In that case I would recommend the lowest sensitivity setting.… The Holo May has no volume control.
Well then, the LA4 had three volume levelsIn that case I would recommend the lowest sensitivity setting.
Rick “turn that #%^}#! thing down!” Denney
I suggest we get back on topic which is regarding the AHB2 and how to get the most from it.www.addictedtoaudio.com.au/blogs/how-to/how-to-pick-the-best-filter-setting-for-your-dac
Above is a link that explains how different filters measure and sound, on an ASR fav DAC. While some may claim these differences are inaudible, in my experience with DACs that I’ve owned that allow one to select various filters, one could easily hear differences in real time a-b comparisons. Many highly respected engineers such as Dr Johnson, E Meitner will tell you they measure and listen. These are folks that have also made huge contributions not just advancing consumer products, but also in the pro recording arena designing and manufacturing some of the best sounding PCM and DSD A to D and D to A equipment, used by many of the best studios to produce some of the best recordings ever.
it does not fully mute the opposite side, no.L/R balance, should it fully swing from one side to the other? I am not noticing much of a difference when balancing left or right.
Received my LA4 yesterday. I know this is a AHB2 thread, but you folks seem pretty knowledgeable on LA4/HPA4 as well. So, question... L/R balance, should it fully swing from one side to the other? I am not noticing much of a difference when balancing left or right.
Let me repeat. I wrote that dacs that measure well may not sound the same. Never wrote that they measured the same. Go back and reread my post. Filters sound and measure different. Meitner uses an interesting scheme that in real time changes the filter. I like it, you may not feel it’s important. Most great engineers will tell you they start with measurement, but always listen and compare to a reference. Many times in the history of this hobby we’ve learned that what we thought were complete measurements for defining how a product would sound were in fact not complete. But either way, this thread is about the AHB2.You never provided after having been asked several times by multiple posters to present evidence for your claim „that DACs sound“ different although they are SOTA and measure the same. Therefore your argument is fundamentally flawed.
You most likely perceive a difference due to your biases. You can proof the correctness by excluding those biases by an ABX.
Same difference. Still no proof. Just anecdote.Let me repeat. I wrote that dacs that measure well may not sound the same. Never wrote that they measured the same. Go back and reread my post. Filters sound and measure different. Meitner uses an interesting scheme that in real time changes the filter. I like it, you may not feel it’s important. Most great engineers will tell you they start with measurement, but always listen and compare to a reference. Many times in the history of this hobby we’ve learned that what we thought were complete measurements for defining how a product would sound were in fact not complete. But either way, this thread is about the AHB2.
I do wonder how Beethoven and Bach ever made any music without scientific instrumentation to tell them whether their musical instruments were 'correctly' tuned.Same difference. Still no proof. Just anecdote.
Fair enough. Let’s leave it at that.
I do wonder how Beethoven and Bach ever made any music without scientific instrumentation to tell them whether their musical instruments were 'correctly' tuned.
Don’t twist the facts.I do wonder how Beethoven and Bach ever made any music without scientific instrumentation to tell them whether their musical instruments were 'correctly' tuned.
Still Benchmark have found that both measurement and listening are necessary.
Listening vs. Measuring
At Benchmark, listening is the final exam that determines if a design passes from engineering to production. When all of the measurements show that a product is working flawlessly, we spend time listening for issues that may not have shown up on the test station. If we hear something, we go back...benchmarkmedia.com
This section is interesting.
AUDIBLE ARTIFACTS THAT ELUDE TRADITIONAL MEASUREMENTS
Don’t twist the facts.
There are no proofs, science nor facts; only what one decides to believeDon’t twist the facts.
Nobody here says not to listen. But if you claim audible differences which are not measurable than proof it with ABX listening.
However still more anecdote and no proof.
What did you think a forum with Science in the title would be about if not about facts ?