maybe based on looking at graphs and instantly says pfff...Why? Based on what?
maybe based on looking at graphs and instantly says pfff...Why? Based on what?
I’ll stop talking in this thread since there’s much better informed folks in the other.
I get your point and understand the frustration. But Musictubes is a new member and we need to give him some wiggle room and time to figure this place out. Just me thinking out loud and I’m not leaning into you in particular. A general observation for the group here. Let’s give him the benefit of the doubt please.You know the other thread is in this same forum right? With the same forum members?
Not to make this into a thread about a thread (so meta!) but I actually took Musictubes to be making a self deprecating comment, deferring to the commenters in the other thread over himself.You know the other thread is in this same forum right? With the same forum members?
Really applaud how @amirm has handled this. The way manufacturers behave as if they’ve done nothing wrong and then take zero accountability when proven wrong is everywhere. Wanting to help with other reviewers legal funds is above what most would do.
Post quote deleted by Moderation
Sorry to disagree, but I think my original post is quite appropriate material for a forum. If the forum moderators disagree, they can so indicate by closing my account now.Don't forget the "no politics" rule you signed up to when you joined.
It really doesn't matter if it is appropriate for a forum or not - or what your opinion is. This forum has the rule for a reason, and you agreed to it. Ignoring it is the quickest way to get your posts deleted (if the mods see it). My post was simply intended as a friendly heads up so you can avoid falling foul of the trap.Sorry to disagree, but I think my original post is quite appropriate material for a forum. If the forum moderators disagree, they can so indicate by closing my account now.
No, it's just the opposite.The essence of flat-earth thinking is sticking to some evidence and denying what the majority sees with their own eyes.
Okay. Maybe we can explore this a little bit. What suggested to you that my original post had run afoul of the rule? I'll tell you that my intent was not to inject politics per se, but rather to highlight a connection between American politics in general and this saga in the audio world in particular. Is that out of bounds? Really? How do you draw this boundary?It really doesn't matter if it is appropriate for a forum or not - or what your opinion is. This forum has the rule for a reason, and you agreed to it. Ignoring it is the quickest way to get your posts deleted (if the mods see it). My post was simply intended as a friendly heads up so you can avoid falling foul of the trap.
No skin off my nose either way.
Let me try.No, it's just the opposite.
I feel no need to "explore" it - like I say, no skin off my nose either way. Just know I've had posts deleted containing far less obviously political references.Okay. Maybe we can explore this a little bit. What suggested to you that my original post had run afoul of the rule? I'll tell you that my intent was not to inject politics per se, but rather to highlight a connection between American politics in general and this saga in the audio world in particular. Is that out of bounds? Really? How do you draw this boundary?
Request granted Sir. Account closed.Sorry to disagree, but I think my original post is quite appropriate material for a forum. If the forum moderators disagree, they can so indicate by closing my account now.
Thank you, that's more like it.Let me try.
The essence of flat earth thinking is denying ALL the factual and science based evidence, and embracing only what they see with their own eyes - and even bending that to fit their dogma.
You seem to be repeating the same claims he makes on his website and in his videos and interviews, and like him, you're not providing evidence for the claims.
Is the mass really lower when you add up the the mass from six tweeters? Does the alleged lower mass really improve impulse response? Does impulse response even need to be improved? If so, in what way? Where are the measurements? And is it audible? Do the measurements show any improvements in ringing compared to other speakers?
You say a 7" midrange would beam pretty badly. First, I don't consider a 7" driver to be a midrange. Too big. It's a woofer. Second, yes, it would beam, but so does the Tekton array! It beams dramatically, in fact. Look at the Stereophile off-axis response plots for evidence.
Why? The 'motor' of any driver (tweeter or woofer) is designed to move the mass it needs to move, at the speed it needs to move it for the required maximum frequency of the driver in order to achieve a flat response. There is no reason to expect this to be over dimensioned in a tweeter compared with a mid range speaker.I think it's about driver mass, in relation to magnet's surface area on the coil, if I had to guess. Let's say that total driver mass is identical, I'm pretty sure six magnets and coils can move it with more control than a single coil.
Why? The 'motor' of any driver (tweeter or woofer) is designed to move the mass it needs to move, at the speed it needs to move it for the required maximum frequency of the driver in order to achieve a flat response. There is no reason to expect this to be over dimensioned in a tweeter compared with a mid range speaker.