• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Fosi Audio V3 Mono Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 12 1.9%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 19 3.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 122 19.5%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 473 75.6%

  • Total voters
    626
Why not use RCA to XLR adaptors instead of RCA input for better performance?
RCA inputs have additional and innecessary gain as well as op-amp 'converter'.
XLR has enough input impedance to drive single-ended voltage.
Why do you think they put that op-amp there, to waste money?

You will lose quite a bit of output if you just feed se into the xlr. It will work, but it won't be better. You would need an active rca-xlr converter instead of an adapter. The 'innessary' gain and op-amp ARE your active converter, before they feed it into the balanced circuit of the amp.

So no, don't do that. It's a workaround for an amp that only had xlr in, it's not an improvement over Fosi's design.
 
This is indeed a well done FAQ.

The answer to: "How are you synchronizing the TPA3255 oscillator between the monoblocks in order to avoid Class D "Beat Tones" ? " ,
should have been a simple and honest: "We don't.".

This is another reason why the Fosi V3 Stereo PFFB will be a superior value proposition for the average consumer in comparison to the Fosi V3 Mono.
 
Last edited:
Anyone willing to bet we're NOT going to hit the $300K mark by the deadline?

With 36 days left? :)
Wow! ... Take a free day, go to a park and enjoy some beautiful outland.
 
Why do you think they put that op-amp there, to waste money?
You will lose quite a bit of output if you just feed se into the xlr. It will work, but it won't be better. You would need an active rca-xlr converter instead of an adapter. The 'innessary' gain and op-amp ARE your active converter, before they feed it into the balanced circuit of the amp.
They've put the additional opamp mostly to provide more gain, if you need it, but you can bypass it. The fact is the XLR input has 9db more SINAD performance.
You don't need active converters. Hypex amps work balanced internally, and they advise users to use XLR adapters for unbalanced signal, which works well and has no penalty.

V3 amp has 20db gain for XLR, which is more than adequate for most 2V sources and volume requirements at home. RCA input has 25db and 31db with the gain switch. If you need that gain, ok, but my point is you may get better sound quality with XLR 20db gain, with less noise, and you don't need to attenuate that much for the same volume. Both opamp gain and source attenuation intruduce noise, which we can bypass by using XLR input.
 
They've put the additional opamp mostly to provide more gain, if you need it, but you can bypass it. The fact is the XLR input has 9db more SINAD performance.
You don't need active converters. Hypex amps work balanced internally, and they advise users to use XLR adapters for unbalanced signal, which works well and has no penalty.

V3 amp has 20db gain for XLR, which is more than adequate for most 2V sources and volume requirements at home. RCA input has 25db and 31db with the gain switch. If you need that gain, ok, but my point is you may get better sound quality with XLR 20db gain, with less noise, and you don't need to attenuate that much for the same volume. Both opamp gain and source attenuation intruduce noise, which we can bypass by using XLR input.
But the point is that at those synad levels it is already practically impossible to hear anything.... Sinad is not an infinite parameter of sound quality, a Sinad of 140 does not indicate a "sound quality" better than 100.
Once distortion is so low and noise cannot be heard from the listening position in quieter musical passages, further increasing Sinad provides no benefit to sound quality.
 
They've put the additional opamp mostly to provide more gain, if you need it, but you can bypass it. The fact is the XLR input has 9db more SINAD performance.
You don't need active converters. Hypex amps work balanced internally, and they advise users to use XLR adapters for unbalanced signal, which works well and has no penalty.

V3 amp has 20db gain for XLR, which is more than adequate for most 2V sources and volume requirements at home. RCA input has 25db and 31db with the gain switch. If you need that gain, ok, but my point is you may get better sound quality with XLR 20db gain, with less noise, and you don't need to attenuate that much for the same volume. Both opamp gain and source attenuation intruduce noise, which we can bypass by using XLR input.
I think this is a good point, but for me it just ticks an additional feature box. 20db and then options of 25db and 31db should anyone need it.
I think Fosi were criticized by a commentator for not having high enough gain with another model so they have simply covered all bases.

The Sylph Audio models have sometimes 14db gain into balanced and my understanding that this with the goal of better Sinad / measurements.

I'm interested that Fosi have hit 100 or 101 Sinad with higher gain.

I'll be using balanced ... and thankful the volume is not deafening with the volume control at the 9.00 o'clock position.
 
They've put the additional opamp mostly to provide more gain, if you need it, but you can bypass it. The fact is the XLR input has 9db more SINAD performance.
You don't need active converters. Hypex amps work balanced internally, and they advise users to use XLR adapters for unbalanced signal, which works well and has no penalty.

V3 amp has 20db gain for XLR, which is more than adequate for most 2V sources and volume requirements at home. RCA input has 25db and 31db with the gain switch. If you need that gain, ok, but my point is you may get better sound quality with XLR 20db gain, with less noise, and you don't need to attenuate that much for the same volume. Both opamp gain and source attenuation intruduce noise, which we can bypass by using XLR input.
But you agree that you will lose output, correct?

Hypex advises adapters for amps that have only xlr input. As I said, it's a good workaround.

These amp designers would all love to get the same sinad on rca as they get on xlr. But let's pretend they're all incompetent, because they should just hotglue a $2 adapter into the back and their amps would sound and measure better.

How come Amir doesn't recommend this, he's all about sinad? Yet I don't see him suggesting you forego the rca input and get free extra performance with a $2 adapter. It would be one hell of a hack.
 
How come Amir doesn't recommend this, he's all about sinad? Yet I don't see him suggesting you forego the rca input and get free extra performance with a $2 adapter. It would be one hell of a hack.
Getting the most out of a given device isn't really Amir's forte.

If there's an RCA out on the DAC and a matching RCA in on the Amp, then that's what he's gonna use, even though connecting RCA to the XLR in has the potential of drastically higher CMRR resulting in less interference.
 
This is indeed a well done FAQ.

The answer to: "How are you synchronizing the TPA3255 oscillator between the monoblocks in order to avoid Class D "Beat Tones" ? " ,
should have been a simple and honest: "We don't.".

This is another reason why the Fosi V3 Stereo PFFB will be a superior value proposition for the average consumer in comparison to the Fosi V3 Mono.
Yes, what does this mean for the average listener? It was a question I hadn’t heard asked before. Does using either one or two power supplies have any bearing on the answer?
 
But you agree that you will lose output, correct?

Hypex advises adapters for amps that have only xlr input. As I said, it's a good workaround.

These amp designers would all love to get the same sinad on rca as they get on xlr. But let's pretend they're all incompetent, because they should just hotglue a $2 adapter into the back and their amps would sound and measure better.

How come Amir doesn't recommend this, he's all about sinad? Yet I don't see him suggesting you forego the rca input and get free extra performance with a $2 adapter. It would be one hell of a hack.

Is there even a benefit of using RCA to XLR connection?
Will RCA to XLR cable carry or convert unbalanced to balanced signal!!!

It's more of a convenience, only.
 
I remembered seeing this a while back...
But you agree that you will lose output, correct?

Hypex advises adapters for amps that have only xlr input. As I said, it's a good workaround.

These amp designers would all love to get the same sinad on rca as they get on xlr. But let's pretend they're all incompetent, because they should just hotglue a $2 adapter into the back and their amps would sound and measure better.

How come Amir doesn't recommend this, he's all about sinad? Yet I don't see him suggesting you forego the rca input and get free extra performance with a $2 adapter. It would be one hell of a hack.

I think these refer to the issue relating to gain. So Fosi are covering all bases here. So yes you will lose output, or need higher voltage input, either from the source or that additional op amp.
 
I had never used kickstart, today I created an account to support this project.
Normally I don't like to put money forward but I want to help Fosi as a company and its policy of listening to users and collaborating.

Just a question. When creating the account I was not asked anything about the delivery address, how does it work?
 
I had never used kickstart, today I created an account to support this project.
Normally I don't like to put money forward but I want to help Fosi as a company and its policy of listening to users and collaborating.

Just a question. When creating the account I was not asked anything about the delivery address, how does it work?
If a crowdfund is successfully funded, then they will reach out to backers to confirm final delivery address as well as any additional add-ons desired (typically with something like BackerKit).

-Ed
 
The pledge amount jumped 7k in the last 7 hours. With more than 30 days to go, I'd say we'll hit the 300k milestone with ease.

Not that I care much about receiving the reward, but for those who do.
 
The pledge amount jumped 7k in the last 7 hours. With more than 30 days to go, I'd say we'll hit the 300k milestone with ease.

Agreed!
 
Just the fronts and the center speaker

Surrounds are fine with the internal amp
I am planning the same setup with my Dennom AVR3400. I anticipate significant improvement in all 7 Channels with the heavy lifting being done by the monoblocks. I agree the recievers internal amp section won't even come close to breaking a sweat powering the surrounds.
 
I'm not sure what the benefit is of just one op amp.
Except on the single to balanced conversion.
This is presuming one per amp, and not one per order.
Anyone wanting to try these on the balanced inputs would need therefore to buy another 2 or 3!
Some confusion here @Fosi Audio
Thank you all for your support; we are indeed close to reaching our 300K goal. We have heard your voices and will explore new options for the stretch goal.:)
 
I am planning the same setup with my Dennom AVR3400. I anticipate significant improvement in all 7 Channels with the heavy lifting being done by the monoblocks. I agree the recievers internal amp section won't even come close to breaking a sweat powering the surrounds.
What is the power of your surrounds?
 
Could be fun to try the amps with a preamp with a streamer

Does fosi audio plna on making a preamp that matches the power amps ? (regardless if it has a built in streamer or not)

 
Back
Top Bottom