March Audio Hypex Ncore Power Amplifiers

[March Audio]

Okay so you're admitting that the information you published is complete BS. Because you have no idea how it measures.

No, i know from the testing already performed the figures are very close to accurate.

So if I take a cue from the DAC1 thread, because you are refusing to disclose if you are a competitor or otherwise associated with the audio industry, that there is something to hide here?

 

[March Audio]

I think one of the advantages of having manufacturers in forums is that they can share more in depth info about their products. But for some reason @March Audio is being secretive about basic stuff. More openness will be appreciated, and may help to sell more.

There are no secrets.

 

[Krunok]

I think one of the advantages of having manufacturers in forums is that they can share more in depth info about their products. But for some reason @March Audio is being secretive about basic stuff. More openness will be appreciated, and may help to sell more.

From what I can see @Audionut is being secretive about ALL of the stuff - he hasn't even introduced himself as a manufacturer.

 

[March Audio]

I would focus more on providing accurate information to your potential clients rather than who I am.

So you are a competitor or otherwise associated with the audio industry and your aim is to discredit.

 

[Wombat]

From what I can see @Audionut is being secretive about ALL of the stuff - he hasn't even introduced himself as a manufacturer.

Did he introduce himself at all?

 

[March Audio]

The only way you're discrediting yourself is with your own mouth.

We are just asking if you are a competitor or if you are otherwise associated with the audio industry.

It is a very relevant and important question.

I think admin can check your IP address/geolocation against another user, as I have a suspicion as to who you might be. I could be wrong so I obviously wont say openly.

 

[Krunok]

Did he introduce himself at all?

Not that I have seen.

I'm trying hard to understand what he hopes to accomplish with attitude like this, but no results so far.

 

[March Audio]

Not that I have seen.

I'm trying hard to understand what he hopes to accomplish with attitude like this, but no results so far.

To discredit.

 

[Wombat]

Not that I have seen.

I'm trying hard to understand what he hopes to accomplish with attitude like this, but no results so far.

Maybe to see how far the moderators can be pushed. The more thinking members have handled it well.

 

[Krunok]

To discredit.

Not a very wise move - that only tells me he's fearing your products may hurt his sales because they are good and well priced, thus he's only giving you some free marketing.

 

[Purité Audio]

I really can’t see why people post under a pseudonym.
Keith

 

[Thomas savage]

I am asking legit questions that your potential customers should know. If you have nothing to hide, you should welcome these posts as it's bringing many views to your thread.

The raw data from Hypex is from a standalone module that requires other bits to function as a complete amplifier. This is no different than claiming your DAC has the exact same specs as the chip it uses. Misleading at best.

No your not just trolling , nothings hidden here . These amps are yet to be accurately tested as has been stated.

You clearly have some kind of agenda , I can tell you it dose not read well.

 

[March Audio]

Maybe to see how far the moderators can be pushed. The more thinking members have handled it well.

I have contacted Thomas. I am sure he will make whatever appropriate judgements.

 

[March Audio]

My agenda here is to see if you guys demand the same level of transparency from your buddies, as you do from the rest of the industry.

So your aim is to discredit Audio Science Review and myself. That points suspicion in clear directions.

 

[Wombat]

My agenda here is to see if you guys demand the same level of transparency from your buddies, as you do from the rest of the industry.

In bullshit, certainly. Can you identify where ASR tests methods and results are flawed compared to claims by manufacturers?

ASR is open to valid correction. Here is your opportunity.

 

[March Audio]

The only way you guys can discredit yourselves from my questions is with your own mouths.

So say who you are and what associations you have in the audio industry and we will consider if it is appropriate to take you seriously or if you have an ulterior motive.

I am extremely keen to have my products independently tested, obviously that could be by Amir or if there is another organisation or publication you think I should approach to perform a review, please say so.

 

[Wombat]

I think ASR is too tolerant at times yet constrains knowledgeable members from showing-up the wilfully ignorant.

 

[Thomas savage]

My agenda here is to see if you guys demand the same level of transparency from your buddies, as you do from the rest of the industry.

So as I understand it these amps are going to be reviewed , would you like to send amir a nord amp to test? Or one of yours?

We have not tested many amps mind you, I think they are a bit of a pita especially the class D variety but there’s certanly no conspiracy as you seem to be insinuating.

Things get tested, the data is objective I guess amirs take on products in his reviews has a subjective element to it based on his own value judgments. He’s fairly consistent across the board with those though.

 

[Wombat]

The only way you guys can discredit yourselves from my questions is with your own mouths.

You have too many questions and very few decent answers. Your game is old but doesn't hold sway here.

Let us turn this around. Are you a manufacturer of audio products or have a personal or vested interest with one?

 

[Wombat]

Well you have 3 clients lined amp so far anyways. Glad to be of assistance.

Cryptic crap.