the PA5 to me, has no reason to exist
you're better off with a RA3 and having a pocketing the difference
to me Topping has built a better mousetrap with the PA5.. unfortunately the mousetrap everyone is building is based on the Fosi V3... is the PA5 twice better than a V3???
at least Fosi doesnt use potting!
let us put aside the numbers... i dont like TRS, I dont like separate psus when it doesnt even have the neat trick Fosi has where you can mix and match psus to taste.
and yes the big differentiator is that the remote makes a huge difference in day to day usuability with vol and especially, switching from XLR to rca.
Plus I like the rack aesthetic and we have as yet not seen what Topping want to do with the type-c port on the back in regards to software control.
Also the PA5 will always have the stench of whatever they did first time round.
you're better off with a RA3 and having a pocketing the difference
to me Topping has built a better mousetrap with the PA5.. unfortunately the mousetrap everyone is building is based on the Fosi V3... is the PA5 twice better than a V3???
at least Fosi doesnt use potting!
let us put aside the numbers... i dont like TRS, I dont like separate psus when it doesnt even have the neat trick Fosi has where you can mix and match psus to taste.
and yes the big differentiator is that the remote makes a huge difference in day to day usuability with vol and especially, switching from XLR to rca.
Plus I like the rack aesthetic and we have as yet not seen what Topping want to do with the type-c port on the back in regards to software control.
Also the PA5 will always have the stench of whatever they did first time round.