I never even heard of GR Research until about a month ago, so I don't know about any of their previous products. I don't know anyone here who has been defending the LGK 2.0, although I speculated that it might perform better if 2 or 3 of them were run in parallel on each side (left/right), but still without a crossover. The idea of running a single 3" full range driver in a loudspeaker seems unlikely to work in a regular listening room. A single 3" driver is more suitable for a headphone.well, if there isn't the endless defending of the speaker it won't stay on the front page for so long, it is NOT the only speaker gets bashed here for poor measurement, but most just don't have a fan base to keep arguing it's actually a great speaker.
Remember the GR research XLS Encore? and the Klipsch RP600 mod from GR research? they actually gets positive review here in ASR, by Amirm himself, it's not a crusade against Danny, it's an opposition to the claim that this particular product is great, fantastic or ok etc.
IMO it is the scientific way, providing evidence and debate on the fact of the specific thing, not brand image defending.
I personally think Amir made an important observation about playing a track with both deep bass and female vocal at the same time, and the distortion that resulted from the LGK 2.0 when a single driver is expected to reproduce those tones simultaneously at realistic listening levels. I encouraged Amir to come up with some standard instrument test to measure that (instead of playing a music track), but he has repeatedly given reasons why he thinks that is not practical to do.