.
  2. add a optional 12V connector (not populated) for some people that need for power LEDs,etc.
  3. Buck cap change to 1500uF/80V/Nichicon due to 1800uF/63V/Rubycon not able to purchase.
So it is more of a side grade?
What is the rationale behind the change of the inductors? 2321 versus 2251, you left that out?
 

amper42

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 21, 2020
Messages
1,661
Likes
2,452
The cost of the TI OPA1656 is less than half of the OPA1612 cost. Yet, it does a great job too.

1656.png
1612.png
 
Last edited:

activewire

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
6
Likes
7
  1. Input Opamp Change to OPA1556
Think you meant OPA1656?

Am I correct to believe that when I modify the RevB modules (now awaiting my order of 6 modules) for single end input, I must use the exact same op amp as the one already mounted (meaning OPA1656) or would it matter if these are not identical?
 

3eaudio

Active Member
Audio Company
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
137
Likes
294
Think you meant OPA1656?

Am I correct to believe that when I modify the RevB modules (now awaiting my order of 6 modules) for single end input, I must use the exact same op amp as the one already mounted (meaning OPA1656) or would it matter if these are not identical?
yes,OPA1656.
you can use same or similar performance one, our purpose use OPA1656 is to maintain the same performance with OPA1612 in AMP board itself.
 

dpuopolo

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2018
Messages
64
Likes
27
Running my new mono cards on a ten foot #10 stranded cord from the 50 volt 10 amp power supply. Two feet from the cards the cord splits into two #16 cords which plug into the two mono amp cards. I'm running a WiiM Pro Plus into the amp and Emotiva B1+ speakers. The sound is wide and deep - far more so than with their stereo amp card.
A notable improvement in both left/right top/bottom and Forward/ backwards.
 
Top Bottom