Couldn't help un-noticing but you made the naming a bit similar to Topping - PA5 & PA7.
Then again, Topping always had the unfortunate disadvantage to have their brand sound like, well, a pizza topping - "topped off" with seriously questionable support decisions like with the infamously faulty PA5 (MK1) amplifier. Unlike 3e Audio, which sounds technical and professional, and a reputation that has yet to be built for finished end-user products.
Don't underestimate these superficially meaningless naming and branding differences - they are anything but when it comes to marketing and building an international reputation. The average international customer who doesn't know these newer brands doesn't associate anything with them, but goes by sound of name and first impression, and then goes reading some reviews. A simple marketing fact.
Let me try and demonstrate possible future brand strength, if 3e does it right and capitalises on their design that is superior in the budget sector:
I'm exaggerating for effect and meme's sake, but really that's my current opinion after months of researching what I should possibly buy, with DIY always being an option. My budget is notoriously tight, and I'm a bit of an anal person when it comes to the best options per money. Which is exactly why I'd like to see the frankly superb 3e boards in a finished product done right, and sold with honest advertising. 200-300 international moneys (€/$/£) is what I'm willing to spend on a really good 3255 amplifier, if it does everything right.
The alternative is "biting the sour apple" in terms of money, and paying 500-600 for a Hypex based power amplifier, which is arguably superior in all regards and easily "budget endgame" for my personal needs, and I'm sure for that of many others too. This overall market segment certainly is highly competitive and not easy to navigate for a relatively young company. Once again, I really wish 3e all the best and big success. But achieving that will be a matter of high level company decisions.