They use Pascal, I don’t know which modules, I can ask if you like?
I understand AMIR is now worth 3000 pesetas dead or alive.
Keith
I understand AMIR is now worth 3000 pesetas dead or alive.
Keith
The 'legal' situation begins with whatever the manufacturer asserts. If they claim the end user operated the device in a 'manner not consistent' with its intended application then what can the owner do? Take them to some kind of arbitration or small claims court? Judge Judy? How much is that going to cost? In time and fees? I guess if the owner could prove that the unit doesn't meet specs they would have a case to pursue either a replacement or refund.What is the long term implication of this understandable position? Are you going to stop testing them as you cannot test them completely, or move to only testing new models that are under warranty? What is the legal situation on warranty repairs from mild stress testing?
Found it in the 6moons review. Dutch & Dutch 8c uses the same Pascal S-PRO2 modules. And DAC is a TI PCM4104 running 48kHz.They use Pascal, I don’t know which modules, I can ask if you like?
I understand AMIR is now worth 3000 pesetas dead or alive.
Keith
They use Pascal, I don’t know which modules, I can ask if you like?
I understand AMIR is now worth 3000 pesetas dead or alive.
Keith
These modules obviously are not SOTA, but I can't imagine that the 8Cs' implementation includes audiophile transformers that are likely to worsen the modules' performance.
I can't help wondering how many more "high end"integrated or separate preamp/power amp Amir has to measure in order to find a few more that can do better than the likes of the AVR-X3500H (the cheapest Denon that can be used as preamp), RX-A1080, MRX-520 (well, preamp only in this case) in SINAD (especially in the 5 W test), IMD, and linearity, or even SNR (think about all those extra copper/shielding) that should be important enough to audible sound quality. So often bashing of the SQ of AVRs despite their affordable price related to integrated amps seem almost unfair and unfounded. Obviously in terms of build quality and reliable, AVRs can't compare, that is for sure.
Next time I see another subjective reviews that says, "wow,the difference is night and day.. as soon I have the xyz amp added to my avr, I immediately hear more details that I never know existed, much wider soundstage, and dynamic impacts, all the harshness in the highs were gone blablabla....., I would be thinking about the measurements of the Audio research, Jeff Rowland and others measured here. I am glad the most expensive separates that I have ever bought was just a Bryston 4B SST. My next "separate", if ever get approval to go ahead, would be one or two Benchmark amp, at least that one not only measured great, also looks okay.
These modules obviously are not SOTA, but I can't imagine that the 8Cs' implementation includes audiophile transformers that are likely to worsen the modules' performance.
The factory measurements of these modules (if indeed they are the S-Pro 2) show somewhat (although not vastly) better performance than measured by Amir, FWIW:
View attachment 58446
EDIT: I would also say that these measurements show why it may be useful/important to measure nonlinear distortion as a function of frequency, especially with class D amps.
Clip leads and small nails (to stick in the holes).
Pro tip.
My solution to nonstandard 'binding posts'.
Clip leads and small nails (to stick in the holes).
100% compatibility.
You're welcome.