I am not worried about sending him traffic. If traffic helps advance the topic, so be it. People look to me for consistency, constantly asking why I am not at war with MQA. I want them to know that they themselves are championing a pure subjectivist that puts little to no value to objective audio testing and research.
I don't think anybody's wondering why you aren't "at war with MQA."
At this point, I imagine people are wondering why you appointed yourself MQA's proxy?
This has gone beyond just a technical critique of what Golden One has said about MQA. Now you're doing a hit job on him.
Meanwhile, you've repeatedly stated how MQA works as if it is fact, even though many of their claims remain unverified by independent measurements. A lot of people consider ASR as the place where manufacturer claims are greeted with skepticism until they can be verified.
You've been dismissive of the notion that MQA's marketing is misleading. You've shown apathy for the closed format concerns. Oh, and then there's the untenable claim that MQA is free to users.
So no. I don't think people are wondering why you aren't fighting with MQA. You've been been busy taking on almost every critique of MQA.
On the other hand, I do think people are probably wondering why you didn't decide to stay more neutral? Showing skepticism of a manufacturer's claims until they are verified is not "going to war."