Distortion (except for 1% number) not shown, duration not shown. Pointless.
180W bridged into 4 ohms which makes sense as in 8 ohm the power is 100W
Distortion (except for 1% number) not shown, duration not shown. Pointless.
180W bridged into 4 ohms which makes sense as in 8 ohm the power is 100W
Find one for $1600
Then buy a preamp
Distortion not shown, duration not shown
He also did max and peak bridged 4 OhmHe measured 8 ohm bridged.
View attachment 202540
Do not forget that bridged mode every output sees half load impedance.
8 = 4, 4 = 2 seen in bridged mode.
What do you mean? it says right there 1% distortion. I don't know the duration but no amp run at full power continuously, why is it pointless? as for peak power, the duration of the burst is defined in the CEA-20006/490 standard no?Distortion not shown, duration not shown. Pointless.
A buffered pot will not give 3 inputsI mean even with the price differential. Topping has a habit of slapping an unbuffered pot right on the input to improve SNR, you could pick one off those balanced passive preamps for $30 off eBay and have a similar setup, not to mention you could use a DACs with remote controlled output and a remote.
1%Distortion (except for 1% number) not shown, duration not shown. Pointless.
You will pay >50% more and still need a preamp.I mean even with the price differential, I’d happily pay 30% - 40% more. Topping has a habit of slapping an unbuffered pot right on the input to improve SNR, you could pick one off those balanced passive preamps for $30 off eBay and have a similar setup, not to mention you could use a DACs with remote controlled output and a remote.
A buffered pot will not give 3 inputs
Used AHB2 $2500
Preamp, min $500, likely not as good
$3000
Still need a source
Topping
$1600 plus top of the line DAC
$2500
2500/1600 ~ 56% more, usedExactly. 30% more for a reputable brand with a good resale value is well worth it, not to mention you also get more power.
Only I would argue that a bridged amplifier that can't handle a four ohm load is certainly not one of the world's finest amps. Rather is it compromised. That, my friend, seems incredibly obvious. To me.my next mains speaker is going to be a Revel F228Be. That's 8 ohms and 90dB sensitive. I'd get that and run an LA90 bridged per speaker. So you have one of the finest speakers in the world, and the world's finest amplifier works perfectly with it? Okay, great. Weird you couldn't figure out such an incredibly obvious use case.
2500
????Only I would argue that a bridged amplifier that can't handle a four ohm load is certainly not one of the world's finest amps. Rather is it compromised. That, my friend, seems incredibly obvious. To me.
Is bridging a bridged AB amplifier even possible? I thought you could only combine 4 or more modules in a parallel (if current-limited), or parallel/bridge configuration, but not bridged bridge (unless the goal is to create a smoke machine… ).Switching to mono creates a bridged, bridge amplifier.
The standard for a commercial product could be different. Reliability under harsh conditions. I am talking about touring--portable applications. For installed sound, where the device stays put, that's not a factor. Then, you are looking (probably) for bang for the buck in the wattage category. Ease of installation and service, if required.I would think a commercial product would be held to a higher standard.
These are often permanent installations.The standard for a commercial product could be different. Reliability under harsh conditions. I am talking about touring--portable applications. For installed sound, where the device stays put, that's not a factor. Then, you are looking (probably) for bang for the buck in the wattage category. Ease of installation and service, if required.