• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Fosi Audio V3 Mono Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 13 1.8%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 23 3.2%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 139 19.4%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 540 75.5%

  • Total voters
    715
They've put the additional opamp mostly to provide more gain, if you need it, but you can bypass it. The fact is the XLR input has 9db more SINAD performance.
You don't need active converters. Hypex amps work balanced internally, and they advise users to use XLR adapters for unbalanced signal, which works well and has no penalty.

V3 amp has 20db gain for XLR, which is more than adequate for most 2V sources and volume requirements at home. RCA input has 25db and 31db with the gain switch. If you need that gain, ok, but my point is you may get better sound quality with XLR 20db gain, with less noise, and you don't need to attenuate that much for the same volume. Both opamp gain and source attenuation intruduce noise, which we can bypass by using XLR input.
But you agree that you will lose output, correct?

Hypex advises adapters for amps that have only xlr input. As I said, it's a good workaround.

These amp designers would all love to get the same sinad on rca as they get on xlr. But let's pretend they're all incompetent, because they should just hotglue a $2 adapter into the back and their amps would sound and measure better.

How come Amir doesn't recommend this, he's all about sinad? Yet I don't see him suggesting you forego the rca input and get free extra performance with a $2 adapter. It would be one hell of a hack.
 
How come Amir doesn't recommend this, he's all about sinad? Yet I don't see him suggesting you forego the rca input and get free extra performance with a $2 adapter. It would be one hell of a hack.
Getting the most out of a given device isn't really Amir's forte.

If there's an RCA out on the DAC and a matching RCA in on the Amp, then that's what he's gonna use, even though connecting RCA to the XLR in has the potential of drastically higher CMRR resulting in less interference.
 
This is indeed a well done FAQ.

The answer to: "How are you synchronizing the TPA3255 oscillator between the monoblocks in order to avoid Class D "Beat Tones" ? " ,
should have been a simple and honest: "We don't.".

This is another reason why the Fosi V3 Stereo PFFB will be a superior value proposition for the average consumer in comparison to the Fosi V3 Mono.
Yes, what does this mean for the average listener? It was a question I hadn’t heard asked before. Does using either one or two power supplies have any bearing on the answer?
 
But you agree that you will lose output, correct?

Hypex advises adapters for amps that have only xlr input. As I said, it's a good workaround.

These amp designers would all love to get the same sinad on rca as they get on xlr. But let's pretend they're all incompetent, because they should just hotglue a $2 adapter into the back and their amps would sound and measure better.

How come Amir doesn't recommend this, he's all about sinad? Yet I don't see him suggesting you forego the rca input and get free extra performance with a $2 adapter. It would be one hell of a hack.

Is there even a benefit of using RCA to XLR connection?
Will RCA to XLR cable carry or convert unbalanced to balanced signal!!!

It's more of a convenience, only.
 
I remembered seeing this a while back...
But you agree that you will lose output, correct?

Hypex advises adapters for amps that have only xlr input. As I said, it's a good workaround.

These amp designers would all love to get the same sinad on rca as they get on xlr. But let's pretend they're all incompetent, because they should just hotglue a $2 adapter into the back and their amps would sound and measure better.

How come Amir doesn't recommend this, he's all about sinad? Yet I don't see him suggesting you forego the rca input and get free extra performance with a $2 adapter. It would be one hell of a hack.

I think these refer to the issue relating to gain. So Fosi are covering all bases here. So yes you will lose output, or need higher voltage input, either from the source or that additional op amp.
 
I had never used kickstart, today I created an account to support this project.
Normally I don't like to put money forward but I want to help Fosi as a company and its policy of listening to users and collaborating.

Just a question. When creating the account I was not asked anything about the delivery address, how does it work?
 
I had never used kickstart, today I created an account to support this project.
Normally I don't like to put money forward but I want to help Fosi as a company and its policy of listening to users and collaborating.

Just a question. When creating the account I was not asked anything about the delivery address, how does it work?
If a crowdfund is successfully funded, then they will reach out to backers to confirm final delivery address as well as any additional add-ons desired (typically with something like BackerKit).

-Ed
 
The pledge amount jumped 7k in the last 7 hours. With more than 30 days to go, I'd say we'll hit the 300k milestone with ease.

Not that I care much about receiving the reward, but for those who do.
 
The pledge amount jumped 7k in the last 7 hours. With more than 30 days to go, I'd say we'll hit the 300k milestone with ease.

Agreed!
 
Just the fronts and the center speaker

Surrounds are fine with the internal amp
I am planning the same setup with my Dennom AVR3400. I anticipate significant improvement in all 7 Channels with the heavy lifting being done by the monoblocks. I agree the recievers internal amp section won't even come close to breaking a sweat powering the surrounds.
 
I'm not sure what the benefit is of just one op amp.
Except on the single to balanced conversion.
This is presuming one per amp, and not one per order.
Anyone wanting to try these on the balanced inputs would need therefore to buy another 2 or 3!
Some confusion here @Fosi Audio
Thank you all for your support; we are indeed close to reaching our 300K goal. We have heard your voices and will explore new options for the stretch goal.:)
 
I am planning the same setup with my Dennom AVR3400. I anticipate significant improvement in all 7 Channels with the heavy lifting being done by the monoblocks. I agree the recievers internal amp section won't even come close to breaking a sweat powering the surrounds.
What is the power of your surrounds?
 
Could be fun to try the amps with a preamp with a streamer

Does fosi audio plna on making a preamp that matches the power amps ? (regardless if it has a built in streamer or not)

 
Could be fun to try the amps with a preamp with a streamer

Does fosi audio plna on making a preamp that matches the power amps ? (regardless if it has a built in streamer or not)

Yes, we're making one with XLR balanced and RCA output.
 
What is the power of your surrounds?
They are infinity r152 rated to 125W 6ohm 87 db sensitivity. My dennon is rated at 105wpc(2 channels driven) in a 7.2 setup the side and rear channels have very little happening compared to the fronts and center. With the moniblocks handling the three front speakers, the receiver should have oodles of headroom powering four surrounds, even at painful unsustainably loud levels.
 
Thank you all for your support; we are indeed close to reaching our 300K goal. We have heard your voices and will explore new options for the stretch goal.:)
If I may make a request, if possible could you include 2 OpAmp chips rather than just 1? Thank you.
 
Yes, we're making one with XLR balanced and RCA output.

Assuming you're referring to the ZD3? Anxiously awaiting news/updates on this. Have a couple potential use cases for it, including pairing it with dual V3M's.

@Fosi Audio any hint on when we might hear more about it?
 
Back
Top Bottom