• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

NAD C298 Stereo Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 3 1.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 32 11.1%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 140 48.4%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 114 39.4%

  • Total voters
    289
I use a C298 with a miniDSP SHD (with Roon and Dirac Live) in one of my systems.

Tough to complain...
I too have the C298 with MiniDSP SHD (with Dirac Live) and choose the C298 because of Purifi and the fact it has auto sense switch on and then switches itself off after several minutes of non-use, making it more user friendly than other Purifi amplifier designs.

I'm impressed with the NAD (and the MiniDSP).
 
I too have the C298 with MiniDSP SHD (with Dirac Live) and choose the C298 because of Purifi and the fact it has auto sense switch on and then switches itself off after several minutes of non-use, making it more user friendly than other Purifi amplifier designs.

I'm impressed with the NAD (and the MiniDSP).
@Aventador_SVJ Can I ask is it easy enough to set up Dirac live on the mini DSP please? I am not very IT literate.
 
Thank you for your reassurance, however I have previously run through the manual and I found it all a bit confusing, also I don’t recall any mention of Dirac.

Perhaps there are YouTube video which might take me through the process step by step?
 
Last edited:
I use a C298 with a miniDSP SHD (with Roon and Dirac Live) in one of my systems.

Tough to complain...
Ditto.

Bluesound Node digital into MiniDsp Flex XLR into NAD C298.

Node and Flex replaced a NAD C658 and while Dirac was user friendly, tinkering with REW is just fine.

I'll ensure fixed gain as per Amir's review.
 
For EU fellows...
 
These rotten terminal blocks are not worthy of a device of this price. nad doesn't care about the world.

last experience with this manufacturer for my part
 

Attachments

  • 20231004_225751.jpg
    20231004_225751.jpg
    189 KB · Views: 367
I run both NAD C298 and Buckeye power amps in my system (and also Audiophonics gear on Purifi and Hypex). If I were buying power amps again I'd just go all-Buckeye Amps and save some cash.
 
Buckeye Purifi Amp:
450w @ 2ohm (peak)
425w @ 4ohm (peak)
225w @ 8ohm (peak)

I prefer the NAD especially because of its power @2 ohms and the possibility of bridging: Link
 
Last edited:
I run both NAD C298 and Buckeye power amps in my system (and also Audiophonics gear on Purifi and Hypex). If I were buying power amps again I'd just go all-Buckeye Amps and save some cash.
Having an Audiophonics HPA-S-400 recently purchased (200W at 8Ω, 2x400W at 4Ω), there is the most powerful 500 :
2x500W at 4Ω or 2x250W at 8Ω, I find it good for the price, otherwise at Nad, if we don't look at the money, NAD M23 possibility of bridging:
2*380W at 4Ω
2*200W at 8Ω
 
These are the correct measurements for the M23: Link
Thank you, it's more precise, I know this site well, Audiophonics sells the M23 as a reference power amp in Hi Fi and its own as a tighter budget alternative. I took one of theirs because it was mounted on an HC installation with a Denon 8500 having an integrated one on my Hi-Fi installation, I hesitated with the C298, but the price/performance/sound quality ratio was in favor of the HPA- S-400.
 
There's an interesting review of the old "power envelope" amp they used to have.
This NAD 2200 is still going very well as are 5 of my 6.
I have my main system tri-amped with 3 NAD 2200's (one running bridged mono @8 ohm's for each of 2 Dahlquist M-905's [a 6 ohm load] and 1 running stereo @ 4 ohm's to each of my 2 custom {by me} 4 ohm subs).
The 1 that is not going at this time suffered a giant power surge (from an exploding transformer on the telephone pole outside, the flash INSIDE my house house made momentary shadows on the walls INSIDE my home that also killed the 1350 watt UPS that it's power cord was plugged up to).
I have the amps on their own circuits in the home (there was a small black mark at the power outlet that the UPS plugged into but the 20 amp breaker was not tripped & the circuit tested fine. But I replaced the outlet anyway).
This 1 UPS & the 1 NAD were the only thing damaged in the 3 NAD 2200 system (reminder: each is on it's own 20 amp circuit).

Fortunately Peter (of Quirk Audio [which refurbishes a range of products from companies such as APT Holman, Harmon Kardon, Grommes, Fisher, Kenwood, Marantz, McIntosh, Mitsubishi, NAD, Nakamichi, Onkyo, Pioneer, Revox, Sansui and many others, including both tube and solid state units]. By selecting those products and designs that will reward upgrading and refurbishing, where new components, which as technology has evolved, are often greatly superior to the originals, can be installed, resulting in quite outstanding performance, which otherwise today is only available at the highest echelons, and cost, of specialist audio equipment, allowing one to have a GREAT vintage/classic product in your system),
had one of my other NAD 2200's in for servicing (I send them for general servicing & inspection about every 5 years or so), prioritized getting it finished for me & sent it back to me poste haste so that I could just pull the messed up one out of that system & put the newly serviced one into it's place.
Thank you Peter!
 
Last edited:
This NAD 2200 is still going very well as are 5 of my 6.
I have my main system tri-amped with 3 NAD 2200's (one running bridged mono @8 ohm's for each of 2 Dahlquist M-905's [a 6 ohm load] and 1 running stereo @ 4 ohm's to each of my 2 custom {by me} 4 ohm subs).
The 1 that is not going at this time suffered a giant power surge (from an exploding transformer on the telephone pole outside, the flash INSIDE my house house made momentary shadows on the walls INSIDE my home that also killed the 1350 watt UPS that it's power cord was plugged up to).
I have the amps on their own circuits in the home (there was a small black mark at the power outlet that the UPS plugged into but the 20 amp breaker was not tripped & the circuit tested fine. But I replaced the outlet anyway).
This 1 UPS & the 1 NAD were the only thing damaged in the 3 NAD 2200 system (reminder: each is on it's own 20 amp circuit).

Fortunately Peter (of Quirk Audio [which refurbishes a range of products from companies such as APT Holman, Harmon Kardon, Grommes, Fisher, Kenwood, Marantz, McIntosh, Mitsubishi, NAD, Nakamichi, Onkyo, Pioneer, Revox, Sansui and many others, including both tube and solid state units]. By selecting those products and designs that will reward upgrading and refurbishing, where new components, which as technology has evolved, are often greatly superior to the originals, can be installed, resulting in quite outstanding performance, which otherwise today is only available at the highest echelons, and cost, of specialist audio equipment, allowing one to have a GREAT vintage/classic product in your system),
had one of my other NAD 2200's in for servicing (I send them for general servicing & inspection about every 5 years or so), prioritized getting it finished for me & sent it back to me poste haste so that I could just pull the messed up one out of that system & put the newly serviced one into it's place.
Thank you Peter!
I still have my NAD Power Envelope 3130. It's a very nice sounding work horse of an integrated amplifier.
 
This is partly true, of course.

But even small manufacturers can replace boards, components, modules, etc.
Here is an example regarding my amplifier VR-03B (with Purifi 1ET400A).
New Power Supply Ectifier Board PW-2-PRE for Purifi buffer input stage (2 X OPA1612).
In general, there are no problems replacing components.
By the way, instead of a good encapsulated BV EI transformer, I now install a 2x18V toroidal
transformer specially created for this power line. Toroidal - quieter.
I remain a supporter of classic transformer power supply. I also appreciate the timbre sound of musical instruments (tones).
I continue to improve and optimize the amplifier design...
In general, this is not some kind of special business project.

Great project ) Reminds me of the Maroon Audio amplifier

S4e3bbecdbe4846dda584ded7f28a2d79v.jpg

S841879449c21413c91a53845d016f2d56.jpg
 
I purchased the C298 building a new system for my dedicated audio room. It's driving a pair of JBL L100 Classic 75th Anniversary speakers and I'm extremely happy with it and the way it pairs with the JBL's. It seems to have excellent control over the big 12" woofers, and offers tight low end extension. It is also very pleaing the the highs to my ears. On power it is far more than I will ever need in this room with the JBL's, dynamics are a cakwalk with the C298.

On the review . . . to me the price is quite fair considering the cost of high end amps these days. On aesthetics, I always like the utilitarian Grey that NAD uses. The Master series has much fancier casework, but it apears that internally the purifi amps in the master series are very very similar, so I opted for the "run of the mill" C298 :) As far as the holes on the top of the case being only over one of the internal heatsinks, I don't think it has much of an affect as the amp creates almost no heat at all at any ambient temp or usage.

Great to read your review, the specs seem to mirror my personal results with the amplifier.

Cheers!
 
IMG_0686.jpg


I just bought the C298 to replace my two Onkyos which were bridged.
power level is the same, but I find a higher level on the high frequencies.
on the other hand I lack bass I find (which I also felt with the B&W).. I know that the B&W 702 are difficult to drive.
I have two SB3000s in my cinema room, I will have to test with my two towers to see if I have a more!
 
Back
Top Bottom