• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Minidsp Flex Review (Audio DSP)

Rate this product:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 4 0.7%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 16 2.8%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 117 20.5%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 435 76.0%

  • Total voters
    572

madrac

Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Messages
73
Likes
65
@ madrac - Can you clarify what you mean by " The better I/O selection is of some interest in case I move to a balanced preamp. "
Better probably not the best adjective- SHD has both XLR and RCA inputs, where Flex is either / or as far as I recall.
 

deercreekaudio

Member
Dealer
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
87
Likes
143
Location
Colorado
If having Dirac Live and balanced I/O are your primary objectives, then SHD is recommended. If not, the Flex will provide excellent results with it's 32 bit 48 kHz Dirac processing.
 

madrac

Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Messages
73
Likes
65
If having Dirac Live and balanced I/O are your primary objectives, then SHD is recommended. If not, the Flex will provide excellent results with it's 32 bit 48 kHz Dirac processing.
thanks. Primary objectives are cross-over mains/subs + bass (sub) EQ. Balanced I/O nice to have in case I do a future upgrade to my prepro. No real need for Dirac Live since I primarily EQ bass only.
 

enricoclaudio

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
1,109
Likes
2,195
Location
Houston, TX - USA
thanks. Primary objectives are cross-over mains/subs + bass (sub) EQ. Balanced I/O nice to have in case I do a future upgrade to my prepro. No real need for Dirac Live since I primarily EQ bass only.
If you don’t care about Dirac Live (now) and no need the streaming capabilities of the SHD, then the FLEX should be your choice. I have 2x4, FLEX TRS with Dirac Live and SHD. To me the FLEX TRS is the best bang for your buck out of all MiniDSPs.

IMG_9080.jpeg
 

mglobe

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 18, 2022
Messages
496
Likes
856
Location
Texas
Looking to add either a Flex or the SHD into my 2 channel set-up, primarily to integrate subs with mains & eq bass. System does include a turntable (primary source), Oppo 103D for CDs, and Cambridge Audio CXNv2 streamer.

Based on the review, the Flex looks like it should work fine. Any benefits of spending the additional for the SHD (according to miniDSP, better DACs and analog circuitry plus better I/O selection)? I don't need the streaming function on the SHD and am undecided about using DIRAC (vs. REW for sub EQ). DIRAC could always be added to the FLEX (although at a lower sample rate).

Leaning towards the Flex as I'm not sure how distinguishable the different DACs/circuitry is. The better I/O selection is of some interest in case I move to a balanced preamp.

Anyone try both? Thoughts?
If you’re a Roon user, the SHD is Roon Ready, which among other things allows you to control the SHD’s volume control via Roon.
 

madrac

Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Messages
73
Likes
65
Thanks for the responses.

@mglobe I'm not a Roon user (and hardly stream) - mostly vinyl.

@enricoclaudio I've had a 2x4HD and 10x10HD in my system at one point in time. Currently using an unbalanced Flex in my HT system - primarily to load ezBEQ filters and choose configuration with or without my Crowson transducers along with my 2 Rythmik E15HPs :). As my preamp (Rogue RP5) doesn't have balanced out, I'm leaning towards another unbalanced Flex. Figure if I do upgrade my preamp (considering RP7), I could then move to the Flex TRS at some point, although one of my Rythmiks has the PEQ3 amp (no XLR ins) whereas the other has the XLR3.
 

kurosawa

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
17
Likes
2
Please ignore . I found the sollution


I have received the Minidsp Flex digital yesterday. It works out of the box as a AD converter for my turntable.

Unfortunately, I can't seem to find the software to configure the preset(s). Under "user downloads" "Flex Series", I only see

...


SOLVED
 

Attachments

  • 1686899360721.png
    1686899360721.png
    71.9 KB · Views: 72
  • 1686899420515.png
    1686899420515.png
    83.5 KB · Views: 77
Last edited:

enricoclaudio

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
1,109
Likes
2,195
Location
Houston, TX - USA
The new software/plugin is Device Console. That’s the one you need to download.
 

Xenio

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2020
Messages
60
Likes
9
Hello,
I guess it has been asked many times but hey ...

Can we use the miniDSP flex height as an AVR substitution ? I think the only lacking features to really be a substitution is decoding of proprietary formats like dolby and such right ? But it can be done from a PC (and not from a blu-ray player or whatever else) ?

I'm looking at improving my x3700h/focal aria setup and this looked interesting
 

howard416

Active Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
255
Likes
144
Anyone know if the IMD issue has been solved in either the Flex or the new Flex Eight? I guess for the latter, we can only wait for Amir to do a review...
 

onlyoneme

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
1,117
Likes
624
Location
Poland
Is there any way of reducing the risk of intersample clipping on the Flex except limiting the signal on the source transport? Flex seems to have no headroom here and any gain / master volume manipulation is applied after the ASRC when clipping distortions are in the signal already.
 

mdsimon2

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 20, 2020
Messages
2,515
Likes
3,371
Location
Detroit, MI
Is there any way of reducing the risk of intersample clipping on the Flex except limiting the signal on the source transport? Flex seems to have no headroom here and any gain / master volume manipulation is applied after the ASRC when clipping distortions are in the signal already.

There is a firmware update in the works for all devices using device console that will change the gain structure such that the master volume control acts before the ASRC. I tested this with a 2x4HD in March but unfortunately the updated firmware has not been released.

Michael
 

onlyoneme

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
1,117
Likes
624
Location
Poland
There is a firmware update in the works for all devices using device console that will change the gain structure such that the master volume control acts before the ASRC. I tested this with a 2x4HD in March but unfortunately the updated firmware has not been released.

Michael
Thx! Was it a kind of non-public beta release? Any chance for more details published somewhere?
 

bkkchris

Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Messages
13
Likes
5
Help me confirm something. The Flex "Digital" version has no DAC included correct? I don't see why it would, but can't find any specifics that mention the specific exclusion of a DAC.
 

antcollinet

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
7,747
Likes
13,077
Location
UK/Cheshire
Help me confirm something. The Flex "Digital" version has no DAC included correct? I don't see why it would, but can't find any specifics that mention the specific exclusion of a DAC.
No analogue outputs, therefore no DAC by definition.
 

Abtr

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2021
Messages
10
Likes
8
I use the MiniDSP Flex/digital as volume control and parametric equalizer in my 2.2 audio system, feeding 2 channel Toslink into the DAC. Now my DAC is an RME ADI-2 DAC, which has digital volume control and PEQ of its own. Yet, the MiniDsp setup with the exact same filter (a simple low shelf-filter) sounds significantly cleaner and overall more integrated and natural. The difference is clearly audible. I identified the correct setup 7 out of 7 times in a blind listening test. Note that since all takes place in the digital realm the output volume of both setups is exactly equal so that can’t explain this result.

Possibly the PEQ output of the MiniDSP and RME differ very slightly, but I doubt that could explain what I hear. I personally think PEQ processing inside the RME produces electrical noise which somehow distorts the analog output. The MiniDSP’s optical output galvanically isolates it from the DAC so electrical noise can’t get into the DAC. Hence the better sound quality.

Anyway, though I'm generally very pleased with my MiniDSP unit, I also have a few issues. Firstly, the USB input is very finicky regarding the used USB cable. When I use the cable that is provided with it, streaming audio from a MacMini works fine, but if I use a cable that is 10 cm (or more) longer (which I used with various other USB interfaces without problems) it loses connection after a few seconds. A shorter cable again works fine. Does anyone recognize this? It makes me wonder about the long term reliability of the unit’s USB interface..

Secondly, the input selection (USB, Toslink, SPDIF, Analog, Bluetooth) requires 2 presses of the control knob and resets after just 1 second which is very annoying if you didn’t make your selection yet (you must then again press the control 2 times and make a selection within a second). I would prefer input selection after one press of the control, staying active for at least 5 seconds.

Third, it would be nice if there was a setting to disable the automatic dimming of the unit’s display, so the display would stay on.

Maybe some of these points can be addressed in the next software update :cool:
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom