antcollinet
Grand Contributor
...I rarely hear any difference between my cd transport and my fanless HTPC ....
There is a good reason for this...
...I rarely hear any difference between my cd transport and my fanless HTPC ....
Use the one that is most convenient to you. If you tend to play above 192khz files I2S is your only choice ( if you don`t want usb).Thanks, I thought that connecting by I2s would be the best connection.
You could use AES but what about Coaxial? Even with optical the performance is still supurb. No reason to spend more money to avoid using it.Thanks, I thought that connecting by I2s would be the best connection. I think the optical output is limited in bandwith. The Shanling can also stream high resolution.
I allready use the USB input on the topping. Maybe the AES is the way to go?
@amirm is backed up for several months. So even if someone sent him one; probably we wouldn't see a review this year.I guess I could use a usb switch, for connecting multiple source to 1 usb input on my dac. Is only a little inconvenient. But for playing CD's i need to get up and load the CD so not a big problem also switching the usb switch. I've almost convinced my self in buying the Shanling but I would like to see some more reviews first. Would be great if some one sends one to Amirm or not
.
Yea so coax / aes is the same interface it loos like. Use that as it should be fine. Typically coax is cleaner than optical since it won't have the signal mismatch issues.Then I will definitely not wait for Amir.
About the inputs
ET3 supports multiple interfaces for digital output, especially for USB output! USB output up to 768kHz/32bit, DSD512; I² output up to 768kHz/32bit, DSD512; Coaxial / Optical / AES output up to PCM 192 kHz / 32bit, DSD 64. *Please refer to the manual for the I² S interface wire sequence.
As I've just pointed out in another thread. Unless the mismatch causes bit errors then Toslink will be audibly identical to coax with the added advantage of galvanic isolation/elimination of ground currents.Yea so coax / aes is the same interface it loos like. Use that as it should be fine. Typically coax is cleaner than optical since it won't have the signal mismatch issues.
Yes, if there are bit errors. I have experienced them before with Optical. Clicks & Crackles are exactly what happens IF there is an issue. Otherwise it is fine. I have various devices running with optical for years with no issues.... then I have had a few that don't work right.As I've just pointed out in another thread. Unless the mismatch causes bit errors then Toslink will be audibly identical to coax with the added advantage of galvanic isolation/elimination of ground currents.
And you will know if you have bit errors. Clicks and crackles tend to stand out quite a lot.
Of course there is. Use it with a poorly matched cable, or with significant ground currents, or other noise, or too long a cable. Reflections and losses apply to the electrical spdif just as it does to optical.Yes, if there are bit errors. I have experienced them before with Optical. Clicks & Crackles are exactly what happens IF there is an issue. Otherwise it is fine. I have various devices running with optical for years with no issues.... then I have had a few that don't work right.
I am just saying that in general if you can use Coax instead; then I view it as better because there is no chance for those errors.
Electronics don't have reflections and unless the cable is very long, it wouldn't be an issue. These are desktop DAC/Amp setups. So there would be no reason to have a 10Ft+ long cable. If that is the case; then use optical and hope for the best.Of course there is. Use it with a poorly matched cable, or with significant ground currents, or other noise, or too long a cable. Reflections and losses apply to the electrical spdif just as it does to optical.
Electronics don't have reflections
Bluetooth already has transparency, you won’t hear anything better than CD quality.Dont get me wrong- a world where every DAC has a wifi chip and I can go lossless/ hi res from streaming app direct to DAC would be great. But that isnt where the market is going, for whatever reason. The point of bluetooth in DACs isnt for quality- its for pure convenience.
Does Wifi 6 enable the transfer of music without, say Airplay or Chromecast protocols? Im not familiar with the tech
On the newer codecs, maybe (LDAC for eg) , but some of the lower res codecs are pretty poor. In the context of a TV to a DAc you think both will have LDAC? I doubt it but might be wrongBluetooth already has transparency, you won’t hear anything better than CD quality.
None of the TVs has LDAC, also none of the programs are in cd quality If m not wrong. For tvs I guess the best way is to have arc on the dacsOn the newer codecs, maybe (LDAC for eg) , but some of the lower res codecs are pretty poor. In the context of a TV to a DAc you think both will have LDAC? I doubt it but might be wrong
Modern Sony TVs may support LDAC, as it is Sony's codec. At least my Sony Bluray player supports LDAC.None of the TVs has LDAC, also none of the programs are in cd quality If m not wrong. For tvs I guess the best way is to have arc on the dacs