"I suspect he is aligning himself with those who follow the anti-data paradigm, which are many in the ranks willing to spend what he charges, thinking that the measurement-based reviewers are sufficiently marginalized among his prospective clientele as to inoculate him from any real consequences. He probably thinks that delivering his smack-down will raise his status in the crowd he cares about. Let’s hope he is wrong."I suspect he is aligning himself with those who follow the anti-data paradigm, which are many in the ranks willing to spend what he charges, thinking that the measurement-based reviewers are sufficiently marginalized among his prospective clientele as to inoculate him from any real consequences. He probably thinks that delivering his smack-down will raise his status in the crowd he cares about. Let’s hope he is wrong.
He could have held that position with some dignity, however, with a third potential response: “a couple of online reviewers believe that my award-winning speakers don’t measure up. We think they are too busy with graphs and not using their ears. Why don’t you schedule an audition with a Teknot dealer and listen for yourself?” That would avoid making any claims about the accuracy of the measurements, and instead shift it to the importance of the measurements, which can be spun in all sorts of subjective ways.
He would still have his controversy, but without the legal ramifications.
Rick “not agreeing with that position, of course” Denney
i think you're giving eric way too much credit. i don't think eric is trying to align himself with any ideology regarding listening vs measuring. this has nothing to do with pro-data vs anti-data audiophiles. this is just someone lashing out. if he really had strong feelings about measuring and/or listening, his comments would be directed there, but they're not; they're all over the map.
and besides, i'm pretty sure that folks who like his speakers run the gamut, regarding their feelings about measurements.
ymmv,
doug s.