• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

ENGL E820 Tube Poweramplifier 2x35 Measurements

peniku8

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
376
Likes
751
I unexpectedly got my hands on this interesting unit. It's a guitar amplifier, but it has no preamp so it should technically be a simple tube amp.
Since it has two channels it can technically be used as a stereo home audio amplifier. If that would make sense and how it compares to actual 'hifi' tube amplifiers is what the measurements shall reveal. I don't know the original price of the unit, but the date code indicates it has been built in 1983 and I see used units selling for 300-400€ here.

yQ0b5p4.jpg


The amp only has volume and presence controls. More on that later
The test setup consists of the amp being fed by my Topping EX5, a switchable load bank and the Cosmos ADC:

bde3apU.jpeg


The loadbank can be watercooled but that is only really necessary for PA amps, as even on 100W from my Hypex amp the thing gets barely warm to the touch.

The first measurement I took was to look at the RTA on a moderate-low output level of 1V:

dk0AX2d.jpg


We have mains hum, its harmonics and lots of noise, but we can kind of see what some people seem to desire in a tube amp: prominent 2nd order distortion.

Raising the level to 4V (2W) distorts the signal more and other harmonics come up:

66gImOU.jpg



Looking at the THD vs level plot we see the 2nd harmonic coming in early, dominating the spectrum until you reach the capabilities of the amp, where other order also come in:

pohKtP9.jpg


Best case THD+N is -40dB at around 1V, which is what the first RTA shows.
We can see we get the 35 Watt that the amp's naming would suggest. At 10% distortion that is, which is totally okay for a guitar amplifier, since this is desirable.

Dynamic range comes in at ~69dB.
I forgot to take that particular measurement, but we can also figure that out based on the THD vs level plot (look at THD+N 60dB from the maximum level and then add 60dB to that).

Here is best case IMD (remember that REW does not show the correct ENOB value, so ignore that):

Bpr5Tjg.jpg



Now there are other interesting aspects and drawbacks of a tube amplifier, namely output impedance. Let's have a look at frequency response for this:

YKa2Mfh.jpg


The amp has dedicated outputs for 8 Ohm and for 16 Ohm speakers. Since my loadbank only has a range from 1 to 8 Ohm, I had to settle for 8 Ohm to measure the 16R output.
Generator levels were not changed for these tests.
Here is the 8R@8R sweep with the presence control set to give as flat of a response as possible (the other tests were conducted with this as a baseline setting).

YQeVnka.jpg



...and the distortion for this sweep:

r2UZAsr.jpg



Here is the level change between the measurements, which we can use to derive output impedance of the amplifier:

rFwRvef.jpg


A 6dB reduction means the amp's output impedance equals the impedance of the load, which means Zout of the 8R output is 7-8 Ohm.
The output impedance of the 16R output is significantly higher as you can see by the greater loss in level. Feel free to do the calculations on it if you want the exact values.

Lastly, here is the effect of the "Presence" control:

u3XHLWR.jpg



Conclusion:
I thought the measurements were quite interesting, especially given that we're typically used to seeing measurements of audibly transparent devices here on ASR.
This amp would absolutely not be audibly transparent, but that is the whole appeal of tube amps, apart from the looks.
The unit got quite hot even in idle. The fan in the back constantly blew out warm air and after an hour I noticed it actually heated up my room by a bit.
I can recommend it as guitar amplifier and I think you would even be able to enjoy listening to music on it, if your speakers are insensitive enough to not reveal the noise floor *and* you don't listen so loud that it would go into significant distortion. Which is a very specific scenario, so obviously I can't really recommend it for general music listening at all :)

Cheers!
 

MaxwellsEq

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Messages
1,763
Likes
2,673
Thanks for the review. It's always interesting to see reviews outside the mainstream!
 

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
11,418
Likes
24,786
Thanks +1! :)

Not sure why you say it has "no preamp" -- I presume that those presence controls are not passive networks (???) but rather active Baxandall-type controls upstream of the power amp.
What is the output topology? Vacuum tube power amplifier section? I presume so (35 wpc) -- I'm curious what tubes and whether PP or SE. ultralinear (likely not? ;) ) triode, or pentode. Are you in a position to share a photo of its innards? :)
1712149143770.jpeg

Bizarrely (i.e., inexplicably), I have a rather similar gizmo (Peavey Classic 50/50) that found its way to me 15 or 20 years ago. push-pull parallel EL84 (rather a brute-force approach -- but maybe guitarists like the EL84 sound?) for nominally 50 wpc. Probably (???) quite similar topologically, though(?).
No good images handy, so I'll share three poor ones, for comparison. ;) Note that this amplifier has two "tone"(?) controls - Presence and Resonance.



The preamp and voltage amp (driver) tubes are in the front (bottom of image) -- 12AX7, if memory serves. The 2 x 4 vertically stacked EL84s (sort of sheathed under that angle-cut black sheetmetal cover) are barely visible (i.e., the sockets and the tips of the top quad) at the top in the image above.

1712149079938.jpeg
 
OP
peniku8

peniku8

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
376
Likes
751
Thanks +1! :)

Not sure why you say it has "no preamp" -- I presume that those presence controls are not passive networks (???) but rather active Baxandall-type controls upstream of the power amp.
What is the output topology? Vacuum tube power amplifier section? I presume so (35 wpc) -- I'm curious what tubes and whether PP or SE. ultralinear (likely not? ;) ) triode, or pentode. Are you in a position to share a photo of its innards? :)

It has no 'preamp' in the sense of guitar preamps, like the typical controls you'd expect from an all-in-one guitar 'head' like an ENGL Powerball with Gain (Distortion) control, a 3-band EQ, a channel switcher for a low- and a high-gain channel and eventually a spring reverb like what is build into a HiWatt amp I have... generally just stuff that makes the tone/character.
Examples of typical standalone guitar preamps would be the Kemper, AxeFX or a pedal board for example.

Here is a pic of the internals I found online, but it seems to be the E820/50:

pic_0507-geaendert2-jpg.248389
 

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
11,418
Likes
24,786
Thanks!
Looks like that amp, too, is push-pull parallel EL84 outputs. OPTs are kind of small relative to the Peavey -- not a critique, just a statement. ;)
 

KSTR

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
2,800
Likes
6,268
Location
Berlin, Germany
Schematic attached.
It's 4x EL84 per channel, simple fixed bias pentode push-pull mode in the classic power-amp scheme with long tailed pair phase splitter.
Presence control is non-typical, reducing global feedback pretty much generally, with a slight skew at higher frequencies . By this, output impedance and gain is affected quite a bit.
 

Attachments

  • E820.pdf
    99 KB · Views: 17

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
11,418
Likes
24,786
Schematic attached.
It's 4x EL84 per channel, simple fixed bias pentode push-pull mode in the classic power-amp scheme with long tailed pair phase splitter.
Presence control is non-typical, reducing global feedback pretty much generally, with a slight skew at higher frequencies . By this, output impedance and gain is affected quite a bit.
Outstanding! Thank you.
Now you've got me wondering about the 'contouring' in the Peavey amp. I think I've got the schematic for it... someplace...
EDIT: https://www.thetubestore.com/lib/thetubestore/schematics/Peavey/Peavey-Classic50-50-Schematic.pdf
yup, DF adjustments on the Peavey as well. I'd managed to forget after ca. 25 years. :facepalm:

Sorry @peniku8 for the semi-digression! :confused:
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom