Bubblegamma
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2024
- Messages
- 19
- Likes
- 11
So you don’t have any research data on near field monitoring in mixing studios?You want me to do your homework?
So you don’t have any research data on near field monitoring in mixing studios?You want me to do your homework?
Go create a new thread and prove that with data. This is a review thread and not a generic argument thread.Well, if you had any experience in studio work, you would know for example that 200-400hz peaks and 1khz dips are quite common in studios when near field monitors are used
What research? That a colored speaker sounds right because there is a desk in there? If so, as I mentioned, that is your job to reference, not mine.So you don’t have any research data on near field monitoring in mixing studios?
Your world is full of folklore and myths some of you believe in. Sadly you don't believe in proper experimentation to figure out if any of them are valid. So we are left with laughable claims such as a desk reflection counteracting colored response of a speaker. Go create a new thread and prove this point instead of derailing a review thread.I’m waiting for data on near field monitoring in studios from you first
So you don’t have any research data on near field monitoring in mixing studios?
Yes i basic room it's common, cos it's not treated well a least for the bass dip, phase cancel with wall. and home studio sometime they are in corner on a desk so dips are biggerSo you don’t have any research data on near field monitoring in mixing studios?
I'm aware but maybe he's really saying that the speaker has to be equalized because he feels guilty about all of his lies and its a way of justifying them
Actually he was talking about Result6 not having any options of FR correction at all.
These PMC Result 6 have narrow dispersion in the high frequencies....Wide dispersion in high frequencies? Great as well, because when using a lot of treatment to fix the bass problems you inevitably overdamp the highs
Easiest block ever. Thanks .Since @amirm blocked me here after failing to provide any data to support his claims (very adult and 'scientific' approach), I created a new account
Yeah-yeah, right. Thats why the-best-ever-sounding Genelecs have switches for desk reflections compensation. As well as many other monitors. And no @nabuc , I'm not talking about SBIR issues. Please read carefully
with acoustically transparent desk or console, right?
Exactly, thank you. Thats what I was talking about. But Amir started to arguing that its not the case
So, I gave you a clear example of how PMC's kind of FR could actually be a benefit for my specific case. What's the problem with that? Am I pushing someone to buy these speakers? Or is it somehow better to have a 'non-flat' FR from a 'flat' speaker at listening position instead of the other way around?
Again, different rooms, different listening positions, different use cases. There's no one speaker that is perfect for every situation
You need to show evidence for your claim. we don't need to show evidence that someone's claim that's void of evidence is false.I think you mixed me up with Amir. He mentioned the research data first, not me
When will U.K. loudspeaker manufacturers enter the 20th Century, so very poor.
Keith
Or maybe you're seeing signs and omens as some very religious people do?but maybe he's really saying that the speaker has to be equalized because he feels guilty about all of his lies