LOL. they just don't have that come hither and ravish me look though.There's always the AARP mermaids.
a friend posted me the new air fryer as i have the actifry tefal . yeah a power conditioner for air fryer , blimey that's expensive finger linking roast chicken at $4.5k .Now there is a thought! You could in addition use the P12 as an air fryer as its fans would surely run full power to keep it cool under such a load!
Your wife will taste the lifted veil in the kitchen. Like a change from factory farms to free-range.a friend posted me the new air fryer as i have the actifry tefal . yeah a power conditioner for air fryer , blimey that's expensive finger linking roast chicken at $4.5k .
Welcome. Interesting your first two posts here are challenging the review. Do you have some data from PS Audio that shows it helps with those lower power components? it would seem like they would have an easier time cleaning up/ regulating power than a monster amp.I see. But, it is still possible that the power clean up by PS12 or 9801 improves the signal for the front components like phono stage and streamer/DAC which don't produce much power. Have you checked these possibilities?
I don't have any data but I often read that PS audio is better for front end components than amps. I definitely find that upper frequency distortions from my LuminX1/ Benchmark LA4 preamp is decreased with Torus RM20 power conditioner. My Benchmark amp sounds same with or without Torus.Welcome. Interesting your first two posts here are challenging the review. Do you have some data from PS Audio that shows it helps with those lower power components? it would seem like they would have an easier time cleaning up/ regulating power than a monster amp.
Get some data and report back.I don't have any data but I often read that PS audio is better for front end components than amps. I definitely find that upper frequency distortions from my LuminX1/ Benchmark LA4 preamp is decreased with Torus RM20 power conditioner. My Benchmark amp sounds same with or without Torus.
That is the problem. A/B testing is useless except for fairly large differences. If anyone has to really intently listen to tell a difference then you CAN NOT A/B test. Your brain will give you false testing results all the time. This is the one area where even many of our members do not realize just how hard it is to A/B test something with speakers, in a room if the items are fairly close in sound. If it takes real concentration and effort then you must do a blind test. Oh, and that does NOT mean closing your eyes while listening!Get some data and report back.
Yes in a perfect world that is the way to go. But even "at home" basic decent blind testing works and will amaze people at how much they can't hear once they have no clue what unit is playing. 99% walk away shocked as what they thought was so easy to hear vanished once they had no idea which DUT they were hearing.Do such testing under double blind conditions to keep internalized beliefs about specific pieces of equipment from clouding judgement.
PS Audio claims thatYes in a perfect world that is the way to go. But even "at home" basic decent blind testing works and will amaze people at how much they can't hear once they have no clue what unit is playing. 99% walk away shocked as what they thought was so easy to hear vanished once they had no idea which DUT they were hearing.