Thank you!
WT*... This makes the inexpensive Elac DBR-62 suddenly worth £18.600!
[Scientific calculation: £20.000 - £1.400 for more refined Paradigm finish = £8.600 + £10.000 for proper engineering.]
Thank you!
Could you elaborate on that?I certainly felt a vague sense of unease when we had the small pair here.
Keith
This is getting silly. It's like saying a BMW M2 series isn't that good which must mean the BMW M5 is the same. No the 9h's are exceptional. The smallest of the persona's are very different from the 9h's.
I'd hope so but I'm not sure. Clearly with their new voicing they intend for people to hear that sound, which means no equalization. We shouldn't have to "fix" their product for them.I’m with you, and the beautiful thing is that the market these speakers are intended for also understands.
That's the marketing. But when you run "room EQ" the removal of room effects is only true for the region below the transition from modal to stochastic. Above that, speakers will be bent to the will of the target curve. So a bright speaker will be brought under control. The only way around that is to limit the correction. Some will do that but many won't.You have completely misunderstood. Your not fixing the speakers your fixing your room.
This site is about raw, anechoic measurements where all speakers are put on the same playing field. Bringing in other variables just unnecessarily confuses things.what room where the measurements taken, what amp, what receiver? What equipment was used to take the measurements, what were the settings?...... See my point.
Again someone give me a symantic definition for natural sounding. Else this stuff you tell yourself is to fill gaps and holes in your argument.
In the lower frequencies we are listening more the room response (plus loudspeakers of course) while in the upper frequencies we mainly interpret tonality from the direct sounds, thus the loudspeakers, so there doing EQ is mainly a loudspeaker correction.Your not fixing the speakers your fixing your room.